
Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$14.49$14.49
FREE delivery: Wednesday, April 3 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $11.45

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The End of History and the Last Man Paperback – March 1, 2006
Purchase options and add-ons
Francis Fukuyama's prescient analysis of religious fundamentalism, politics, scientific progress, ethical codes, and war is as essential for a world fighting fundamentalist terrorists as it was for the end of the Cold War. Now updated with a new afterword, The End of History and the Last Man is a modern classic.
- Print length464 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateMarch 1, 2006
- Dimensions5.5 x 1.1 x 8.44 inches
- ISBN-100743284550
- ISBN-13978-0743284554
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Editorial Reviews
Review
-- George Gilder, The Washington Post Book World
"Bold, lucid, scandalously brilliant. Until now, the triumph of the West was merely a fact. Fukuyama has given it a deep and highly original meaning."
-- Charles Krauthammer
"Clearly written...Immensely ambitious...A tightly argued work of political philosophy...Fukuyama deserves to have his argument taken seriously."
-- William H. McNeill, The New York Times Book Review
"Provocative and elegant...Complex and interesting...Fukuyama is to be applauded for posing important questions in serious and stimulating ways."
-- Ronald Steel, USA Today
"Extraordinary...Controversial...A superb book. Whether or not one accepts his thesis, he has injected serious political philosophy into the discussion of political affairs and thereby significantly enriched it."
-- Mackubin Thomas Owens, The Washington Times
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Free Press; Reissue edition (March 1, 2006)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 464 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0743284550
- ISBN-13 : 978-0743284554
- Item Weight : 12.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 1.1 x 8.44 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #37,586 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #54 in Political Philosophy (Books)
- #84 in History & Theory of Politics
- #100 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Francis Fukuyama is Olivier Nomellini Senior Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies (FSI) at Stanford University, and Mosbacher DIrector of FSI's Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law.
Dr. Fukuyama has writtenon questions concerning governance, democratization, and international political economy. His book, The End of History and the Last Man, was published by Free Press in 1992 and has appeared in over twenty foreign editions. His most recent books are The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution, and Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. His book Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment will be published in Septmer 2018.
Francis Fukuyama received his B.A. from Cornell University in classics, and his Ph.D. from Harvard in Political Science. He was a member of the Political Science Department of the RAND Corporation from 1979-1980, then again from 1983-89, and from 1995-96. In 1981-82 and in 1989 he was a member of the Policy Planning Staff of the US Department of State, and was a member of the US delegation to the Egyptian-Israeli talks on Palestinian autonomy. From 1996-2000 he was Omer L. and Nancy Hirst Professor of Public Policy at the School of Public Policy at George Mason University, and from 2001-2010 he was Bernard L. Schwartz Professor of International Political Economy at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University. He served as a member of the President’s Council on Bioethics from 2001-2004.
Francis Fukuyama is married to Laura Holmgren and lives in Palo Alto, California.
March 2018
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Informed by more than 30 years of history since 1992, I begin this critique with what Prof Fukuyama unequivocally got right. In the concluding 5th part of his book, which is entitled “The Last Man,” he contemplates Friedrich Nietzsche’s deep contempt for both Christianity and democracy. To understand the origin of this contempt, one must recall that Nietzche was the sickly son of a Lutheran pastor who died of a brain ailment (stroke?) at the age of 36 in 1849, and that Friedrich spent the last ten years before his death by stroke in 1900 in a state of extreme mental distress and under the doting, manipulative, and intensely antisemitic care of his younger sister Elizabeth. Consequently, as Fukuyama explicates Nietzsche’s political philosophy,
“Nietzsche’s last man was, in essence, the victorious slave. He agreed fully with Hegel that Christianity was a slave ideology, and that democracy represented a secularized form of Christianity. The equality of all men before the law was a realization of the Christian ideal of the equality of all believers in the Kingdom of Heaven." [p.301]
Looking farther back in HTJH-JH, I trace the idea of the rule of law transcending the rule of the King from the story recorded in the Holy Bible’s 2 Kings 23. In it, Judah's pious King Josiah reads publicly from a new book of the law - that is, an update of the Torah. As the Hebrew Bible tells what scholars assure us very likely is a factual recounting, that book was handed to Josiah in 621 BCE under the false pretense that it had been authored by Moses and “discovered” in the First Temple during renovations by a leader of the Temple priesthood who had raised him from childhood. But as Prof Fukuyama goes on accurately to summarize regarding Nietzsche's adamantly anti-Christian ideas,
“The liberal democratic state did not constitute a synthesis of the morality of the master and the morality of the slave, as Hegel had said. For Nietzsche, it represented an unconditional victory of the slave. The master’s freedom and satisfaction were nowhere preserved, for no one really ruled in a democratic society.” [p.301]
A few pages later (on p. 328), the good professor backhandedly fingered Donald Trump as the obstreperously Megalomanic kind of character who might upend early 19th century German political philosopher Georg Hegel’s implicitly Left-leaning political ideals following the American and French revolutions. As Fukuyama explained, Hegel recognized the grounding of democratic ideals in the Judeo-Christian ethical concept of the universal equality of all men before the law based on our moral freedom (i.e., free will). Hegel further argued that the rise of democracies marked the demise of what he called earlier stages of history’s “master-slave relations” and thus, democracy was the natural end state of political evolution – and in that sense, the End of History.
Indeed, the great strength and lasting academic value of Fukuyama’s book is how clearly and concisely he introduces readers to aspects of political philosophy that continue to undergird political arguments of the present day – including ideas of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke which remain the backbone of conservative liberalism (and no, as Prof Fukuyama explains at length, that is not an oxymoronic self-contradiction). In addition, he goes on to highlight an assortment of subtleties that influence the relative strength and weaknesses of democracies and the ways in which they are organized and can decay.
By the time he wrote his "Afterword" to the 2006 edition, historical events had not yet transpired to inspire Prof Fukuyama to warn of the rise of a new axis of authoritarian leaders that would include Vladimir Putin of Russia, Xi Jinping of China, Kim Jung-un of North Korea, and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei of Iran who are now collaborating to challenge the hegemony of the Western democracies of the US and EU which seemed secure at the end of the Cold War. Neither did he write of anticipating the rise of Right-wing, authoritarian, political parties in democratic nations as epitomized by Trump’s MAGA movement in the U.S.A.
On the other hand, in his "Afterword" written some 5 years after the shock of the fall of the Twin Towers in NYC on 9/11/2001, Fukuyama did identify Islam as the first of four “challenges to the optimistic, evolutionary scenario that he lays out in The End of History” (p. 347). Nevertheless, the good professor wisely steered clear of the potentially calamitous intellectual sholes associated with political discussions of Zionism. Indeed, the closest he came in The End of History to sharing such politically polarizing thoughts is the following:
“Orthodox Judaism and fundamentalist Islam, by contrast, are totalistic religions that seek to regulate every aspect of human life, both public and private, including the realm of politics. These religions may be compatible with democracy – Islam, in particular, establishes no less than Christianity the principle of universal human equality – but they are very hard to reconcile with liberalism and the recognition of universal human rights, particularly freedom of conscience and religion.” [p. 217]
What Prof Fukuyama is not saying, there, speaks every bit as loudly as what he says. But having also read and greatly enjoyed and benefited from his later works including The Origin of Political Order: From Prehistoric Times to the French Revolution (2011) and Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy (2015), it appears to me that he wants nothing to do with writing about the enduring religious controversy being expressed in today’s Israel-Hamas war which has been with us since long before the British and American, Christian evangelical, post-WWII creation of the Jewish State of Israel. You can learn more about that seminal evangelical influence in Bart Ehrman's Armageddon: What the Bible Really Says about the End (2023), which I reviewed in my Blog post {here} at historyhighjackers.com on Nov. 10, 2023.
For those interested in reading unbiasedly between the political lines, I know of no wiser nor more knowledgeable source than Francis Fukuyama, who is both largely detached from our world’s current, authoritarian-friendly move to the far Right and from its Christian evangelical and Muslim sponsored religious conflicts in the Middle East. In my following Blog post at historyhighjackers.com, I'll review Prof Fukuyama's Liberalism and Its Discontents (2021). In it, he presents a nearly up-to-date analysis of the causes and dangers associated with world-wide threats to the West's liberal democracies which have arisen in the intervening years.
The second in this triumvirate is the deepest intellectually, one might even say profound, yet the most widely misunderstood and often ridiculed. The vast majority of critics, I'm convinced, never actually read the book, as Fukuyama's thesis is sober and thoughtful. Unlike Kennedy's thesis, which is based on relative economic growth rates, or Huntington's, which is rooted (I would argue) in cultural anthropology, Fukuyama's argument is built upon the foundation of modern western philosophy. For those, like me, who only have an armchair education in philosophy, "The End of History" will be both a primer on the basic tenets of liberal political theory and a compelling argument for the spread of both capitalism and democratic representative government.
Fukuyama's argument is direct, but cerebral, and fundamentally grounded in the political philosophy of early 19th century German philosopher Georg Hegel, and supported by the further interpretations of Hegel by fellow German Friedrich Nietzsche and the 20th century French-Russian philosopher Alexandre Kojeve.
At the dawn of the twenty first century, Fukuyama writes, there were two undeniable trends in global affairs: a movement toward market capitalism on the one hand, and a shift toward liberal democracy on the other. He notes that these two trends are not, at least superficially, mutually reinforcing. In fact, one could argue that they should naturally work against each other. After all, authoritarian regimes in East Asia (Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea, China) have proven that dramatic, market-oriented economic growth does not rely on a liberal political order. Indeed, democracy may actually stymie the efficient allocation of central resources toward critical infrastructure projects. Fukuyama sees Hegel's "need for recognition" as the missing link tying liberal economics with liberal political democracy.
This book is broken into five parts. The first two provide a background on the philosophical argument behind "The End of History" as posited by both Hegel and Marx, who agreed on the basics but reached radically different conclusions on the end point. Fukuyama maintains that politics is more like natural science than art or literature - its trajectory is directional and cumulative, with each generation building upon the efforts of the past, unlike the more liberal arts whose value remains subjective across the ages. (e.g. Are paintings or architecture better today than in ancient Greece or fin-de-siecle France? Depends who you ask. Are we more advanced in physics than those societies? No doubt. Fukuyama claims government is more like physics than art.)
I found part three to be the most informative and fascinating. Fukuyama explains that part of the problem with Hegel's focus on "recognition" in political philosophy is that there is no one word in English that accurately captures the true meaning. Machiavelli spoke of "glory," Hobbes of "pride," Rousseau of "amour-propre," Hamilton of "fame," Madison of "ambition," and Nietzsche of "the beast with red cheeks." Fukuyama makes a strong case for Plato's Greek word "thymos," the same word and concept that Jonathan Shay uses to develop his convincing hypothesis on the nature of moral degeneration after close order combat in his brilliant piece "Achilles in Vietnam." In short, every man, no matter his station in life, has a natural sense of self-worth, of dignity, and when that sense of personal dignity is violated the reaction can be severe. When we don't live up to our own estimate of thymos we feel shame, and when we do we feel pride. And when someone else, especially those in positions of power or authority, fail to recognize our thymos we feel indignation (or, as Shay wrote about Achilles and soldiers in Vietnam, rage). Thus, a healthy political order needs to be more than a basic social contract between man and his government, exchanging some personal rights in exchange for the ability to acquire property (what the Founders referred to as "happiness"), a sort of mutual societal non-aggression pact. Rather, it must also somehow serve man's desire for recognition, of his dignity and worth.
In part four Fukuyama presents his central thesis of the desire for recognition as the motor of history, looking at the recent past and projecting into the future some of the different ways the desire for recognition will be manifest. He notes that it was present in the people who fought for greater representation in right-wing authoritarian regimes in the 1970s and 1980s (Spain, Greece, South Korea, Philippines, Taiwan, etc.) and against communist dictatorships at the end of the Cold War - and arguably what is driving the Arab Spring movement across North Africa and the Middle East. The governments rocked by pro-democracy movements span most continents and cultures, include nations that have experienced rapid economic growth and others that have been moribund for decades, and have sought to overthrow or dramatically reform regimes that range from the far left to the far right. The common denominator, Fukuyama argues, is that they failed to satisfy the collective thymos of their people, as only liberal democracy can do that.
The fifth and final chapter addresses the question of the "end of history," what the final end state looks like, the so called "last man," as liberal democracies wrestle with their inherent contradiction that they treat unequal people (i.e. based on talent and success) equally.
In closing, this is a marvelous, thought-provoking book that, in light of the Arab Spring (depending how that turns out), may come back into fashion nearly a generation after its initial publication. Huntington's "Clash of the Civilization" may still stand as the leading interpretation of the post Cold War international order, but "The End of History" is still very much in the race and gaining ground everyday.
Top reviews from other countries

Quality was better than announced too!



