Clicks140
Lionel L. Andrades

Polish bishops and President are also part of 'the false church': interpret the Catechism(1995) differently

May 16, 2017

Polish bishops and President are also part of 'the false church': interpret the Catechism(1995) differently

So there are no practical exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) so why cannot we interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995) knowing this?
We cannot do this. Since the Jewish Left rabbis representing Israel will not allow it.They have changed Church doctrine and all of us have to follow it during catechesis, evangelisation,mission, religious education,recitation of the Nicene Creed,interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism, new theology and ecclesiology during even the Traditional Latin Mass etc.This is 'the false church' imposed upon us, this is 'the new ideology' accepted by the two popes.

This is the false church and new ideology even in the Catholic Church in Poland a Catholic country.It is the subtle and official ideology of the sedevacantists and the SSPX.Have you ever heard a sedevacantist affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS?No!
I have affirmed it so many times why not the Society of St. Pius X? Not once has the SSPX affirmed in public the dogma EENS in harmony with Vatican Council II.
Instead they interpret LG 16, LG8, UR 3, NA 2 etc with 'the ideology'.

Has any one recently read Bishop Donald Sanborn saying all Jews and Muslims are on the way to Hell with no exceptions?No.He does not say it.Since for him invisible for us baptism of desire is conveniently an exception to the dogma EENS as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.
So the sedevacantist Bishop Pirvanus too did not object when Pope Benedict said EENS was not more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century, there was a development with Vatican Council II.
There is a development with Vatican Council II when invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS also for the Polish Bishops and the President of Poland.They interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church not as I do.They are part of the false church within the Catholic Church, the false church is composed of sedevacantists, liberals, traditionalists,magisterium, popes and cardinals. What joins them all is the New Theology, Cushingite theology.It is a rupture with St.John Bosco,St. Thomas Aquinas and the past Church Councils which defined the dogma EENS.
So in Poland there is a rupture with the dogma EENS and so there is a separation of Church and State, theologically and doctrinally.They are not aware of it in Poland and so no one can do anything about it.

The Polish Conference of Bishops must assume the obvious :that there are no practical exceptions known in Poland to the dogma EENS as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.Pope Benedict made a mistake in March 2016 in the interview published in daily Avvenire.Since every one needs to be a member of the Church to avoid Hell.There should be no separation of Church and State theologically and doctrinally.Every one needs to enter the Church is still the priority.
The Polish bishops must announce that Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the dogma EENS.So there is no reason to have a separation of Church and State based on Vatican Council II.The separation of Church and State is a foreign ideology.There is no rational theology to support it.The laws of the Catholic Church can be the laws of the land in Poland.The faith(salvation) and moral theology of the Church can be implemented by their National Assembly.
The secular ideology in general represents Satan.It does not represent God as he is known in the Catholic Church outside of which there is no salvation.The Catholic bishops Conference in Poland must oppose the secular ideology on faith and morals issues and announce that outside the Church there is no salvation and they have a moral obligation to say it in public as Catholics.
They could affirm the dogma EENS as it was known to St. Stanislas Kotska, St. Faustina Kowalska and St. Maximillian Kolbe.They did not interpret the dogma EENS with the new theology, with Cushingite theology, which assumes invisible people, people in Heaven are visible exceptions on earth to all needing 'faith and baptism' in the Catholic Church to go
to Heaven.
Since the dogma EENS is not contradicted by Vatican Council , the Catechism of the Catholic Church can be interpreted rationally i.e with invisible cases not being visible exceptions to all needing to be formal members of the Catholic Church to avoid the fires of Hell.
The Polish Bishops Conference could clarify that the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995) is being interpreted with Cushingism; with the New Theology and it can also be interpreted with Feeneyism, which avoids the New Theology.
Similarly the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II is being interpreted with the irrational premise and conclusion and there is an alternative for the Polish people-avoid the irrational premise and the conclusion is traditional and non heretical.CCC 846 and CCC1257 are not exceptions to EENS.Similarly when Vatican Council II (LG 14) refers to those 'who know', it is a reference to invisible cases in 2017. So LG 14 also does not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
So the Polish Parliament as Catholics can affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King in which the pre and post Vatican Council II ecclesiology is the same: it is exclusivist ecclesiocentrism.The Parliament can affirm the moral and salvation theology of the Church, according to the missionaries and magisterium of the 16th century.It is not in conflict with magisterial documents today re-interpreted with rational philosophy and theology.-Lionel Andrades