Judgment against Austrian Pro-Lifers. On April 4, the single judge Erik Nauta, of the regional court of Graz, sentenced four pro-lifers to high penalties for stalking. They are charged with having …More
Judgment against Austrian Pro-Lifers.
On April 4, the single judge Erik Nauta, of the regional court of Graz, sentenced four pro-lifers to high penalties for stalking.
They are charged with having repeatedly stalked the Graz-based abortionist, Johannes Hanfstingl.
Judge Nauta also convicted the Austrian director of the pro-life organization Human Life International, Dietmar Fischer, for stalking in Graz – although the latter works in Vienna not Graz. His fine is 180 daily rates of 40 euros each totaling 7.200 euros. ($10,000.00 US Dollars)
Furthermore, the two activists who offered help on the sidewalks and one woman who worked as a consultant were sentenced to fines between 450 and 840 euros. ($600.00 - $1200.00 USD)
Gloria.tv is in possession of the contradictory reasons given for the judgment as well as the appeal made against the unjust verdict.
Nauta claims that the accused had deliberately planned to stalk the abortionist.
The pro-lifers responded by saying that in Graz – as in …More
On April 4, the single judge Erik Nauta, of the regional court of Graz, sentenced four pro-lifers to high penalties for stalking.
They are charged with having repeatedly stalked the Graz-based abortionist, Johannes Hanfstingl.
Judge Nauta also convicted the Austrian director of the pro-life organization Human Life International, Dietmar Fischer, for stalking in Graz – although the latter works in Vienna not Graz. His fine is 180 daily rates of 40 euros each totaling 7.200 euros. ($10,000.00 US Dollars)
Furthermore, the two activists who offered help on the sidewalks and one woman who worked as a consultant were sentenced to fines between 450 and 840 euros. ($600.00 - $1200.00 USD)
Gloria.tv is in possession of the contradictory reasons given for the judgment as well as the appeal made against the unjust verdict.
Nauta claims that the accused had deliberately planned to stalk the abortionist.
The pro-lifers responded by saying that in Graz – as in …More
Hi! 
I have listened to this broadcast, and yes, having considered the evidence, I think the judgement wrong. However, on the other hand, stalking anyone is quite irregular indeed; stalkers in any circumstance ought not to be treated well because I would say they are harassing their "prey".
Consider the situation from the other point of view, i.e. of pure law: regardless of reason, e.g. love, …More
Hi! I have listened to this broadcast, and yes, having considered the evidence, I think the judgement wrong. However, on the other hand, stalking anyone is quite irregular indeed; stalkers in any circumstance ought not to be treated well because I would say they are harassing their "prey".
Consider the situation from the other point of view, i.e. of pure law: regardless of reason, e.g. love, hate, mental illness, stalking of a citizen leads to all sorts of invasion of privacy, harassment, etc.
On the other hand, the abortionist doctors need to know that what they are doing is indeed wrong and is no less than murder. Therefore, what is one to do? The peaceful protesting within the confines of the law just might be the answer..... (?)
Consider the situation from the other point of view, i.e. of pure law: regardless of reason, e.g. love, hate, mental illness, stalking of a citizen leads to all sorts of invasion of privacy, harassment, etc.
On the other hand, the abortionist doctors need to know that what they are doing is indeed wrong and is no less than murder. Therefore, what is one to do? The peaceful protesting within the confines of the law just might be the answer..... (?)