03:25
Gloria TV News. A Journalist Harasses Bishop Williamson Argentina. Yesterday, bishop Richard Williamson has boarded an international flight at Buenos Aires airport directed to London. Williamson was …More
Gloria TV News.
A Journalist Harasses Bishop Williamson
Argentina. Yesterday, bishop Richard Williamson has boarded an international flight at Buenos Aires airport directed to London. Williamson was wearing sun-glasses, a baseball-cap and a coat. A journalist tried to harass him and kept provoking the cleric although the bishop refused to talk to him. At this point Williamson showed him his fist. At the end, the journalist had to be stopped by two bystanders. There is only one direct flight from Buenos Aires airport to London each day, a British Airways service that leaves at 14.15 local time and takes 15 hours to reach Heathrow airport.
Vatican
Misinterpretation of "active participation."
Archbishop Ranjith, who was called to the Vatican personally by Pope Benedict to serve as a papal ally in the quest to restore a sense of reverence in the liturgy, makes his comments in the Foreword to a new book based on the diaries and notes of Cardinal Fernando Antonelli, who was a key figure in …More
willyfr
Bishop Williamson is now in England and was well escorted by the Police on his arrival. According to this blog : timescolumns.typepad.com/…/bishop-williams…
He was due to be welcomed by well known revisionists. The error of Williamson is to focus too much on History and too little on religion. 🤨More
Bishop Williamson is now in England and was well escorted by the Police on his arrival. According to this blog : timescolumns.typepad.com/…/bishop-williams…

He was due to be welcomed by well known revisionists. The error of Williamson is to focus too much on History and too little on religion. 🤨
RevSpitz
You said it clearly, Christ, the
only real Redeemer of mankind, this applies to Jew or non-Jew. The dividing line is if one accepts Jesus Christ or rejects Him.
Christ was clear about that, You are with me or against me. You are gathering or you are scattering. Without me no one will see the Kingdom of God.
Without Christ we are still in our sin and separated from God. When we come to Jesus Christ …More
You said it clearly, Christ, the
only real Redeemer of mankind, this applies to Jew or non-Jew. The dividing line is if one accepts Jesus Christ or rejects Him.

Christ was clear about that, You are with me or against me. You are gathering or you are scattering. Without me no one will see the Kingdom of God.

Without Christ we are still in our sin and separated from God. When we come to Jesus Christ and submit to Him, he takes away our sins, by His death on the cross.

There is no other way, all paths may lead to Rome, but only one path leads to our Father and that path is His Son our Lord Jesus Christ.
Bennor
Pour la traduction française du texte voir gloria.tv
tabsimaus732
Pétition signée !
Soutenons-le et prions pour lui. Il traverse une rude épreuve en ce moment. Que Dieu lui envoie ses grâcesMore
Pétition signée !

Soutenons-le et prions pour lui. Il traverse une rude épreuve en ce moment. Que Dieu lui envoie ses grâces
Freiheit
www.soutenir-mgr-williamson.co.cc
THE WILLIAMSON CASE
1) Faith and Morality suppose History and politics (which is "social
morality" and has nothing to do with political parties). Separating
Faith from politics is the essence of liberal Catholicism. Moreover,
historical facts are the basis of Catholic Faith: for instance, if
Jesus' birth, death and Resurrection were not historical facts, our
Faith …More
www.soutenir-mgr-williamson.co.cc

THE WILLIAMSON CASE

1) Faith and Morality suppose History and politics (which is "social
morality" and has nothing to do with political parties). Separating
Faith from politics is the essence of liberal Catholicism. Moreover,
historical facts are the basis of Catholic Faith: for instance, if
Jesus' birth, death and Resurrection were not historical facts, our
Faith would collapse. Jesus was born under Augustus' reign and died
under Pontius Pilate’s authority. Similarly, exterminationism is the
basis of the holocaustical religion, which intends to replace the
Holocaust of Jesus, Redeemer of mankind, by the Holocaust of the
Jewish people.

2) It is impossible to restore Faith in its integrity without
restoring social or political life ("Restaurare omnia in Christo",
was Saint Pius X's motto) and without having an historical knowledge
based on facts and not myths, especially if those are instruments to
propose a new theological concept (Holocaust of the Jews) and to
unhinge the traditional Catholic concept (Holocaust of the Christ).

3) Holocaust was the basis of Vatican II's new doctrine about deicide
("Nostra Aetate"), of Paul VI's reform of Good Friday's prayer (NOM,
1970), of John Paul II's theory about "the Old Covenant which was
never cancelled" (in Magonza, 1981). Moreover, the "theology of God's
silence" was born following reflections on Holocaust, as it is
presented by the "exterminationists." Some theologians (following
Hans Jonas' and Giovanni Battista Metz's steps) deny Providence and
God's goodness and call into question His existence because God
allowed Holocaust. Holocaust is for Talmudic Judaism
a "meta-historical absolute", a sacrificial act which has a saving
value. After the destruction of the Temple (70 AD), rabbinical
exegesis replaced Mosaic Faith in a personal Messiah by Faith in
a "collective Messiah", who is the Jewish people. Christianity cannot
accept this sacralization of the Jewish Holocaust, which would be the
denying of its own identity and Faith: the only Holocaust is the
Sacrifice of Christ. Admitting another saving and "meta-historical"
Holocaust besides Jesus' would be an act of apostasy. Unfortunately,
the new Judaic conciliar and postconciliar theology of the council
grew in a progressist Catholic environment, we hope it did not
pollute the environment bound to Tradition. Therefore, the Priest's
duty is to warn the faithful.

4) It does not seem me a sin or a breaking to express one's own
opinion about historical validity of a vast literature concerning
the "re-examination" (and not "negation") of Holocaust's thesis,
introduced by the pro-Soviet Gromiko in 1948. Many historians, in
Israel as well, assert there is no historical certainty about a IIIrd
Reich's plan to destroy the Jewish people with gas chambers. Of
course, there were deportations to concentration camps, where many
Jews were killed. Killing an innocent is a crime and a serious sin
against the fifth commandment. Bishop Richard Williamson expressed it
clearly during the interview, he said nothing contrary to Faith and
Morality, outlined only his opinion, which does not discredit the
integral Catholic doctrine. If the bishop as a bishop talks about
Faith and Morality, with an ecclesiastic authority, it does not mean
he could not talk, without an ecclesiastic authority, about History
or social morality. Moreover, if Bishop Williamson's positions or,
better said, opinions about the Holocaust do not reflect FSSPX's
opinions, so I wonder: in such a case, if it is lawful for the
Fraternity to talk about History or politics, why is it not the same
for Bishop Williamson?

5) It is at least naive to deceive oneself into believing a
small "mea culpa" (one hoped they came to an end with John Paul's
death) could appease the anger and the hatred of Judaism against
Christ and His Church. In fact, the chief rabbi of Rome (Riccardo Di
Signi) said at once that Bishop Fellay's apologies (who only talked
about "inappropriateness") were completely insufficient and
irrelevant. Thus it is necessary to re-examine the old theological
positions against Judaism which, as Jules Isaac said (belittling the
Holocaust), deny religious freedom (ecumenism, negation of the
deicide, appropriateness of the Saint Pius V Mass), as the Italian
rabbi reaffirmed in 2007. Then Di Segni asked the FSSPX not to limit
itself to silence the one "negationist" bishop (who in reality is not
negationist), but to make clear its very thought about Vatican II's
doctrine and about Judaism. The very problem, according to Di Segni,
is the theological position of the FSSPX about Judaism, and if it is
not made clear (that is, if a new position is accepted, as Bishop
Lefebvre's positions about ecumenism and deicide are clear), the
question remains open. We should not to imagine to calm down a lion
who wants to waste (his prey) just by giving him a little ball of
meat. Di Segni will accuse us of anti-Semitism, as he did with Bishop
Williamson.

6) If Jesus Christ had not made inappropriate sermons ("you whose
father is the devil", Jean, VIII, 48), he would have died in His bed
and would not have accomplished the Father's will. Saint Paul advises
to "preach appropriately and inappropriately". Saint Thomas, in the
theological Sum, writes "it is necessary to preach the truth to the
Jews, without being afraid of irritating them, as Jesus who taught
publicly the truth which they hated, and reproached them for their
vice, without being afraid of irritating them" (Saint Thomas, III,
42, 2). The Apostles were "happy to suffer persecutions" from the
Sanhedrin because they preached about Christ crucified by the High
Priests and they were not frightened of disrepute, on the contrary
they loved it.

7) Cardinal Bagnasco was more firm and fair, he talked about a
campaign orchestrated by the media. He did not re-excommunicate
anyone.

8) I hope these facts will not lead to new divides. Perhaps a greater
doctrinal firmness and a real brotherly charity would have saved what
a harshness of heart and a theological-historical-political weakness
seem to have engendered. The responsible one does not seem to me to be
Bishop Williamson: Father Reginaldo Garrigou-Lagrange wrote "liberals
are broad-minded in doctrine because they do not believe firmly, and
pitiless in practice, because they do not really love."

9) Lastly Benedict XVI intervened (this morning) in defence,
unfortunately, of the Holocaust, and he told that the normalisation
of the relations with the "traditionalists" depends on their whole
acceptance of Vatican II. Perhaps all these events have be useful in
taking away all ambiguity, the Catholics bound to Tradition know
that, if they do not accept "Nostra Aetate" and the
post-conciliar "Judaeo-Christianity", there will be no room for them.

10) Let God give us the courage – in this sad time of "universal
apostasy" – to maintain the Faith in the Holocaust of Christ, the
only real Redeemer of mankind.

Don Curzio Nitoglia

28th January 2009