July 26, 2019 (Steven O’Reilly) – When is a “pope” not a pope? A recent commentary by Cardinal Müller seems to suggest, albeit in an oblique manner, how we might know. …
Sin embargo no siendo infalible se atreve a decir que el tienen un poder por encima del Espiritu Santo para cambiar el Papado siguiendo sugerencias humanas: “Debo pensar en una conversión del papado. Me corresponde, como Obispo de Roma, estar abierto a las sugerencias que se orienten a un ejercicio de mi ministerio que lo vuelva más fiel al sentido que Jesucristo quiso darle”
Bergoglio dijo la Verdad ya que ciertamente no esta asistido por el Espiritu Santo porque no es Papa pero la dijo con la segunda intención de atacar el dogma de la Infalibilidad Papal de los Papas auténticos.
--"If we assume hypothetically that Pope Francis were to make such an ex cathedra declaration on the subject above.." A hypothetical assumption based on WHAT criteria, please? This is Pope Francis, undisputed master of vagueness and ambiguity. When does he EVER spek ex cathedra on controversial topics? This is precisely what everyone (particularly his enemies) WANT him to do and he, sly fox that …More
--"If we assume hypothetically that Pope Francis were to make such an ex cathedra declaration on the subject above.." A hypothetical assumption based on WHAT criteria, please? This is Pope Francis, undisputed master of vagueness and ambiguity. When does he EVER spek ex cathedra on controversial topics? This is precisely what everyone (particularly his enemies) WANT him to do and he, sly fox that he is, carefully avoids.
One more comment from San Atanasio ora pro nobis