Announcement

Sounds like you've done some extensive research on perverted pagan sexual practices. @F M Shyanguya Or is this all just first-hand experience of yours from the fascinating African culture you grew up in? I personally can't say... I don't share your interest in the former and (thank God) I wasn't raised on a continent with the highest number of HIV/AIDS cases on the planet.

No, I haven't been "made effeminate" either by you nor anyone else. Interestingly, this particular accusation always comes from the stupidest and most filthy-minded on GTV. It's a rule all effective writers follow: "Write about what you know best." ;-) Absent anything else, reverting to type is the best they can do.

...and then you all cry out with tears in your eyes, your voices breaking in grief, about bullying and harassment and insulting language. Oh noes... UV was mean and poked fun at us!

Boo-hoo! We'z been cyber-bullied! Yeah, no. You throw it but you can't take it. any more than, in your case, you can take the truth.

Well, thanks to the Announcement, it seems I don't have to take it either.

In the past, this sort of nastiness is exactly why I've returned such "courtesy" with scathing, yet profanity-free mockery. Protip: "butthurt" is a common online idiom for the sort of sour attitude that you possess.

Judging by your stilted English, this isn't your first language so I should, charitably, make some allowances for your illiteracy and, just as likely, a sub-standard third-world education. Those allowances , however, are going to be few indeed given of your obvious grudge. Since I'm -not- a moderator here, I -can- caution you to re-read point 1.) about "random insults"

Have you noticed how carefully worded my replies are now? How I'm avoiding my usual venom? How I'm abstaining from the clever puns and nicknames? Point 1.) is the reason for it. Baptist John already unexpectedly ran afoul of that, much to my delight.

It would such a shame if you ultimately got banned from GTV as well with your abuse of me as the cause. Poetic justice, I'd say.

Still, out of charity, I'm going to pretend you didn't read the Announcement as closely as you should have. Perhaps you needed someone fluent in English to explain its full meaning to you. That's just happened.

If you seek to continue some kind of weird, creepy innuendo-based slander campaign against me, rest assured, I will seek your removal from this site with no hesitation at all.

The ironic part is what you're doing is straight out of every high school clique of "Gossip Girls". That's as "effeminate" as you could possibly get short of writing your comments in a camp style with an affected literary lisp.

I've told you this before... people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, eh?

You'd better take a long moment and weigh your love for preaching your bizarre conspiracies on GTV against your admittedly impressive loathing for me. ;-)

Time for some F M Shyanguya Fact Checking. Just what I wanted to do first thing on GTV, eh?

First, I'm not a moderator on GTV. Moderators have the power to suspend and ban users. I do not.

Second, I am not @Holy Cannoli Holy Cannoli doesn't like me anymore. Ironically enough, I still like Holy Cannoli. I'm not Uncle Joe or Anthony Principe. If that's Gesu's blog, then Gesu bears false witness both against me and Holy Cannoli and Uncle Joe and Anthony Principe. Whoever's blog, it's worthy of Gesu's level of factual error, his bias, and his entire "bad for thee but not for me" outlook.

Mr. Principe is correct when he refers to GTV having "a small group of obsessive compulsive, weak intellects, tortilla flipping, half-wits." This is not a reflection of all Latin American Catholics or even al Latin American Catholics on GTV. Just a small group of them, roughly four or five to be exact, Gesu certainly among them.

While I can't speak for Mr. Principe I can say my own comments apply strictly to that latter group.

Gesu and the other four or five "Latin Regulars" always choose to forget and never mention their own "cyberbullying", harassment and abuse while complaining about receiving what they choose to dish out.

The clever bully always cries out in pain when striking others. ;-)

They choose an authentic Latin dinner for me, they pile on the Latin "spices", throw in cupfuls of Cayenne, handfuls of Habenero . It's cooked in a Latin cocina.

I eat that meal without complaint. But then I serve them the same meal, straight from their kitchen.

When they're forced to eat their own food, they complain it's too "caliente".and it burns the mouth. Too bad. You get what you give. You served it to me , now you eat it.

Even then, let's discuss "cyberbullying" and harassment in terms of Latin users "liking" every post I make in an evening with a red hate frown just out of spite.

I don't do that. They do and then they complain how they are victims of an organized campaign of harassment. Harassment looks like the photo attached below. Strangely I don't see you @F M Shyanguya complaining about such behavior.

Funny how that doesn't attract your ire? It isn't "funny' at all. Just a reflection of your two-faced lack of character.

Third, posting under your own name invites online searches, @F M Shyanguya . In your case, people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones at the moral failures of others. Especially with what's been going on in your "house" and at least in one sordid hotel room. You forfeited the right to complain about morals a long time ago.. That is neither an insult nor untrue. It is a demonstrable fact.

"but having experienced her doxxing with impunity that was met with inaction"

...that's because I didn't "doxx" you. All I did was link up some publicly available court records for your sex-sting bust, the appeal your lawyer succeeded in getting it overturned on a ludicrous technicality and the domestic violence charge (sadly dropped thanks to your loving wife's urging). All are accessible just by running your name in a few search engines.

That isn't "doxxing" and THAT, my dear FM, is why your bawwing to Don Reto "was met with inaction". He understands what "doxxing" is and didn't allow you mislead him with your exaggerations.

So you're embarrassed by a friendly public reminder of your own rampant hypocrisy. Obviously the knowledge sits very badly with you as well it should. You're good at pointing fingers, FM, but you don't like looking in the mirror.

Fourth, you assume my gender is female. I have never stated my gender on GTV one way or the other. The fact you naturally assume it's female for a user whom you dislike points to some obvious misogyny on your part. Your treatment of your wife underscores this.

Fifth, Gesu's (assuming it's Gesu's) argument about ad hominem fallacies displays either his ignorance or his willingness to lie. An "ad hominem" fallacy is a personal attack -instead of- a factual rebuttal. My insults and mockery are included WITH a factual rebuttal. There's the difference. Also, as always, the blogger forgets people who can't take a punch shouldn't start throwing them.

I take the hits against myself, my faith, my beliefs. Lies are repeated for the sake spreading them "U Like Francis" being the most popular lie. I take all of that without complaint. If I'm snide, flippant and catty by way of reply, then little wonder.

Sixth, using the term "manure" and consuming it are two different things. The closest I ever come to coprophagia is reading your comments and posts @F M Shyanguya :D

Show where the "Petrine munus" appears anywhere in Canon Law 332.2 @ @Fiel al Evangelio ...and that goes double for you too, @Jimmy from Ohio We've already had the "heretic" discussion. Your rhetorical question is wrong, you've been told why already under you Zecchariah account. You're a repeatedly banned user. I know it's you, you know it's you. Go away, man. Go away or you'll be made to go away. The admin is tired of people like you. Find another Catholic board that hasn't already banned you.. GTV is not for you. It never was, it definitely isn't now.

@Rafal_Ovile "There can not be simultaneously more than one valid pope in the Catholic Church." There aren't two popes now. Benedict XVI resigned, said he resigned repeatedly. and acknowledged Francis as his successor. Also repeatedly. Therefore so-called "debate" is like so much belief-based "debate". It's neither logical nor legitimate. A Catholic can argue facts, scritpure, and science against an abortion supporter, defeat every point they raise and STILL not convince them because the abortion supporter -believes- in abortion. No amount of fact will ever counter that belief and the same is true for those who WANT to believe Benedict did not resign. Nothing will convince them to the contrary because belief is not always based on reason.

It is an axiom that against a fact there is no argument (“contra factum non est argumentum”, St. Thomas Aquinas). You cannot argue against a fact. Bergoglio was already a Marxist in Argentina. Bergoglio already supported gay unions in Argentina.
Bergoglio had already given his name to Freemasonry, etc, etc, which show that Bergoglio was not qualified to be pope because he did not profess the Catholic faith.
Bergoglio is like an unfaithful man who appears to be married but who planned to remain unfaithful.

An unrepentant heretic A traitor who planned to perpetuate his treachery. The mistake of the Bergoglians is that they start from a lie. They accepted a heretic as their pope. They refuse to see the evidence and cover their ears when the same members of the Mafia of San Galo publicly affirm that Bergoglio was chosen by them.

But the truth is that you cannot argue against the fools and the blind. Bergoglians, you are free to cover your ears so as not to hear the Truth. BYE

In Bergoglio the mystery about the false Prophet is fulfilled: "The Beast that was, and is not". From the beginning Bergoglio called himself the 'bishop of Rome', he did not call himself Pope and then he renounced being the 'vicar of Christ'. And it is known that there was never an apostolic succession because Pope Benedict XVI did not renounce the Petrine munus. So Bergoglio is an anti Pope who also acts as the false prophet; who is the vicar of the antichrist.
Bergoglio invented his own neo-papacy, Bergoglio is the pope of the anti-church.

Tough, but necessary call by GTV. Just think about the division' that has emanated from the whole argument of whether Francis is the "True Pope or not." A pointless argument, given that the majority of the Church accepts him as the legitimate occupier of the "Seat of Peter" and for all attempts and purposes, so does the rest of the world. As a Traditional Catholic, I have no issue with the new compliance required by GTV, Whether Pope Francis is performing his required duties, as deemed by The magisterium of the Catholic Church, is another question all together and legitimately open to question.

Hermanos católicos hispanos este mensaje es del moderador de Gloria TV contra nosotros los católicos hispanos, discriminando contra los hermanos mexicanos tratandonos como "Taco Men". "tortilla flipping "volteadores de Tortilla":
Anthony Principe: “Incluso aquí en la pequeña Gloria tenemos un pequeño grupo de obsesivos compulsivos, intelectos débiles, volteretas de tortillas, imbéciles que esparcen su veneno a diario, no solo en su propio idioma, sino que su enfermedad mental es tan abrumadora que
también sintieron la necesidad de difundir su bilis en el tablero inglés (ver mi foto de perfil). Estos miserables enanos intelectuales son en realidad su peor castigo. Sin darse cuenta de que su comportamiento es infantil, repetitivo y obsesivo, están destinados a continuar, afirmando su locura a todos los que tropiezan con su basura “.