MAY 27, 2017
Dignitatis Humane is not an issue with Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) : English bishops are Cushingites
CATHOLIC HERALD ON RECENT SSPX DEVELOPMENTS
Posted on 26 May 2017 by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf
The editorial at the beginning of this week’s print edition of the Catholic Herald, the UK’s best Catholic weekly.
When Vatican Council II is in agreement with the philosophy and theology of Feeneyism ( invisible cases are not visible and so they are not exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) according to the 16th century magisterium ) then Dignitatis Humanae is not a rupture with the dogma EENS. Then no matter how you interpret Dignitatis Humanae, if Vatican Council II affirms outside the Church there is no salvation, then religious liberty is traditional.1Dignitatis Humane does not contradict the Church's traditional doctrine.2
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf ,like the editorial staff at Catholic Herald the U.K bishops and the Vatican Curia interpret Dignitatis Humane (DH)with the theology of Cushingism. The SSPX does the same. So there is the tension for traditionalist and conservative Catholics with reference to DH.
If they simply switched to Feeneyism as a theology ( invisible baptism of desire cannot be a visible exception to EENS in 2017, the same with LG 16, LG 8 ,UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc)and philosophy( physically invisible cases are not practically visible.Hypothetical cases of someone saved in invincible ignorance is not an objective and verifiable case on earth) then DH is traditional and is not a doctrinal issue.-Lionel Andrades
NO MATTER HOW YOU INTERPRET DIGNITATIS HUMANAE IF VATICAN COUNCIL II AFFIRMS EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS RELIGIOUS LIBERTY IS TRADITIONAL
DIGNITATIS HUMANAE DOES NOT CONTRADICT THE CHURCH'S TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE
FEBRUARY 28, 2014
How does Dignitas Humanae square with the Syllabus of Errors?
MARCH 12, 2016
Traditionalists reviewed Dignitatis Humanae with the theology of irrational Cushingism : so they were wrong at the onseteucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/traditionalists…
NOVEMBER 25, 2014
The Council’s words are strong and forthright here, implicitly asserting the sovereignty of Christ over all nations, but we now seldom hear them quoted
MAY 22, 2014
Franciscans of the Immaculate (FFI) interpret all documents of Vatican Council II with the defacto-dejure, objective-subjective, in fact-in theory distinction
MICHAEL DAVIS MADE A MISTAKE ON THE ISSUE OF VATICAN COUNCIL II AND OTHER RELIGIONS : ALSO ON RELIGIOUS LIBERTY ?
Did Michael Davis know ?
RECONCILIATION OF THE SOCIETY OF ST.PIUS X (SSPX) IS NOW POSSIBLE
LIGHT OF THE WORLD ERROR SHOWS THAT THERE ARE NO REAL DOCTRINAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE VATICAN AND THE SSPX
FOR CARDINAL GODFRIED DANNEELS VATICAN COUNCIL II SAYS THERE IS KNOWN SALVATION OUTSIDE THE CHURCH SO IT IS A BREAK FROM THE PAST