Even with all the devastation wrought by Vatican II, it makes a difference who the Pope is. A Pope can give us Vatican II Modernism on steroids (hint), OR.....like Pope Benedict XVI....slowly turn the ship around without causing another rupture.

Under Pope Benedict we had a great stabilization taking place in the Church, and Tradition was given its rightful place in the heart of the Church once again with Summorum Pontificum, which in itself was a great reparation to Almighty God and drew down upon the Church many blessings.

In addition, for example, Pope Benedict insisted on the highly significant corrections to some essential texts of the Mass, such as the Consecration (For you and for many...not "all") and the "Lord I am not worthy" before Holy Communion which had been completely changed in a humanistic manner from its scriptural origins.

There was a resurgence of vocations and many young men were encouraged by Pope Benedict's orthodoxy and stabilizing influence to enter the Priesthood. We all experienced renewed hope that perhaps all the insanity of Vatican II would be more fully mitigated.

Pope Benedict's Papacy was certainly not free from the influence of Modernism or the deeply entrenched moral and spiritual corruption in Rome; but his solicitude for the restoration of the Liturgy was clear, and as this touches upon the very worship of God Himself, it constitutes an absolutely essential element of restorative justice.

What a surprise. All you have to do is go down the alphabetical list, A-Z of Archdioceses and dioceses and nothing but decline every years since Vatican II closed in 1965, accelerated by evil Popes like Paul VI and especially Francis. The late, great Cardinal Giuseppe Siri once said, that it will that the Roman Catholic Church 200 years to recover from the disaster of Vatican II. We're already past almost 60.