If "for many" is correct then for all is a lie.

Sadly there is more than what meets the eye as these are very precise words used by Our Lord for the institution of the Holy Eucharist. Our Lord’s blood was shed for those Jews (you) and many of the …
Dr Bobus
The point is that pro multis is not precise. It includes both that Christ died for all, but that only a few (ὀλίγοι) may be saved.
Dr Bobus
I hesitate critiquing Fr Meuli, who I understand was a very good priest and a promoter of Latin liturgy.

The Latin Novus Ordo has pro multis. The question only concerns the translations. Of course, in the Vulgate it is pro multis, also in the Greek Septuagint.

He cites the Summa but in the end does not agree with the conclusion of St Thomas, who distinguishes between the Essence and Substance …More
I hesitate critiquing Fr Meuli, who I understand was a very good priest and a promoter of Latin liturgy.

The Latin Novus Ordo has pro multis. The question only concerns the translations. Of course, in the Vulgate it is pro multis, also in the Greek Septuagint.

He cites the Summa but in the end does not agree with the conclusion of St Thomas, who distinguishes between the Essence and Substance of the Sacramental Form. In order for validity the Sac Form must communicate the essence. The Eucharist is unique because there are two consecations, neither of which alone is sufficient to make present the Sacrifice--even though each alone consecrates the host and wine. Thus if valid matter is used for the first consecration but not the second, the host is consecrated but not the wine. And vice versa. Thus, whoever receives the host would receive the Body of Christ even though the Sacrifice would not have been confected--it would not have been a mass.

Each Sacramental Form signifies what the matter will become, but neither is sufficent to signify the Sacramental Sacrifice, which is the combination of both consecrations.
Scapular
JMJ Dear Doctor you are a natural! Simply the most exhaustive commentary I have seen in this episode of Res Sacramenti. This arithmetic was presented to C Ratzinger in 2000! The fight is now on with Pope Francis Reverting to for all!

Would you be interested in The promulgation Of this argument to a wider audience?

Jesu et Maria

Tim Morgan