Tesa

Viganò, the Covid: an Infernal Plan and the Persecution of the Last Times

8 Maggio 2021 Marco Tosatti Dear friends and enemies of Stilum Curia we publish the speech that Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò gave at the Summit …
Ultraviolet
"By all means supply any evidence of his motive or even any if you can. " @Saveusfromhell I already did in my first reply. I repeat. "The Archbishop routinely gives speeches and interviews to promote his views and, by extension, himself. One does not do so unless one wants attention.. Motive shown." You simply refuse address the motive I've shown. What you need to do is show is giving intervi…More
"By all means supply any evidence of his motive or even any if you can. " @Saveusfromhell I already did in my first reply. I repeat. "The Archbishop routinely gives speeches and interviews to promote his views and, by extension, himself. One does not do so unless one wants attention.. Motive shown." You simply refuse address the motive I've shown. What you need to do is show is giving interviews and speeches isn't evidence for a man seeking attention. (i.e. his motive) and you can't do that

"all you have cited is that he does his job as an archbishop infoming the laity." Wrong. I didn't cite that at all. Strawman fallacy on your part. That's your justification for his motive and you've given it before. Argumentum ad Nauseam fallacy on your part. I've already addressed your justification when I said, "His reasons for seeking attention doesn't change the fact he is seeking attention." ...and again, you didn't address that either.

"Your (why would i care,but if that is all you have it's a clear indication you know your wrong.)"

You still haven't learned the difference between "you're" and "your". That garbled setence isn't "a clear indication" of anything except how inflamed your butthurt truly is. My compliments on your "jewtroll" propaganda gimmick. Seems you've learned from your mentor. ;-)
Ultraviolet
It's conclusion of motive based on his actions, not a judgement of his motive. @Saveusfromhell Get your terminology straight. You haven't disproven my conclusion either. Labelling it as "rash" is not the same thing as showing it is or that it's incorrect..You'd best learn that. First, learn the difference between "your" and "you're". :D
2 more comments from Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet
Wrong. I've won because I proven my claims therby disproving yours. ;-) @Saveusfromhell

"You have assumed my motive and are wrong. You have assumed Archbishop's motive but have not proven by any means that he is begging attention."

Unsupported claims don't become true simply because you make them, bunky. You asked for proof of Vigano's motive and I've supplied it. I've also shown proof …More
Wrong. I've won because I proven my claims therby disproving yours. ;-) @Saveusfromhell

"You have assumed my motive and are wrong. You have assumed Archbishop's motive but have not proven by any means that he is begging attention."

Unsupported claims don't become true simply because you make them, bunky. You asked for proof of Vigano's motive and I've supplied it. I've also shown proof of your motive. The onus now is for you to factually disprove what I've shown and you have not done so.

"by warning the faithful is his job as an archbishop."

His reasons for seeking attention doesn't change the fact he is seeking attention. Try again, darling. :P
Ultraviolet
@Saveusfromhell Wrong again. :D The Archbishop routinely gives speeches and interviews to promote his views and, by extension, himself. One does not do so unless one wants attention.. Motive shown. ;-)

When you throw the word "Jew" as an insult, you also throw it at the Son of God and the Holy Family. I've beaten you every time you tried defending your stupid anti-Semitic ideology. Your …More
@Saveusfromhell Wrong again. :D The Archbishop routinely gives speeches and interviews to promote his views and, by extension, himself. One does not do so unless one wants attention.. Motive shown. ;-)

When you throw the word "Jew" as an insult, you also throw it at the Son of God and the Holy Family. I've beaten you every time you tried defending your stupid anti-Semitic ideology. Your hateful name-calling shows you recognize that as well, evidenced by your choice of abuse. Now I'm stating your motive and I just factually supported that claim as well. You lose. Again. :D pic related.
Ultraviolet
You're assuming a motive you can't prove. @Saveusfromhell You're also introducing Judaism in totally irrelevant subject. Typical anti-Semite failed logic, topic shifting and general stupidity. Protip: Jesus was a Jew. So was The Blessed Mother and St. Joseph her spouse.
Jeffrey Ade
According to St. Paul if you believe in Jesus your a child of Abraham so we're all jews!
Ultraviolet
@Jeffrey Ade ...a statement corroborated by Pope Piux XII in 1938. ;-)
Ultraviolet
Medieval clerics insisted The Black Death was "The Last Times" too. Stay classy, Abp. (Always Begging Publicity) Vigano