en.news

17 2.5KJan 27, 2020

Bishop Barron, Follow Your Own Advice: Name The “Hateful” Websites!

Los Angeles Auxiliary Bishop Robert Barron calls on bishops to publicly approve or reject Catholic websites and social media accounts.

Neoconservative Barron told NcRegister.com (January 24) that bishops should exercise their authority in the digital sphere just as John Paul II called [in vain] for the bishops to exercise greater supervision of universities.

Barron expects bishops to point out when people on social media are “harming” the Church.

He warned that, “there are, to be blunt, a disconcerting number of such people on social media who are trading in hateful, divisive speech, often deeply at odds with the theology of the Church and who are, sadly, having a powerful impact on the people of God.”

However, while lamenting “hateful” and “divisive” websites, Barron doesn’t mention one of them by name although he asks bishops to do so.

Further, experience shows that neoconservative prelates like to attack Catholic websites like Gloria.tv, ChurchMilitant.com or LifeSiteNews.com because these pages expose their empty words.

Picture: Robert Barron, © Mazur/catholicnews.org.uk

LikeShare

GChevalier

Jan 29, 2020

Monseigneur Barron, suivez vos propres conseils : Nommez les sites web « haineux » !
catholique.forumactif.com/t666-news-au-29-janvier-2020
L'évêque auxiliaire de Los Angeles, Robert Barron, appelle les évêques à approuver ou à rejeter publiquement les sites web et les comptes de médias sociaux catholiques.

Le néoconservateur Barron a déclaré à NcRegister.com (24 janvier) que les évêques devraient exercer leur autorité dans la sphère numérique, tout comme Jean-Paul II a demandé [en vain] que les évêques exercent une plus grande supervision des universités.

Mgr Barron attend des évêques qu'ils signalent les cas où les personnes présentes sur les médias sociaux « nuisent » à l'Église.

Il a averti que, « il y a, pour être franc, un nombre déconcertant de ces personnes sur les médias sociaux qui font du commerce de discours haineux et de division, souvent en contradiction profonde avec la théologie de l'Église et qui, malheureusement, ont un impact puissant sur le peuple de Dieu ».

Cependant, tout en déplorant les sites web « haineux » et « qui divisent », Mgr Barron ne mentionne le nom d'aucun d'entre eux bien qu'il demande aux évêques de le faire.

De plus, l'expérience montre que les prélats néoconservateurs aiment attaquer les sites web catholiques comme Gloria.tv, ChurchMilitant.com ou LifeSiteNews.com parce que ces pages exposent leurs discours fades.

[Voilà comment l'Antéchrist envoie partout ses tueurs à gages !]

GChevalier links to this post

Jan 29, 2020

De Profundis

Jan 28, 2020

Barron holds that hell may be empty, and that Adam and Eve are literary myths (and that if you hold to the historicity of our first parents you're a ham fisted fundamentalist.)

Thors Catholic Hammer

Jan 30, 2020

Like many” bishops” Barron proceeds on the basis that most people agree with him. When faced with opposition the tactic is to change the subject and move on as though the great consensus still existed.
If Barron was appointed by the antipope then his episcopacy is illicit.

Lalanz

Jan 28, 2020

The lost look in his face

Lalanz

Jan 28, 2020

Pray for him he is lost

Thors Catholic Hammer

Jan 30, 2020

But he doesn’t know he is lost.
That’s what makes the antipope so dangerous.
The prayers should be for the removal of antipope Francis from the life of the Catholic Church.

Thors Catholic Hammer

Jan 28, 2020

All episcopal appointments by any antipope such as “Francis” are illicit.
Barron therefore has no legally based spiritual authority.
He can therefore and indeed ought be entirely ignored.

De Profundis

Jan 28, 2020

Could we start this with Bishops? Labelling if they are "in full communion of the Church"?

Thors Catholic Hammer

Jan 30, 2020

Nothing can be done until the anti papacy of Francis 1st is removed from the life of the Catholic Church.

HerzMariae

Jan 28, 2020

Some context, Crux editor John Allen became part of Barron's "Word on Fire" as an Institute Fellow. As Mr. Allen called Conservative bloggers "Taliban Catholics", this fits like a glove.

De Profundis

Jan 28, 2020

Barron told Jewish Ben Shapiro that Jesus Christ is only the "privileged way of salvation".

AngelusMaria

Jan 29, 2020

I heard that interview. Barron did a great disservice to Ben by not proclaiming the Gospel and fulfilling his apostolic mandate to preach the Gospel to all nations. "Whoever denies me before men, I shall deny them before my Father."

tearlach

3Jan 27, 2020

HE DOES NOT BELIEVE IN ETERNAL DAMNATION AND HELL IS NOT VERY CLEAR IN THE WAY HE PUTS IT. I WAS VERY DISAPPOINTED AT HIM WHEN HE WAS A PRIEST AND NOW A BISHOP, PHHHH... WHAT ELSE? AS IF WE DID NOT HAVE ENOUGH WITH THE ANTI POPE FRANCISCO

Ultraviolet

Jan 27, 2020

Leftist Censorship Tactic: #53,931: Label all sources of unflattering, but truthful info. as "hate". Your Fallacy Is:

mattsixteen24

2Jan 27, 2020

I think the bishops and francis do enough hating on the Church. bp barron has an account on gloria.tv

Thors Catholic Hammer

Jan 30, 2020

Where on Gloria.tv is this “bishop” Barron account?

BrotherBeowulf

4Jan 27, 2020

Dear Bishop ("Hell's Empty") Barron: It is you and your fellow effeminate bishops who are "often deeply at odds with the theology of the Church."
Because you do not preach Christ but rather yourself, dear Bishop (Who Am I To Judge) Barron, of the house of Mccarrick & Wuerl, it is not you who are "having a powerful impact on the people of God."More

Dear Bishop ("Hell's Empty") Barron: It is you and your fellow effeminate bishops who are "often deeply at odds with the theology of the Church."

Because you do not preach Christ but rather yourself, dear Bishop (Who Am I To Judge) Barron, of the house of Mccarrick & Wuerl, it is not you who are "having a powerful impact on the people of God."