SML2

Pope named as defendant in Australian legal claim

Published: 30 November 2020 Pope Francis has been named as a defendant in a Victorian Supreme Court damages claim by three Aboriginal men who say …
Ultraviolet
Another "abuse survivor" payout scam. Brought to you by the same country that wrongly convicted Cardinal Pell. Let's take a quick look at everything wrong with these savages' claims.

Drug addiction, homelessness and unemployment are endemic among abos. These three will have to show that their drug addiction, homelessness, and unemployment somehow directly resulted from abuse, and only abuse …More
Another "abuse survivor" payout scam. Brought to you by the same country that wrongly convicted Cardinal Pell. Let's take a quick look at everything wrong with these savages' claims.

Drug addiction, homelessness and unemployment are endemic among abos. These three will have to show that their drug addiction, homelessness, and unemployment somehow directly resulted from abuse, and only abuse at the hands of a Catholic priest. As opposed to drug addiction, homelessness, and unemployment resulting from being substance abusing, shiftless, lazy abos.

Since there's almost certainly no evidence these three were abused by a Catholic priest, the only evidence here is the claims of drug addicted, homeless, unemployed abos.

Unless their childhood occurred within just the past seven years, then they're sueing the wrong Pope. Personal liability stems only from harm personally caused. Pope C is not personally liable for something that happened when Pope A or B was in office

"They are seeking compensation and exemplary or punitive damages against Pope Francis"

They're seeking money and money and more money. . And then they wonder how all those awful stereotypes against aborigines get started.