CARDINAL MALCOLM RANJIT AND THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS

Cardinal Malcolm Ranjit believes that the Syllabus of Errors no more applies today.Perhaps  because those saved in invincible ignorance and with implicit desire are known exceptions. Vatican Council II though does not state that they are known exceptions.One has to assume it.

Vatican Council II (LG 16) just mentions invincible ignorance and being saved with a good conscience. Just mentions it! That’s all! It does no imply, assume, insinuate, suggest or claim that these are exceptions to the dogma on salvation or the Syllabus of Errors.

Since Cardinal Ranjit would make this assumption, personally, he could write off the Syllabus of Errors which was a surprise for me when I first heard him mention this.

It’s irrational for him to support the Syllabus of Errors since he ‘knows’ , that Fr.Leonard Feeney did not accept the baptism of desire as an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The Cardinal Archbishop of Boston and the Holy Office ‘knew’ that the baptism of desire was a known exception to the literal interpretation of the dogma.

So now  Cardinal Ranjit knows, that the Syllabus of Errors is no more valid for our time since the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church suggest (?) that there are known explicit, exceptions to the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church. They do not!

Of course we can see the error in all this but who is going to inform the Sri Lankan cardinal and also the others who will participate in the conference on the Sacred Liturgy to be held in Rome in  2013.

I remember Cardinal Ranjit would visit the Maria Mater Ecclesia seminary in Rome where three seminarians whom he knew were studying to become priests. Two of them are probably now priests .At the Maria Mater Ecclesia seminary they would say Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for denying the baptism of desire. For the Rector and seminarians there, at this Legionary of Christ seminary in Rome, the baptism of desire was a known exception to the dogma on salvation. I know, I was a seminarian there at that time.

Similarly at the Beda Pontifical College Rome they also taught that the baptism of desire was a known exception to the dogma, when I would affirm the literal interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus. I didn’t last for more than a month in either seminary.

For the cardinal to claim innocently that the baptism of desire is a known exception is irrationality. It’s not his fault in the sense that many in the church would say the same. Perhaps also Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger at that time. That it is heresy also they may not know.

However it would be said that after being informed they offer Mass without any public clarification.-Lionel Andrades

Cardinal Malcolm Ranjit expects the SSPX to reject the Syllabus of Errors as he does and then accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the irrational red column

 

Cardinal Malcolm Ranjit, the Archbishop of Colombo, has said that if the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX ) is given canonical status he would invite them to his seminary to train students in Colombo;Sri Lanka. What he has not said, is  that he would expect the SSPX, like his seminarians, to reject the Syllabus of Errors and also accept Vatican Council II as he does.

For Cardinal Ranjit the Syllabus of Errors would not be compatible with Vatican Council II 1 since he uses the right hand side ( red) column instead of the left hand side (blue) column in the interpretation of the Council.

If he chose to use the blue column then Vatican Council II would not contradict the Syllabus of Errors.

Here it is.

 

All salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3).seeds of the Word (AG 11), good and holy things in other religions or ' a ray of the Truth' (NA 2) are either:

LEFT HAND COLUMN................................. RIGHT HAND COLUMN

implicit                                                          or explicit for us.

hypothetical                                                  or known in reality.

invisible                                                         or visible in the flesh.

dejure ( in principle)                                     or defacto ( in fact ).

subjective                                                      or objective.

He and his staff are still not willing to interpret Vatican Council II using the rational blue column.

 -Lionel Andrades

1.

Now when he was informed the cardinal was not willing to say that the Syllabus of Errors was in perfect agreement with Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/12/now-when-he-was-informed-cardinal-was.html

 

 

Padre Pio Prayer Groups, Neo Catechumenal Way, Charismatic Renewal, Legion of Mary,Opus Dei, all the religious communities, Diocesan priests...interpret Islam and other religions with an irrationality

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/12/padre-pio-prayer-groups-neo.html

Since outside the Church there is no salvation, the marriage to a Protestant is not a Sacrament and the Catholic spouse is living in adultery. So in Germany the Catholic spouse of a Protestant too, should not be given the Eucharist at Mass.They are living in scandal and adultery.

SYLLABUS OF ERRORS IS NOT DEAD IN GERMANY
The Syllabus of Errors is not dead in Germany.We now know what creates a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors when reading Vatican Council II and so can avoid it.When there is no rupture with the Syllabus in  Vatican Council II or the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994),this would be bad news for the German bishops who give the Eucharist at Mass to Protestants.It would mean Protestants are out of the Church and are oriented to Hell, the marriage is not a Sacrament and the couple are living in adultery.

FOR PROPAGANDA FIDE AND THE CDF THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS WAS OBSOLETE

Cardinal Malcolm Ranjit told me over 10 years back at his Propaganda Fide office, near Piazza Spagna that the Church no more teaches the Syllabus of Errors. It had been done away with for him. It was dead.

Similarly the 150th anniversary of the Syllabus of Errors in 2014 was not celebrated by Pope Benedict and the Vatican. Since for Pope Benedict too, Vatican Council II is 'a development' of the Syllabus, just as it is 'a development' of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) for him.
VATICAN COUNCIL II FEENEYITE DOES NOT CONTRADICT THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS ON ECUMENISM AND OTHER RELIGIONS
But now we know that Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors on ecumenism and other religions. 

It is only with Vatican Council II (Cushingite), that there is a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors and the dogma EENS becomes obsolete.

So when the Syllabus of Errors is not contradicted by Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) how can there be a new ecumenism ? How can there be known salvation outside the Church, a new evangelisation etc? It is only  based upon there being known people saved outside the Church that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the hermeneutic of discontinuity with EENS.

CARDINAL RANJIT'S OFFICE DOES NOT ANSWER

So a few years back via e-mail when I brought this to the attention of the Staff of Cardinal Ranjit they refused to answer.They said that the cardinal was travelling. After some time I again e-mailed them in Sri Lanka and there was no reply from the priest who assists Cardinal Ranjit.
Cardinal Ranjit was not going to proclaim Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS.
ONLY UPON THE FALSE PREMISE THE NEW ECUMENISM WAS CREATED

By now some of the liberal bishops in Germany would be learning that Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) is in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors and there can only be an ecumenism of return.Theologically there is no opening for the New Ecumenism, since the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) do not refer any more, to visible and known people saved outside the Church.It was only upon the false premise (visible for us BOD,BOB, I.I etc )that the New Ecumenism was created.

They wrongly asssumed that there was known salvation outside the Church and then wrongly inferred that other Christians do not need to convert. In other words theoretical possibilities were actual examples of the Anonymous Christian saved outside the Church.

So sometime back in an interview, Archbishop Augustine Di Noia said that the Anonymous Christian theory is rejected.This was false. Since in the interview with Edwin Pentin for the National Catholic Register, Di Noia said that  EENS was obsolete today since he knew of an Anglican, outside the Church who would be saved. This is was his example of an Anonymous Christian.He was saying that he could judge like Jesus,on the Day of Judgement,  and would know of a non Catholic who would be saved outside the Church. He was also saying that this person would be an exception to the dogma EENS and this was something he already knew.Of course this is irrational and this is the reasoning used by the liberal German bishops at inter faith marriages.
But with Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise, EENS ( interpreted without the false premise) is not changed. The old Feeneyite ecclesiology on exclusive salvation is not changed.So  we are back to the Syllabus of Errors.

It means that the Protestant who marries a Catholic is out of the Church according to the Old Ecumenism which isn ot contradicted by Vatican Council II (F).

Similarly since outside the Church there is no salvation, the marriage to a Protestant is not a Sacrament.The Catholic spouse is living in adultery. So in Germany the Catholic spouse of a Protestant too, should not be given the Eucharist at Mass.There would be the sin of scandal and adultery.-Lionel Andrades

JULY 16, 2018

Can you imagine Cardinal Ranjit saying that all non Catholics in Sri Lanka are on the way to Hell unless they entered the Catholic Church before death?       http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/can-you-imagine-cardinal-ranjit-saying.html

JULY 29, 2015

Vatican Council II would contradict the Syllabus of Errors for the Vatican Curia, SSPX, SBC and sedevacantists.Since for them LG 16 refers to objective cases

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/07/vatican-council-ii-would-contradict.html

 JANUARY 9, 2015

The 150th anniversary of the Syllabus of Errors is not being celebrated in the Catholic Church since the CDF assumes there are known exceptions to Pope Pius IX in Vatican Council II  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/01/the-150-anniversary-of-syllabus-of.html

JULY 14, 2015

Vatican Council II (UR ,DH) would contradict Mortalium Animos, Quanta Cura, Syllabus of Errors only if B is an exception to A   

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/07/vatican-council-ii-ur-dh-would.html

Vatican Council II says outside the Church there is no salvation and is in agreement with the Syllabus of Errors, Mystici Corporis,Quanto Conficiamus etc.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/sspx-can-accept-vatican-council-ii-in.html

No text in Quanto Conficiamur Moerore or the Council of Trent says there are exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/04/no-text-in-quanto-conficiamur-moerore.html

On ecumenism, other religions, religious liberty, proclaiming the Good News and evangelisation is B an exception to A for you ? It is not for me

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/on-ecumenism-other-religions-religious.html

FEBRUARY 16, 2015

Without the Marchetti inference Vatican Council II does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/02/without-marchetti-inference-vatican.html

DECEMBER 9, 2014

Now when he was informed the cardinal was not willing to say that the Syllabus of Errors was in perfect agreement with Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2014/12/now-when-he-was-informed-cardinal-was.html


_________________________________

SSPX must ask Bishops Conferences in the USA, UK, Italy, etc to affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) or not make the Council an issue for reconciliation

VATICAN-SSPX TALKS DEAD WITHOUT VATICAN COUNCIL II ( FEENEYITE)

The Vatican-SSPX talks are dead if the SSPX does not use Feeeneyism to interpret Vatican Council II.The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican wants to hide the truth.The SSPX cannot accept Vatican Council II ( Cushingite).It is a dead-end.And they are correct in not accepting a heretical version of the Council which is a rupture with Tradition.

EXPOSE OBJECTIVE ERROR OF PRESENT MAGISTERIUM

The SSPX needs to explore Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and expose the objective error of Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) approved by the present magisterium.

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J must be told in public that there are no practical exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in 2017 and there are no physically known cases of being saved in invincible ignorance of the Gospel through no fault of one's own (I.I), the baptism of desire(BOD) or the baptism of blood (BOB), with or without the baptism of water.So in Vatican Council II there are no exceptions mentioned to the old ecclesiology.The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which Cardinal Ladaria supports made an objective error.So without this mistake, Feeneyism is the interpretative theology for Vatican Council II today.All magisterial documents must be seen through the Feeneyite lens. It is the only rational option.

LADARIA MADE FACTUAL MISTAKES IN TWO ITC PAPERS

They should ask Cardinal Ladaria to respond to the blog post,Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.j made factual errors in two ITC theological papers which were politically correct 1. He made an objective mistake in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission where he was the President and Secretary.

CARD.LADARIA'S PROFESSIO FIDEO WAS CUSHINGITE

Also when he assumed office as the Secretary of the CDF he recited the Profession of Faith( Nicene Creed/ Professio Fideo) based on irrational Cushingism.So it was not 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' but 'I believe in three or more known baptisms, desire, blood and invincible ignorance, and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'.This is fantasy and heresy.

MULLER- DI NOIA CORRECTION NEEDED

The same fantasy and heresy was there when Cardinal Muller and Archbishop Di Noia was asked about EENS by Edward Pentin in an interview for the National Catholic Register.They interpreted Vatican Council II with invisible-people-are-visible-Cushingite theology.The CDF should issue a correction.

POPE BENEDICT'S 'DEVELOPMENT' CUSHINGITE

A correction is also required for Pope Benedict's statement in March 2016.In the Avvenire interview he said that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries of the 16th century. There was ' a development' with Vatican Council II ( he meant Cushingite).

USCCB ERROR IN FR.PETER C. PHAN CASE
Similar to Pope Benedict, Cardinal Donald Wuerl, head of the Doctrinal Committe of the USCCB assumed invisible baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance in the present times,were exceptions to the traditional exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.In other words they are explicit for him.Otherwise they could not be exceptions.This was the mistake the USCCB made in the Fr.Peter C. Phan case.

CARD.MALCOLM RANJIT SETS ASIDE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS
Since invisible cases in Vatican Council II; hypothetical cases for us, are visible exceptions to EENS for Pope Benedict and Pope Francis, there is salvation outside the Church for them.So understandably Cardinal Malcolm Ranjit told me that the Syllabus of Errors was no more relevant in the present times for him.There would be a new ecumenism with known salvation outside the Church.

SSPX'S VATICAN COUNCIL II (CUSHINGITE) WAS A MISTAKE
So the SSPX spokesman must announce that in the past the SSPX interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism and it was a mistake.With Cushingite theology ( invisible people are visible exceptions to EENS), Vatican Council II becomes a break with EENS and the rest of Tradition.

NOVUS ORDO MASS WITH OLD ECCLESIOLOGY POSSIBLE NOW
With Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) we are back to the old ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass. So the Novus Ordo Mass can also be offered with the ecclesiology of the missionaries of the 16th century.There is no development with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).

ALL RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES MUST USE VATICAN COUNCIL ( FEENEYITE)
The SSPX spokesman should appeal to all Catholic religious communities and ecclesiastics at the CDF, to affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) as they have done( will do).

ASK FSSP PRIESTS TO RECITE THE NICENE CREED WITH FEENEYISM

They should appeal to liberal bishops to ask the FSSP priests to interpret the Nicene Creed only with Feeneyism.Similarly catechesis and religious instruction by Chancery offices must only be based on rational Feeneyism( invisible cases are just invisible).

BOUQUETS OF ROSARIES
It is good that the SSPX offers many bouquets of rosaries for a reconciliation in the Church; for unity on doctrine.But if every year I write about the same thing and they do nothing about it they cannot blame Our Lady .Without her help I would not be on this blog for so long and on the same subject.

DOCTRINALLY AND TRADITIONALLY SSPX SECURE
Doctrinally and traditionally the SSPX are in a secure position. They simply have to present the Feeneyite theology and doctrine in public and every one will understand.If the bishops conferences in the USA, U.K, Germany, Australia, Italy etc will not affirm Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) then the SSPX should ask Pope Francis and Cardinal Ladaria to not make Vatican Council II an issue for the reconciliation of the SSPX.They should be granted a personal prelature and canonical recognition with no conditions and the dialogue can continue.-Lionel Andrades

1.
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/cardinal-luiz-l…

 MARCH 27, 2017

Council of Trent can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/council-of-trent-can-be-interpreted.html

TERMS EXPLAINED

I interpret the following terms with Feeneyism and the two popes and the cardinals do so with Cushingism (so does the SSPX).

I use Feeneyism and Pope Benedict XVI, Cardinal Muller, Bishop Bernard Fellay, Bishop Mark Pirvanus, Bishop Donald Sanborn and the sedevacantists Michael and Peter Dimond   use Cushingism.

For me the Baptism of Desire is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For me Invincible Ignorance is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For me Vatican Council II is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.

For me Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For the Dimond Brothers extra ecclesiam nulla salus is Feeneyite but they reject the baptism of desire which isCushingite for them.

For me the Nicene Creed is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.

For me the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Bostonis Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.

I avoid the New Theology, while they uses it.

For me the Catechism of the Catholic Church is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.

The present magisterium separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water.I do not.

-Lionel Andrades

TERMS EXPLAINED

Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.

Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.

Baptism of Desire (Feeneyite): It refers to the hypothetical case of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is an invisible case in our reality it is not relevant to the dogma EENS.

Baptism of Desire (Cushingite): It refers to the known case of a catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is a visible case or the SSPX it is relevant to the dogma EENS.

Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite): This refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.

Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite): This refers to the explicit case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since it is an exception to the dogma EENS it is assumed to be objectively known in particular cases.This reasoning is irrational.

Council of Florence: One of the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS.It did not mention any exceptions.It did not mention the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.

Liberal theologians: They reinterpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as objective cases, known in the present times.They use Cushingism.

Vatican Council II (Cushingite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II withCushingism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS.

Vatican Council II (Feeneyite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II withFeeneyism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell).

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston: It assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times. So it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant to EENs.From the second part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.It was Cushingite.

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( Feeneyite). It means accepting the Letter as Feeneyite based on the first part,only .It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.The traditional interpretatiion of the dogma EENS does not mention any exceptions.

Letter of the Holy Office ( Cushingite). It is based on the second part of the Letter.It rejects the traditional interpretation of EENS. Since it considers the baptism of desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and being saved in invincible ignorance ( Cushingite-explicit cases) as being exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes hypothetical cases are objectively visible and so they are exceptions to the first part of the Letter.

Baltimore Catechism: It assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it like the baptism of water.The Baltimore Catechism is accepted with the confusion.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.

Catechism of Pope X: It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.It can be interpreted withCushingism or Feeneyism.

Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) ; It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means there are more than three known baptisms. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc.This is a Cushingite interpretation.

Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.It is Feeneyite.

New Theology: It refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma EENS.With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with Tradition.It's basis is Cushingism.

Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite): .It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions.

Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Feeneyite): It refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.There are no known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell.

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite): CCC 1257 does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since there are no known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. There are no known exceptions, since God is not limited to the Sacraments.

When CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the dogmatic teaching on all needin to formally enter the Church. CCC 846 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvatioon.

Council of Trent : A Feeneyite does not separate the baptism of water from the baptism of desire.The baptism of desire will be followed by the baptism of water.

Council of Trent : A Cushingite separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water.

________________________