Clicks779

An amazing rainbow appeared over Lourdes on The Feast of The Annunciation!

malemp
This video was filmed by the priest in charge of the Basilica of Lourdes the day 25° is significant for the Lourdes apparitions just search and you find was a true sign of heaven not only a rainbow
Pattfm
@Ultraviolet turn your computer upside down and comment.
Ultraviolet
Go practice your English on a different venue, @Pattfm. You don't know what you're talking about. Maybe that's a fantastic put-down in Nigerian, but it doesn't translate well at all.
Pattfm
I am sorry for your lack of understanding.
Ultraviolet
Personally, I'm sorry GTV doesn't have moderators. You'd be history by now.
Ultraviolet
The rainbow is beautiful reminder of God's covenant with man and... it has absolutely NOTHING to do with @KristianKeller's irrelevant spam.
KristianKeller
The only thing irrelevant is your opinion on link I shared under video-footage from Lourdes. Website contains truth which you oppose and hate from bottom of your heart. (So, your opinion is irrelevant, and people should see it regardless of what you say. I believe that God wants them to see that link. It will open eyes of many people.)
Ultraviolet
I hate hypocrisy and double-standards such as yours. Why? Because truth is based on consistency and that is what you lack. The truth is you are either a sedevacantist and therefore a schismatic or you are hypocrite with the same double-standards favored by that other spamming hypocrite Crackers The Parrot.

"I believe that God wants them to see that link. It will open eyes of many people."

More
I hate hypocrisy and double-standards such as yours. Why? Because truth is based on consistency and that is what you lack. The truth is you are either a sedevacantist and therefore a schismatic or you are hypocrite with the same double-standards favored by that other spamming hypocrite Crackers The Parrot.

"I believe that God wants them to see that link. It will open eyes of many people."

That's nice. Good for you. So why don't you start your OWN post for it?

We both know why you don't: nobody cares about your garbage and you know it as well as I do.

The only way you can get any attention is by spamming on interesting posts other people make. Essentially, you're a parasite, a leech on the hard work of others.

There's the truth which you oppose, the truth you hide from, you sanctimonius charlatan.
KristianKeller
You are a truly minister of Lucifer! (here is a proof of Francis' apostasy)
KristianKeller
And another one proof that what is being deployed in Rome is antichurch, not true Church of Christ.
2 more comments from KristianKeller
KristianKeller
What is being said on vaticancatholic.com is truth, and sedevacantist position is true position. You already have seen the facts and you obstinently hate the truth. This public space does not belong to you only. You would seriously be useful for Satanic regime of China (useful for them). You are a fraud! You are a despicable liar, and blasphemer that promotes A) Parallelism of Egyptian myths …More
What is being said on vaticancatholic.com is truth, and sedevacantist position is true position. You already have seen the facts and you obstinently hate the truth. This public space does not belong to you only. You would seriously be useful for Satanic regime of China (useful for them). You are a fraud! You are a despicable liar, and blasphemer that promotes A) Parallelism of Egyptian myths with divine Scripture and B) sais that it describes the same as Jesus's Life, death and resurrection. Just in case people might not know what I am talking about, the debate(s) we have had is/are here:
Pope Francis’ Homily at Extraordinary ‘Urbi et Orbi’ Blessing
Frozen (2) , people should avoid!

Plus you accused me of having "adult content" on my drive without evidence and you promote Boticeli's Venus you sick pervert.

You are on the road to hell you heretic.
KristianKeller
You are a sick pervert! You are a hypocrite, for you accuse me without evidence to have "adult content" on hard drive, while you openly praise naked art. You idolatrous evil man. God hates you and despises you and rejects you. It was for people like you that Hell needs to be, that it was created. You had to be rebuked, for you are a liar and enemy of truth, and you have to be opposed, you little …More
You are a sick pervert! You are a hypocrite, for you accuse me without evidence to have "adult content" on hard drive, while you openly praise naked art. You idolatrous evil man. God hates you and despises you and rejects you. It was for people like you that Hell needs to be, that it was created. You had to be rebuked, for you are a liar and enemy of truth, and you have to be opposed, you little punk! You won't call me a parasite.
Ultraviolet
"...and sedevacantist position is true position."

Well! At least now you're admitting you're a sedevacantist. That's making progress.

Unfortunately for you, a sedevacantist is also a schismatic.
canonlawmadeeasy.com/…/can-you-be-both…

It's also, arguably, heresy.

www.unamsanctamcatholicam.com/apologetics/contra-sedevaca…

So sorry, no, your position isn't truth.

"You already have …More
"...and sedevacantist position is true position."

Well! At least now you're admitting you're a sedevacantist. That's making progress.

Unfortunately for you, a sedevacantist is also a schismatic.
canonlawmadeeasy.com/…/can-you-be-both…

It's also, arguably, heresy.

www.unamsanctamcatholicam.com/apologetics/contra-sedevaca…

So sorry, no, your position isn't truth.

"You already have seen the facts and you obstinently hate the truth."

A position that argues away from unity with The Church is not a true one. Ergo, either your facts or your reasoning or your conclusions derived are false.

"for you accuse me without evidence to have "adult content" on hard drive"

If memory serves, and again you're referencing discussions from long ago absent links, it was a speculation. Very likely a true one, too. Again, a speculation. Not sure which "naked art" you're ranting about, either. You love dragging up discussion points from ages ago, no links, just out of the blue as if that's what we're talking about here.

As for nated art, Michelangelo's "David" was originally intended to be installed on a cathedral. There's also some "naked art" in the Sistine Chapel. It was commissioned by a Pope no less, you moron.

www.througheternity.com/…/nudity-and-cont…

www.artstor.org/…/michelangelos-l…

All you do is throw empty claims, "liar," "enemy of the truth", "rebuke", so why are YOU always the one being proven wrong??? Ever think about that? You're just noise.

...and a parasite. You post your material inside other people's posts to steal their audience. You know it, I know it. If your "facts" were even slightly worthwhile, you'd start your own posts and not inject them in other people's.

KristianKeller you are a Cuckoo, Oh, not just in the sense of being crazy and delusional. But I mean in the biological sense. The Cuckoo is a parasite that does what you do.

It lays its egg in the nest of another bird, and when it hatches, the baby bird kills the other little birds who belong there so the Cuckoo can be fed alone.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckoo

That's exactly what you're doing here, very deliberately. Your "facts" don't belong here. They aren't "relevant" here because here the subject is a beautiful rainbow over Lourdes.

Just like the Muslim who hijacks a plane to go somewhere else, you hijack other people's posts to go where YOU want them to.
KristianKeller
You said, I am sure there will be something on hard-drive, so you even lie about that.

Than you say I am a Cuckoo a parasite by means of a characteristic of that bird. Soon you will deny that if you come to harass me in comments later on. Get a life. Plus you are not speaking for majority, and you are not speaking for admins, blogger of this post, ect.. In fact non of them you represent. You …More
You said, I am sure there will be something on hard-drive, so you even lie about that.

Than you say I am a Cuckoo a parasite by means of a characteristic of that bird. Soon you will deny that if you come to harass me in comments later on. Get a life. Plus you are not speaking for majority, and you are not speaking for admins, blogger of this post, ect.. In fact non of them you represent. You are delusional and you represent only yourself. Did you know that naked art was not displayed before Vatican II council? Do you know that Church condemns naked art? Of course I don't want answer now, but you should maybe study it you puffed up peacock (this parallel of the bird which I just mentioned matches you).

I mean, it's pointless to even talk with such filthy liar like you. You are an abomination. I think enough was already said. You are blocked, and I will ignore you.

It is not heresy to be sedevacantist, neither schizm, you have no idea what you are talking about. It was proven that those that are outside of Church are antipope Francis and antipope Benedict XVI who resigned, and people that joined them. They profess false faith.

Galatians 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema.

Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (#15), June 29, 1896: “No one, therefore, unless in communion with Peter can share in his authority, since it is absurd to imagine that he who is outside can command in the Church.”

St. Robert Bellarmine, Cardinal and Doctor of the Church, De Romano Pontifice, II, 30: "A pope who is a manifest heretic automatically (per se) ceases to be pope and head, just as he ceases automatically to be a Christian and a member of the Church. Wherefore, he can be judged and punished by the Church. This is the teaching of all the ancient Fathers who teach that manifest heretics immediately lose all jurisdiction."

Read more here: www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/6_noheretic_pope.pdf
(My comments are public also for others to read.)
Ultraviolet
"You said, I am sure there will be something on hard-drive, so you even lie about that."

I also just said, "If memory serves," because I'm referencing a discussion entirely from memory since you insist on re-arguing it weeks? months? after the fact. Without linking the discusson up. This is the second time I've caught you doing this so I'm guessing there's some weird argumentative reason.

More
"You said, I am sure there will be something on hard-drive, so you even lie about that."

I also just said, "If memory serves," because I'm referencing a discussion entirely from memory since you insist on re-arguing it weeks? months? after the fact. Without linking the discusson up. This is the second time I've caught you doing this so I'm guessing there's some weird argumentative reason.

You're hiding behind the past, KristianKeller Linking my comments directly has a way of blowing up in your face. :D

"Than you say I am a Cuckoo a parasite by means of a characteristic of that bird."

Your actions here is proof of it.

"Soon you will deny that if you come to harass me in comments later on."

Since I don't refer to discussions weeks in the past without linking to them, that accusation is false. Invariably, I address the subject being discussed. You are the one who tries to re-argue a debate you already lost weeks ago. :D

I don't have to re-fight a battle I won. You come back for these "re-matches" trying to undo the past.

Now then... let us continue discussing what you are doing here.

Whether or not I speak for the majority, or the minority, or the persons whose post this rightfully is or my own sweet self doesn't change what you are doing.

What you are doing is wrong.

Yes, I do represent only myself. I never claimed otherwise. If I'm the only one who calls you out for being a filthy little thief who kidnaps the audience on somone else's post., the claim is still true.

You're one of those truly amoral "pretend-Christians" who seems to believe stealing is right if nobody catches you. Or only one person complains about you stealing.

Stealing is wrong if ten people complain and it stays wrong if only one person complains. If nobody complains and you didn't get caught, you're still a thief..

You hijacked this post to raise your information. The Cuckoo Bird hijacks other birds nest to raise its own chick.

You know what you are doing and I know what you are doing. If other people complain or do not complain that does not CHANGE what you are doing. You are a parasite, nothing more nothing less, nothing else.

"Did you know that naked art was not displayed before Vatican II council?"

Somebody doesn't know about Donatello's David anymore than Michelangelo's. Idiot. As stupid as you are dishonest.

"you puffed up peacock (this parallel of the bird which I just mentioned matches you)."

Oh yes, I've never denied that. :D I am a peacock. I'm proud because I'm skilled at beating people like you on your own terms, making you look foolish, and exposing you for the charlatans you truly are.

Maybe when you can -show- I'm a "liar", you'll have a reason to call me one.

"You are blocked, and I will ignore you."

Sure you will. Until the next time. All "blocking" me does is keep me from commenting on YOUR posts on YOUR comments. Have you noticed something? I'm still replying. How is that possible?

Because this is not YOUR comment. This is not YOUR post.

You don't make too many of your own posts, do you? Nobody cares about your posts.

This is why you are here.

This is why you need to hijack THIS post into YOUR post.

"It was proven that those that are outside of Church are antipope Francis and antipope Benedict XVI who resigned, and people that joined them. They profess false faith."

"proven"?? Cool story, bro. You haven't "proven" anything. Links? Citations? Canon Law? You? Never.

All you have is the same thing everyone else has when they start screaming about "antipopes"... nothing. You have nothing except your own dumb mouth and the sewage that spills out of it.

"Galatians 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema."

Too bad neither Francis nor Benedict XVI have introduced a new gospel, you moron.

Likewise, you haven't shown any lack of "communion" with the Church. The only one who isn't in communion is you. It is not for you to decide which Popes are lawful or not any more than it is for you to decide which Church teachings are lawful or not. You're making the same mistake Martin Luther did.

...and look what comes of it. You have no moral center, right and wrong are whatever YOU think they are. This explains why you see nothing wrong with hijacking other people's posts to push your information.

You would not like that if someone did that to you. So much for "do unto others..." You try to lecture me about schism and sedevacantism when you casually ignore even the most basic teachings of Christ Himself.

""A pope who is a manifest heretic automatically (per se) ceases to be pope and head,"

...and for that we need a carefully made judgement by a recognized Church authority. And you're still wrong. Like so:

novusordowatch.org/…/burke-francis-n…

Most importantly, NONE of this has ANYTHING to do with a beautiful rainbow over Lourdes. This is the subject of this post. Not Pope Francis, not "Read more here:".

It's real simple, KristianKeller. This is not your post so you don't decide the topic. If you want to talk about something else, start your own post for it.

You are trying to steal an audience because you can't get one with a post of your own. Stealing is wrong. Hijacking posts is wrong. You are wrong and nothing you have said changes any of that. Not the nasty videos in your computer, not what St. Robert Bellarmine wrote, not quotes from Galatians.

Stealing is wrong and that doesn't change based on how many people complain.

And "blocking" me isn't going to stop me from pointing that out every time I catch you doing it.

All of this is a deflection from you.

You are hijacking someone else's post and trying to steal their audience. Stealing is wrong. Go start your own post for your own topic.
KristianKeller
See following documentary, that explains what is going on in Rome: www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/…/apocalypse-now-…