“He presents the strange theory that Francis denies the truth ‘in practice’ but ‘not by words’.” !!!
Practically speaking, Francis is DENYING THE TRUTH!!!
As far as it goes, Francis used words, not spoken out loud, but in writing, when he wrote to the bishops in South America to say that their interpretation of Amoris Laetitia was the way it should be interpreted. Sadly, they were talking about giving Holy Communion to the divorced and remarried who were still living in their sins. It looks like that’s denying the TRUTH by words.
If someone saw all of that play out, along with a lot of the other nonsense, and still didn’t see through him, then, it makes me think of that old adage that “no man is so blind as he who refuses to see.”
I have admired Bishop Schneider for his great reverence for Jesus in the Holy Eucharist. However, I do not understand his stance on all of this, especially in regards to Francis’, aka Bergoglio’s, poor treatment of Jesus in the Holy Eucharist. I pray that Bishop Schneider and the other bishops and cardinals see through the great fog surrounding Francis/Bergoglio and his words and deeds. Please, pray that they will see the truth and proclaim it for the sake of the whole, true Catholic Church. Thank you.

I heard that Mother Teresa was very sad seeing people receive the Holy Eucharist/Jesus in the hand rather than on the tongue. Also, I heard a woman, who lives solely off of the Holy Eucharist for over 12 years, say that it hurts her to see so many people receiving in their hands and they drop crumbs from the Host onto the floor where they are trampled on... and the abuses and stealing of the Hosts are terrible... Sometimes the priests find the Host tucked into hymnals or worse, people try to steal the Host for mocking or sacrileges and black masses...

Thanks to Gloria TV and Frank Walker of Canon212! I read Canon212 daily and often read Gloria TV articles linked from Canon212. I had a solid Catholic education from solid Catholic schools using the Baltimore catechism and learned more from Mother Angelica’s EWTN programs. Thankfully, since finding Canon212, I’ve learned and continue to learn a great deal about the Catholic Church, her history, the faith, and what’s truly going on in America and the world, today. I’m constantly updating others on what’s really going on and can easily link to the articles thanks to Canon212. With all of the so-called “Catholic” press out there fawning over a possibly heretical pope or even anti-pope, it’s so good to be able to read the truth, including the actual quotations of what is said or written. From all that I’ve read and learned, I highly recommend Canon212 and Gloria TV... and I do not get any commission for saying so. Thank you and God bless Canon212 and Gloria TV and all those people making them possible and their families.

That man is NOT the priest and it is NOT OK for him to just take Jesus and carry Him in the Host to someone else in the crowd, whether there are people there in wheelchairs or not. If the priest wants to give Holy Communion to those who are disabled, that’s fine. However, that man, a non- priest and just someone coming up to receive, is NOT to just take it upon himself to deliver Jesus in the Host to others there.

The old man took the Host in his hand and walked away with Jesus still in his hand. That is completely wrong! We can blame him and ask why no one stopped him. I wonder how many people steal the Host for black masses and just walk away as this old man had done, unhindered, never stopped or even stalled...? He may not have had any evil intentions whatsoever, but what he did was definitely wrong! Someone needs to teach him. And for the record, it’s not okay to go get Holy Communion to pass along to your family members or relatives, even if they are in wheelchairs. This is not a cafeteria, for Heaven’s sake! That is Jesus!

I found this in the comments section on a Catholic news site or blog. I’m sorry I’ve forgotten just where. Anyway, here is the quote,...
“Father Gianfranco Ghirlanda, former rector of the Gregorian University, studied the past millennia of canonical tradition concerning the loss of papal office. Such an extensive study by a canonist of his caliber is quite rare, and hence his findings should carry great weight. This is what he wrote about the topic in an article published in 2013 by Civiltà Cattolica:
–
Fr. Gianfranco Ghirlanda: “The vacancy of the Roman See occurs in case of the cessation of the office on the part of the Roman Pontiff, which happens for four reasons: 1) Death, 2) Sure and perpetual insanity or complete mental infirmity; 3) Notorious apostasy, heresy, schism; 4) Resignation. In the first case, the Apostolic See is vacant from the moment of death of the Roman Pontiff; IN THE SECOND AND IN THE THIRD FROM THE MOMENT OF THE DECLARATION ON THE PART OF THE CARDINALS; in the fourth from the moment of the renunciation.”
–
He went on to explain that the Cardinals do not depose the pope, but only declared the fact of his heresy. It is “from the moment of the declaration on the part of the Cardinals” that the see becomes vacant, NOT BEFORE.
–
In the case of Francis, there have been no solemn warnings and no declaration from the Cardinals. Hence, he remains pope...”