Gloria.tv And Coronavirus: Huge Amount Of Traffic, Standstill in Donations
Clicks5K
en.news
114

Bishop Concedes: Francis Is Perhaps Pope - But of "Some Other Cult"

“Francis, the Merciful” is perhaps “a valid pope for some other Church or cult," retired Corpus Christi Bishop René Gracida, 96, writes on Abyssum.org (February 25).

However, "Francis is not now nor has he ever been a pope of the Roman Catholic Church.”

Gracida stated several times before, that Francis is an "antipope." Probably for age reasons, he was so far neither censored nor punished.

The bishop writes that his "intuition (perhaps guided by the Holy Spirit) told me that Jorge Bergoglio is not truly the pope" from the moment he walked out onto the balcony of Saint Peter's , "improperly dressed" and "flanked by two men who I had reason to believe were homosexuals."

Ludovic Denim
The Pope is Benedict XVI as we know from the Great Schism of the west that there can't be 3 Popes at the same time. The two others were judged later antipope and that is what will happen for Bergoglio too as Benedict XVI remains Pope and was forced to announce a false resignation due to the Bank of Italy that blocked all the ATMs from the Vatican as soon as the 1st January 2013 until the day …More
The Pope is Benedict XVI as we know from the Great Schism of the west that there can't be 3 Popes at the same time. The two others were judged later antipope and that is what will happen for Bergoglio too as Benedict XVI remains Pope and was forced to announce a false resignation due to the Bank of Italy that blocked all the ATMs from the Vatican as soon as the 1st January 2013 until the day after he announced his so-called resignation the Day of Our Lady of Lourdes and the former agreement of the Lateran Treaty.
Thors Catholic Hammer
Bishop Gracida and other bishops have been flagging the antipapacy of Bergoglio for some time now.
All the mainstream media, who love the pro homosexual antipope, of course ignore critcism of their poster boy.
iwirawan
Yes. I is a Pachamama cult. They worship "Mother Earth" and Soros.
Angie W.
Bergoglio has two heretical documents that prove that he is a heretic: Amoris Laetitia and Querida Amazonia
The dogma of the Papacy affirms that the Magisterium of a pope cannot teach heresy in matters of faith and morals.
The Apostolic Exhortation are documents that belong to the Magisterium of the Church. Presenting this two heretical documents as ' Apostolic exhortations' Bergoglio declares …More
Bergoglio has two heretical documents that prove that he is a heretic: Amoris Laetitia and Querida Amazonia
The dogma of the Papacy affirms that the Magisterium of a pope cannot teach heresy in matters of faith and morals.
The Apostolic Exhortation are documents that belong to the Magisterium of the Church. Presenting this two heretical documents as ' Apostolic exhortations' Bergoglio declares himself as a heretic.
Angie W.
Who stubbornly continues to claim that Bergoglio is a pope is a heretic because he then denies the dogma of papal infallibility. St. Robert Bellarmine: "A manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and others."
Rafał_Ovile
Angie W. The clue is in clear interpreatation of pope Benedict XVI's documents. What followed is only accidental. That is of secondary relevance for Church to recognize which of two living men being only one true pope, or heretical etc.
hitherto
God bless you Bishop Gracida. You get us, "all fire up" here in Texas!
Ultraviolet
Intuition is a poor guide for determining facts, entirely too easy to be "(perhaps guided by other not-so-holy spirits)". If Bishop Gracida applied Canon Law and Church Magisterium, then he'd have to condemn the last four Popes as well.

There have been several modernist Popes before Francis. They just haven't been as blatant.
Thors Catholic Hammer
@Ultraviolet

The facts are you have declared all popes since Vat 2 to be formal heretics.
A pope can not be a formal heretic and remain or be a pope.
That means you are either a sedevacantist and pretend not to be or you are fool utterly ignorant of catholic doctrine concerning the normal protections given to popes by the Holy Spirit to prevent them from making serious errors.on doctrine.
I doub…More
@Ultraviolet

The facts are you have declared all popes since Vat 2 to be formal heretics.
A pope can not be a formal heretic and remain or be a pope.
That means you are either a sedevacantist and pretend not to be or you are fool utterly ignorant of catholic doctrine concerning the normal protections given to popes by the Holy Spirit to prevent them from making serious errors.on doctrine.
I doubt you even know what the word doctrines means.
Ultraviolet
"The facts are you have declared all popes since Vat 2 to be formal heretics."

Liar. I have never declared any such thing. You're making things up again, Thor. Just like you always do every day. The only way you can prove your claim is by quoting me directly. Link the quote, you fraud. Put up or shut up.

"A pope can not be a formal heretic and remain or be a pope."

As I have said many times…More
"The facts are you have declared all popes since Vat 2 to be formal heretics."

Liar. I have never declared any such thing. You're making things up again, Thor. Just like you always do every day. The only way you can prove your claim is by quoting me directly. Link the quote, you fraud. Put up or shut up.

"A pope can not be a formal heretic and remain or be a pope."

As I have said many times before, by your reasoning, the one I'm quoting right now, then John Paul II is guilty as well. He approved the document "Dominus Jesus" and others have found it to be heretical as well.

www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php

"That means you are either a sedevacantist and pretend not to be or you are fool utterly ignorant of catholic doctrine...

Fallacy of the false dilemma, Thor. :D Bold rhetoric, fallacious reasoning. Typical of you.

I'm none of those things. I'm the guy who shows you up for what you truly are: a liar, a fraud, a paranoid disease-obsessed neurotic, and a hypocrite who uses one standard for judging Pope Francis and then abandons it for his predecessors.

Above all, I make a point of demonstrating you are a joke, a human parrot repeating the same garbage literally every day , often word-for-word one post after another.

Now then. Let's see you prove your claim. Or are you just going to walk away from your verbal dung like you normally do and repeat the same filth tomorrow?
Thors Catholic Hammer
Bishop Gracida is 100% correct concerning the non existence of the francis “papacy “.
GChevalier
In fact, the Antichrist is the pope of the Masonic cult, in other words, the first Mason on the planet, and his triangular brothers know it well as they also know that his 5 predecessors are theirs.
Rafał_Ovile
Rafał_Ovile shares this.
"Francis is not now nor has he ever been a pope of the Roman Catholic Church.”
Prayhard
Bergie is very likely a bender too. Pray for BP Gracida.