German Spiegel.tv harasses International Gloria.tv. Hendrik Vöhringer from Spiegel.tv tried on Saturday evening, March 2nd, to enter illegitimately the Church in Rueras (Switzerland). Gloria.tv however …More
German Spiegel.tv harasses International Gloria.tv.
Hendrik Vöhringer from Spiegel.tv tried on Saturday evening, March 2nd, to enter illegitimately the Church in Rueras (Switzerland). Gloria.tv however filmed back.
Hendrik Vöhringer from Spiegel.tv tried on Saturday evening, March 2nd, to enter illegitimately the Church in Rueras (Switzerland). Gloria.tv however filmed back.
Pia Piissima
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
@Holy Cannoly,
Thank you for your explanation. Now I understand. You are right, that their report then could have been manipulated in a very nusty way.
Now I saw also the second video on the topic and this is really a scandal what these journalists did.
Dear Gloria.TV, you are doing a great job! God bless you More
@Holy Cannoly,
Thank you for your explanation. Now I understand. You are right, that their report then could have been manipulated in a very nusty way.
Now I saw also the second video on the topic and this is really a scandal what these journalists did.
Dear Gloria.TV, you are doing a great job! God bless you
Thank you for your explanation. Now I understand. You are right, that their report then could have been manipulated in a very nusty way.
Now I saw also the second video on the topic and this is really a scandal what these journalists did.
Dear Gloria.TV, you are doing a great job! God bless you
wirewrapper
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
If the Cardinal in Germany didn't feel a threat from Gloria.tv then he would not have done this. GOOD work Gloria.tv for standing up to the Traditional Values of the Church! I fear we may see more of this insanity even with a new Pope, because it really all depends on who it is...
Holy Cannoli
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
I don't want to defend this journalist but he seemed to be very friendly,
Evidently you did NOT listen to this video?
This very friendly journalist that you speak of:
along with his cameraman, illegitimately, unannounced, and disrespectfully entered into the Catholic Church or Rueras in the Romanish-speaking region of Switzerland. The shocking incident happened only a few minutes before Mass was …More
I don't want to defend this journalist but he seemed to be very friendly,
Evidently you did NOT listen to this video?
This very friendly journalist that you speak of:
along with his cameraman, illegitimately, unannounced, and disrespectfully entered into the Catholic Church or Rueras in the Romanish-speaking region of Switzerland. The shocking incident happened only a few minutes before Mass was scheduled to begin. When the uninvited intruders where asked to leave the Church, the cameraman of German Spiegel.tv resisted boorishly further disturbing the congregation of churchgoers.
There is your "very friendly journalist."
----------------------------------------------------------------
Furthermore, if you had taken the time to listen to this video you would have known that during his appearance, Vöhringer showed himself to be a staunch defender of Cardinal Meisner and his wicked decision regarding the abortive morning-after pill.
Spiegel.tv, who hired your "very friendly journalist" is a strong advocate of abortion rights so it is completely understandable that they would support Meisner in his advocacy for the use of the abortive morning-after pill in Catholic hospitals.
How do you think this abortion friendly Spiegel.tv, would edit the video that they took from a pro-life individual or group?
Do you think they would give a fair and balanced report showing both sides pro-life and pro-abortion equally or would they slant their story to suit their own pro-abortion worldview?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you note in the video that after mass the faithful parishioners were shocked by your "very friendly journalist's" conduct?
In all likelyhood the shocked Swiss faithful were commenting that Vöhringer was using a tactic reminiscent of the German Waffen-SS with the only difference being that your "very friendly journalist." and his thugs removed all Nazi symbols from their clothing before coming to Switzerland.
Evidently you did NOT listen to this video?
This very friendly journalist that you speak of:
along with his cameraman, illegitimately, unannounced, and disrespectfully entered into the Catholic Church or Rueras in the Romanish-speaking region of Switzerland. The shocking incident happened only a few minutes before Mass was scheduled to begin. When the uninvited intruders where asked to leave the Church, the cameraman of German Spiegel.tv resisted boorishly further disturbing the congregation of churchgoers.
There is your "very friendly journalist."
----------------------------------------------------------------
Furthermore, if you had taken the time to listen to this video you would have known that during his appearance, Vöhringer showed himself to be a staunch defender of Cardinal Meisner and his wicked decision regarding the abortive morning-after pill.
Spiegel.tv, who hired your "very friendly journalist" is a strong advocate of abortion rights so it is completely understandable that they would support Meisner in his advocacy for the use of the abortive morning-after pill in Catholic hospitals.
How do you think this abortion friendly Spiegel.tv, would edit the video that they took from a pro-life individual or group?
Do you think they would give a fair and balanced report showing both sides pro-life and pro-abortion equally or would they slant their story to suit their own pro-abortion worldview?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you note in the video that after mass the faithful parishioners were shocked by your "very friendly journalist's" conduct?
In all likelyhood the shocked Swiss faithful were commenting that Vöhringer was using a tactic reminiscent of the German Waffen-SS with the only difference being that your "very friendly journalist." and his thugs removed all Nazi symbols from their clothing before coming to Switzerland.
Pia Piissima
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
I don't want to defend this journalist but he seemed to be very friendly, so why do you think it would be a bad idea just to answer a couple of his questions?
I mean I never was in such a situation, so I really don't imagine, why is it so bad.
I mean I never was in such a situation, so I really don't imagine, why is it so bad.
Holy Cannoli
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
This video is an example of “ambush journalism” and it has been effective in the States and elsewhere more often than not. This tactic often accomplishes its goal and that's the reason it is used by unprincipled “journalists” such as Hendrik Vöhringer.
The target of this kind of attack will often answer the “journalists” questions without hesitation speaking directly into the video camera.
What …More
This video is an example of “ambush journalism” and it has been effective in the States and elsewhere more often than not. This tactic often accomplishes its goal and that's the reason it is used by unprincipled “journalists” such as Hendrik Vöhringer.
The target of this kind of attack will often answer the “journalists” questions without hesitation speaking directly into the video camera.
What the target does not realize is that he/she is being used by the unscrupulous “journalist” and that the interview is not meant to be a search for the truth.
The “ambush interview” is a search for sensationalism and the more sensationalism the better for the “journalist.” The video will be edited to emphasis insignificant points to create a sensational effect while the cutting deliberately removes the essence of the issue at hand.
The best defense for such an attack is the one we have witnessed in this film. Silence....complete silence no matter what taunts are used by the “journalist” to evoke a response from the target.
Good work by everyone at Gloria.
The target of this kind of attack will often answer the “journalists” questions without hesitation speaking directly into the video camera.
What the target does not realize is that he/she is being used by the unscrupulous “journalist” and that the interview is not meant to be a search for the truth.
The “ambush interview” is a search for sensationalism and the more sensationalism the better for the “journalist.” The video will be edited to emphasis insignificant points to create a sensational effect while the cutting deliberately removes the essence of the issue at hand.
The best defense for such an attack is the one we have witnessed in this film. Silence....complete silence no matter what taunts are used by the “journalist” to evoke a response from the target.
Good work by everyone at Gloria.
holyrope 3
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Amerikaner wissen, dass Spiegel.tv wertlos ist
Holy Cannoli
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment