De Mattei vs. Viganò: Why Not Simply Rebut Ideas?
“I am concerned about a certain conspiracy theorism used by Archbishop Viganò to impose a narrative without a rational foundation,” he writes on CorrispondenzaRomana.it (June 30). Viganò may accuse him of being a conspiracy denier.
A promoter of Covid vaccinations, de Mattei also fears that Archbishop Viganò is used to promote an “anti-vax religion” He adds, “For anyone who rejects the anti-vax faith, excommunication is at the ready.” In the real world, it’s the opposite: The “vax religion” excommunicates those rejecting the vax faith.
Seemingly seriously, de Mattei insinuates that there is a claim “to entrust to Archbishop Viganò a salvific mission within the Church” and blames Viganò for his bold statements on Francis. He repeats his conspiracy theory that Viganò’s positions are “the result of a certain manipulation” although Viganò strongly denied this.
De Mattei even turns Viganò’s words that Francis has surrounded himself with a “magic circle of perverts” against Viganò, although Viganò – unlike Francis - never defended perversion.
In the beginning of his article, de Mattei correctly criticises the fact that today “the truth becomes personalised.” So, why not simply rebut Viganò’s ideas?
Picture: Roberto de Mattei, #newsLxnmozdiax