If you haven’t read these two excellent articles: link and link, please read them first. What we will do in this post is simply verify the high-level claim made in these two articles: that a small minority of the Covid-19 vaccine lots are tied to the vast majority of the adverse events and deaths in VAERS and that this is therefore evidence of either ill-intent or horrendous manufacturing practices. The most important caveat to these claims, however, is that we do not have the number of doses which were distributed in each lot. Other than having Project Veritas send someone in to “honey pot” the lot distribution quantity data out of the 3 Pharma companies, not sure how we are getting those numbers anytime soon. And without those numbers, we cannot make our claims with certainty. However, if we can simply verify and duplicate the findings of the two articles, we have something akin to “strong” possibility.

First let’s look at an example of what the lot numbers should look like for each of the three injections. Here is a screenshot from Maine’s Vaccine Lot Management and Expiration document:

As you can see, the lot number for the JNJ shot is generally a 7 digit numeric number. For the Moderna shot it is either a 7 or 9 digit alphanumeric code, and for Pfizer it appears to be a 6 digit alphanumeric code. For the Moderna and JNJ shots, lot numbers can actually be verified to see if they are valid and expired (or not), by going to these two sites to check: Moderna and JNJ. (Have not found one for Pfizer as of yet). Upon spot checking dozens of the lot numbers present in VAERS against these websites, it was discovered, perhaps unsurprisingly, that that many of the lot numbers are not valid, and this is true even when the numbers follow the same exact format as shown in the graphic above. [Side note: an afternoon was also squandered attempting to create a Powershell script to automatically validate every lot number found in VAERS against these two websites, but the attempt was a total fail…if any of you expert programmers out there want to help a brother out, send me an email…]

It should be noted that there was a stunning lack of consistency/standardization in the formatting of the lot numbers in VAERS. The lot number field in the VAERS data entry forms must essentially be a free-form text field that you can type anything into. And obviously, we already know that we cannot rely on the CDC to lift a finger to QC, standardize, or clean up the data. So without any data cleansing at all, many of the valid lot numbers would have shown up in dozens of variations, which would have led to significantly more numbers of lots counted, with each one likely having little to no AEs reported in them. Therefore, pre-cleansing the data was thought to be fairly important. One noteworthy part of this cleansing process was the tossing out of any records that had lot numbers less than 6 digits long. Without boring you with further details, suffice to say that overall, the work needed to get the lot numbers into an acceptably consistent (though not perfect) form became a rather involved cleanup operation (read: royal pain in the a**). In the end, this is the distribution of the number of “true” Lot Numbers that were found:

Manufacturer# of Lot Numbers
Pfizer9507
Moderna8036
JNJ1294
Unknown281

Upon plotting the frequency of occurrence of lots containing various ranges of death numbers on a histogram, we find that 100% of the deaths occurred in just 4.6% of the available lot numbers, which aligns pretty well with the findings in the two aforementioned articles.

If indeed there was a fairly even distribution of doses across all lots, then it would be more than reasonable to conclude that certain lots were intentionally (or accidentally?) manufactured to be more “potent” (read: “lethal”) than others. That being said, the idea that some shots have worse side effects than others certainly seems to comport with the reality on the street: How many people do you know who got the shot and had no complications whatsoever, and then how many do you know who have been injured — mildly, severely, or anything in-between? And worse yet, how many of you know someone who has even been killed by the shots?


Deaths by Lots by Manufacturer, in order from “Hottest” to “Not So Hot” Lots:

[Note: as explained before, some of these numbers do not come back valid when checked against the Moderna and JNJ Lot Number checkers.]

Pfizer Deaths
Moderna Deaths
JNJ Deaths
previous arrow
next arrow


Same thing, but for all Adverse Events:

Pfizer AEs
Moderna AEs
JNJ AEs
previous arrow
next arrow

couldn’t resist…

31 thoughts on “Death by Vaccine LOTtery”
  1. Begs the question and I also see an analysis coming of how many “Expired Doses” were administered and not counted as a administration error? It’s bad enough the VAERS system gives themselves a “positive credit” for error, when errors flush out as a “None Above”, “Not Serious” event. Look Momma safe and effective, see how many reports are not serious?! I’ve already found a few good ones, but I want to find a perm disability or deaths against a expired lot!

  2. Thanks for all you do! Is there any Canadian stats available on va666 injuries and death north of the 49th?

    God bless,

    Donna

  3. […] international research teams systematically examined the VAERS database and recently discovered that as of October 31, 2021, all serious side effects and deaths reported in the USA only relate […]

  4. […] Inzwischen haben mehrere internationale Forscher-Teams die USA-Nebenwirkungsdatenbank VAERS systematisch untersucht und schon am 31. Oktober 2021 festgestellt, dass sämtliche ernsten Nebenwirkungen und Todesfälle, die in den USA gemeldet wurden, nur auf einen sehr kleinen Teil der Chargen (Batches or Lots) zurückzuführen sind (Hier ein Bericht von der offiziellen VAERS-Seite). […]

  5. […] Inzwischen haben mehrere internationale Forscher-Teams die USA-Nebenwirkungsdatenbank VAERS systematisch untersucht und schon am 31. Oktober 2021 festgestellt, dass sämtliche ernsten Nebenwirkungen und Todesfälle, die in den USA gemeldet wurden, nur auf einen sehr kleinen Teil der Chargen (Batches or Lots) zurückzuführen sind (Hier ein Bericht von der offiziellen VAERS-Seite). […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *