le pauvre !

This posting has been cancelled by the author of the medium.

OJ,

Vous avez le cervau d'un sandwich au fromage.

that which is
complain is you holy cannoli

Satan work.
El trabajo de Satanas destruir la iglesia.
Oren para no caer en tentasion.

Dove sono gli uomini italiani?



Avrebbero apprezzare una bella donna senza sentirsi in colpa.

Envoyer vos plaintes ici.
Send your complaints here:

Thoseoffendedbyattractivewomen'slegs@VaticanCity.com

Bon,nous sommes dans l'obligation de realiser qu'il y a des gens,mais completement single sur ce site!!! honte !

By now, you probably realize that I don't care what pompous, puritanical, self-rightous, super-Catholic whiners think about this video or anything else for that matter. However, I have several recommendations for you.

Recommendations:

1) If you don't like it don't watch it. There is absolutly nothing in this video that is any more scandalous that what we have witnessed occur in our own Church during the last decade. If you must be outraged about something (some bitter individutals feel the … [More]

Cela n'a pas a etre ici!

My Dear Grand Inquisitors,

The point being is that the bishops of Italy including HH evidently see no problem with bare chested males. I, and most heterosexuals, see no problem with leggy females.

Vive la différence.
Capice?

Naughty, naughty.....

Re: The Acrobats -
1. No bad taste here - the art of the acrobats is just that. It was not at Mass, nor in a Church and did not involve a priest or cleric of Holy Mother Church (not one of the acrobats is a priest). Shirts off.... men do not have mamary glands!
2. I see no sexual overtones. They came, did their acrobatics and left. That's all. No gyrating or the like.

Is the following spectacle appropriate for a Catholic? Is it in "bad taste"?
Are there "sexual overtones"?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rbxov7CVi8

Yoo-hoo!

Ba-Ba-Ba-Ba-Benny!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKC-A2fSQ3Y

Ttfn...

It's factual. If you don't like it, too bad. Deal with it.
Direct your outrage in the proper direction and toward those who were directly and indirectly responsible.

This harmelss video means nothing. The homosexuals in the clergy are what's eating away at the Chruch's credibility and moral authority.

Cannoli, Why would one sink to such depths? No one is talking about clerical homosexuality or paedophilia here.... even in jest. But then again, you do thrive on the "enfant-terrible" modus operandi of the 'shock factor' in what you say and post.

Anyway, go to dash! Do take care and have a good day.

This could happen is real life???? Gosh..... the clergy must be rather corrupt out there in the USA. However, I have a sneaky suspicion that they aren't.....

I understand your point. But the main thing is that of the content, not that of the genre.

Compare that video with yours.

They are 2 totally different videos. My point is that although this is a Catholic site, many non-Catholic videos are featured. Evidently, as long as the video features a hound and not a beautiful young women, nobody complains.

the inappropriately attired lass,

I don't want to get too personal, but tell us, are you fully clothed when going to sleep?

The “sexual overtones” you speak of are simply a young, attractive female whose legs are fully exposed. I … [More]

Compare that video with yours. In yours we have the sexual overtones, the making fun of the priest, the inappropriately attired lass, etc. Looking at the 'Ginger' video, do we see any of this? Nope....all we see is a sketch based on a dog owner's breakfast with the help of her pet; completely innocent and void of all sexual overtones, indecency, etc.....

Remember, Cannoli, I said there is nothing wrong in humour, rather, the type of humour posted on Gloria.tv.

Pax in Domino,

This is because Gloria.tv is not a secular site and therefore, not a secular audience.

The more Catholic the better, right?

http://en.gloria.tv/?media=110298

"Doina's videos, by contrast, were meant for the family including her extended family at Gloria.Tv. "

This is my point Cannoli. If the advert here in this video was mean for a secular audience, and Doina's were meant for "her extended family at Gloria.tv", then the two are 'chalk-and-cheese'. This is because Gloria.tv is not a secular site and therefore, not a secular audience. Gloria.tv is rather a Roman Catholic site. Herein is located the inappropriate nature of, not this advert, but rather … [More]

Humour is a function of the intellectual and psychological maturation of an individual.

Not necessarily. There are intelligent men who find the "3 Stooges" to be funny but most women (from my limited experience) despise their comedy. Ditto for Benny Hill.

Take for instance the humour of Doina; ...

Doina's home videos were cute, entertaining, interesting and I enjoyed them but I wouldn't call them humorous. I don't beleive they were filmed in order to evoke laughter in the viewer.

Think … [More]

Humour is a function of the intellectual and psychological maturation of an individual. Take for instance the humour of Doina; recall the posts she made when her family visited, with Don Reto (e.g. shaking the snow from the flowers; the horse-and-trap trip around the countryside, etc.). Now that is harmless, beautiful and funny humour. This speaks of a mind and person who is well formed, balanced.

You, Canolli, on the other hand, by posting this video and calling it 'humour' has shown that … [More]

Thanks, Jana.
---------------------------------------

Benny,
Evidently you're a slow learner and you felt compelled to get in one more dig.

To insure domestic tranquility, avoid me and I will do likewise with you. I have found this to be a most effective way of dealing with obsessive,
argumentative, and hostile individuals (some of whom posted on this thread) especially those who are devoid of a sense of humor.

In my final words to you, you may want to consider that not everything in life is … [More]

Holy C.

I didn't study sexual behaviours of Europe in contrast to the states. I think there can only be very small differences.