Ultraviolet
and YOU called an American Catholic, "the Devil's ranting trolls," and "a dog foaming at the mouth... chasing it's (sic) mangy tail" @Baptist John "So are you able to see your hypocritical behavior? And do you have a subversive agenda?"

The irony of you lecturing @Alex A the lecture about his "hypocritical behavior". :P . Protip: the 'Catholics' who get called those "rotten terms" are …More
and YOU called an American Catholic, "the Devil's ranting trolls," and "a dog foaming at the mouth... chasing it's (sic) mangy tail" @Baptist John "So are you able to see your hypocritical behavior? And do you have a subversive agenda?"

The irony of you lecturing @Alex A the lecture about his "hypocritical behavior". :P . Protip: the 'Catholics' who get called those "rotten terms" are frequently not even Catholics. They're anti-Papal schismatics, anti-semites, or in the case of that "Polish Catholic", someone who rarely posts in English except to start arguments with one particular American Catholic. ;-) He deserves what he gets as you do, you simpering sancitimonious two-faced fraud.
Ultraviolet
Do you have a poll showing the numbers of Catholics who started worshippingPachamama as a result of the Amazonian synod? @Baptist John You don't? Then your claim "False Francis led many people to Apostasy...by leading them in worship of that pagan goddess at the Vatican" is facutally baseless. That's a nice way of saying, you're making it up out of thin air without a shred of proof.

You and …More
Do you have a poll showing the numbers of Catholics who started worshippingPachamama as a result of the Amazonian synod? @Baptist John You don't? Then your claim "False Francis led many people to Apostasy...by leading them in worship of that pagan goddess at the Vatican" is facutally baseless. That's a nice way of saying, you're making it up out of thin air without a shred of proof.

You and Gesu share the same moral void. You seem to genuinely believe that if you dislike someone, that gives you the right to lie about them as you please. It doesn't. Not in the Catholic Church it doesn't. Maybe for you Baptists, it does, @Baptist John So go post on a Baptist site and leave a Catholic site to us Catholics. :D
Ultraviolet
Seriously @Gesù è con noi Do you truly think repeatng your lies will stop me from exposing them with the official law of the Catholic Church? Nice to see you're done with the evening's prime-time lewdness and debauchery on "Univision" and you're back on GTV pretending you're "el bueno Catolico" :P
3 more comments from Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet
"Bergoglio defies the Catholic moral doctrine therefore he is in schism..."That isn't "schism" according to the Catholic Church, @Gesù è con noi. Schism "is the refusal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him.

Pope Francis is the Pope. There is only ONE Pope. How can Pope Francis "refuse to submit" to Pope Francis?

Go back to …More
"Bergoglio defies the Catholic moral doctrine therefore he is in schism..."That isn't "schism" according to the Catholic Church, @Gesù è con noi. Schism "is the refusal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him.

Pope Francis is the Pope. There is only ONE Pope. How can Pope Francis "refuse to submit" to Pope Francis?

Go back to your Santeria blasphemies, Go back to your Tijuana tiolette. Come back when you get your facts straight. I've only linked the Canon Law on this enough times already that you're even stealing from my comments, you miserable ladronito.
Ultraviolet
"Jorge Mario Bergoglio AKA Francis "is not in full communion with the Catholic Church." @Gesù è con noi Wrong, estupido. You have not shown Francis denies a truth definitively proposed. At best, Francis is advancing a new error of his own. He is not denying a truth of the Church. Big difference... and MUCH too big to fit in that fat head of yours, already full to the ears with Goya …More
"Jorge Mario Bergoglio AKA Francis "is not in full communion with the Catholic Church." @Gesù è con noi Wrong, estupido. You have not shown Francis denies a truth definitively proposed. At best, Francis is advancing a new error of his own. He is not denying a truth of the Church. Big difference... and MUCH too big to fit in that fat head of yours, already full to the ears with Goya Tropicola.
Ultraviolet
"The Code of Canon Law defines heresy as.." ...and that's where you fail @Gesù è con noi Heresy and error are different. Heresy, as the Church defines it in Canon Law 751, is "an obstinate denial or obstinate doubt after the reception of baptism of some truth which is to be believed by divine and Catholic faith; "

Obstinacy shows a deliberate course of action, i.e. "stubbornly adhering to …More
"The Code of Canon Law defines heresy as.." ...and that's where you fail @Gesù è con noi Heresy and error are different. Heresy, as the Church defines it in Canon Law 751, is "an obstinate denial or obstinate doubt after the reception of baptism of some truth which is to be believed by divine and Catholic faith; "

Obstinacy shows a deliberate course of action, i.e. "stubbornly adhering to an opinion, purpose, or course in spite of reason, arguments, or persuasion."

In this context, the term shows that
a.) the accused heretic has expressed a view

b.) The Church has disgreed with that view as contrary to its teachings.
The Church is not a stupid, Spanish-speaking moron in alifornia.

c.) The Church
has attempted to correct the accused heretic.
The Church 's correction is not a post from a stupid, Spanish-speaking moron in California who's ripping off my posts without proper cittations..

d.)
the accused heretic has opposed that correction by the Church.
The Catholic Church is not you, estupido!


Regarding Pope Francis,
a.) has happened.
b.)-d.) have not happened at all. Therefore, Francis is not a heretic according to the Law of the Catholic Church.

You are not the Catholic Church.
The Catholic Church has not appointed YOU as an official judge. All you are is a liar, and now a plagiarizing thief swiping content from my comments, no less.

...and people wonder why I refuse to speak Spanish. :P

Who has the temporal authority to represent the Church when attempting to correct the supposed errors of the Church's highest temporal authority?

For that matter, who interprets the Church's Magisterium. You don't know. Stealing from MY comments like a two-bit Mexican shop-lifter won't change that.
Gesù è con noi
Bergoglio defies the Catholic moral doctrine therefore he is in schism against all the popes of the Catholic Church.
Gesù è con noi
According to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Jorge Mario Bergoglio AKA Francis "is not in full communion with the Catholic Church."
Gesù è con noi
The Vaticanist from the US conglomerate NCR, Joshua McElwee, stressed that the statement in Afineevsky's documentary "is not news" because he "Bergoglio" "has supported the civil union (for homosexuals) for years."
Gesù è con noi
The Code of Canon Law defines heresy as “the obstinate denial or doubt, after baptism, of a truth which must be believed by divine and catholic faith
Caroline03
"Matteo Salvini already backed down, “I respect the words of the Holy Father."

Salvini was photographed a year ago like this... Implying that he thinks Benedict XVI is POPE.

theguardian.com/…vini-pope-francis-is-the-enemy
Ultraviolet
"He points out that you use the code to defend a heretic, not a pope." No such comment appears on this post anywhere. Another lie from you, Gesu. Only three users have commented on this thread. Gesu. You, me, and ferralex. And Ferralex only linked a news item about satanic masses. Again, you lie and you just got caught in a lie.

"St. Robert Bellarmine: "A manifest heretic is not a Christian…More
"He points out that you use the code to defend a heretic, not a pope." No such comment appears on this post anywhere. Another lie from you, Gesu. Only three users have commented on this thread. Gesu. You, me, and ferralex. And Ferralex only linked a news item about satanic masses. Again, you lie and you just got caught in a lie.

"St. Robert Bellarmine: "A manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and others."

Again, you're not qualified to decide who is or isn't a "manifest heretic". Heresy is a formal charge made by the Catholic Church. Your own statements brand you a schismatic.

Even if you WERE part of the Church, you are not the one who decides which Catholics are heretics.

Just beause YOU say someone is a heretic does not make it an official Church ruling. You're as stupid as our Latin Pope. Go eat some more empanadas and try to keep the crumbs out of your keyboard, moron.
Gesù è con noi
St. Robert Bellarmine: "A manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and others."
Gesù è con noi
Don't waste my time because you have already been corrected by another Catholic user. He points out that you use the code to defend a heretic, not a pope. The Code never mentions a heretic who attacks Catholic doctrine.
Ultraviolet
I am quoting Canon Law verbatim, Gesu. That is the official law of the Catholic Church and YOU are a schismatic according to that law.

"In the Modern Schism Treaty written by Saint Vincent Ferrer ... the heretical idea of Ultraviolet is refuted."

ORLY? You have shown no heresy on my part. You just toss words like "heresy" without any understanding of them, you stupid peasant. Probably an More
I am quoting Canon Law verbatim, Gesu. That is the official law of the Catholic Church and YOU are a schismatic according to that law.

"In the Modern Schism Treaty written by Saint Vincent Ferrer ... the heretical idea of Ultraviolet is refuted."

ORLY? You have shown no heresy on my part. You just toss words like "heresy" without any understanding of them, you stupid peasant. Probably an illegal peasant who doesn't even belong in America.That's based on your writing style.

You're not quoting Saint Ferrer. You're just making a claim about what he wrote. . Like you repeating THIS lie again:

EDIT. You back-edited your post. Just one problem: "If there is schism, there must be schismatics, who are not precisely those who obey the true pope, but those who obey the false as if it were legitimate..."

This quote appears ONLY here, according to Google. Try a linked citation, amigo Maybe V.R.S. can find one on wikipedia for you.

St. Ferrer conflates schism with schismatics. One may have schismatics any time some idiot like you, Gesu, decide to defy the Pope. Schism is something else entirely, i.e. a split within the Church herself.

Again, saints are not infallible. The Church's definition of schism is quite clear and does not entail any shades of meaning. One either submits to the Supreme Pontiff or one does not. There is only one Pope and that's Francis.. We have no pretenders, either. Benedict XVI has repeatedly said he resigned. So... your big quote from Saint Ferrer is as meaningless as your usual Latin-fuelled drivel.

" to promote the heretical, apostate and schism idea that you have to obey a heretic as if he were a valid pope"

First, Pope Francis IS a valid Pope. You do not know how the Magisterium of the Catholic Church is interpreted. I doubt you even know what the Magisterium of the Catholic Church even is, according to the Church's definition! Can you quote it? I asked last night. Nothing from yooooo... :D

Second, I said no such thing about obeying the Pope. You serving Last Night's Lies .-and- they ARE lies. I said just the opposite.

Direct UV Quote::"One may submit to the Supreme Pontiff, nowhere does Canon Law state one must agree with the Supreme Pontiff or follow the Supreme Pontiff when he errs, especially when his errors might well lead him to Hell."

Third, heresy, apostasy, and schism are three different things. Go look them up in dictionary, you stupid, stubby fingered chimchanga chewing, Univision-watching moron.

You're serving Refried Beans and Refried Lies. :P What brand of enchilada sauce are you going to spread all over your stupidity? Whoo! Moar red frownies. Go back to reddit, mongolo. They don't work here.
Gesù è con noi
@Ultraviolet Besides stubborn, deaf and blind? 🤔
In the Modern Schism Treaty written by Saint Vincent Ferrer in a time that for almost forty years the majority of Christians did not know who the legitimate pope was, the heretical idea of Ultraviolet is refuted, who obsessively cites and compulsively repeats: Canon Law 751 defines schism as "the refusal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff..."…More
@Ultraviolet Besides stubborn, deaf and blind? 🤔
In the Modern Schism Treaty written by Saint Vincent Ferrer in a time that for almost forty years the majority of Christians did not know who the legitimate pope was, the heretical idea of Ultraviolet is refuted, who obsessively cites and compulsively repeats: Canon Law 751 defines schism as "the refusal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff..." to promote the heretical, apostate and schism idea that you have to obey a heretic as if he were a valid pope. This document also explained that giving papal honor to a false pope violates the First Commandment and Saint Vincent Ferrer pointed this out as a grave sin of idolatry. In this treaty he wrote: "If there is schism, there must be schismatics, who are not precisely those who obey the true pope, but those who obey the false as if it were legitimate..."
Ultraviolet
Canon Law says no such thing,Gesù. You don't know Canon Law OR how the Magisterium of the Church is decided. You know nothing and it shows.

"Anyone who joins Bergoglio's apostasy separates from the Catholic Church...."

Nonsense... Canon Law is very specific about what you're talking about. Pic related. Enjoy your auto-excommunication. Couldn't happen to a more deserving ex-Catholic..
Alex A
Watch out, Ultraviolet, you will be 'Blocked' as I am, by 'Gesu' for not supporting his shallow point(s) of view. Bear in mind, that he is a member of the modern-day version of the 'Spanish Inquisition' with the backing of the 'prophet' Voris, a source of 'charity' towards his fellow Catholics and the wisdom of an ex-whatever he is a self-proclaimed ex of.
Ultraviolet
@Alex A Congratulations! Now for the big question... which of us got blocked first??? I can't describe how jealous I'll be if you were first! :D It's my competitive streak. Always a fine night when a user displays their obvious fear of your input by "blocking" you. On GTV it's like "tapping out", same kind of admission of defeat. Best of all, it accomplishes nothing except muddying the …More
@Alex A Congratulations! Now for the big question... which of us got blocked first??? I can't describe how jealous I'll be if you were first! :D It's my competitive streak. Always a fine night when a user displays their obvious fear of your input by "blocking" you. On GTV it's like "tapping out", same kind of admission of defeat. Best of all, it accomplishes nothing except muddying the order of the comments and keeping you from shaming them on posts they make. Everywhere else? It's open season and no bag limit. :D

As GTV shows pretty much every day, "blocking" you and "not speaking to you" don't naturally follow.. Just look at our pal @Gesù è con noi He replies all the time, even though he's "blocked" me.

I don't know what you're drinking, but right now I'm popping the tab on an ice-cold Red Bull and hoisting it to the monitor in your honour. Well done, my man. You got blocked. :D
Alex A
@Ultraviolet Cheers! 😊
Gesù è con noi
The Bible curses double language and says it is the work of the evil one Francis, Gay Couples Cannot Form A Family - Abortion Laws Like Nazis Bergoglio also said:“Then today - it hurts to say - we talk about "diversified" families: different types of families. Yes, it is true that the word "family" is an analogical word, because we speak of the "family" of the stars, the "families" of the trees,…More
The Bible curses double language and says it is the work of the evil one Francis, Gay Couples Cannot Form A Family - Abortion Laws Like Nazis Bergoglio also said:“Then today - it hurts to say - we talk about "diversified" families: different types of families. Yes, it is true that the word "family" is an analogical word, because we speak of the "family" of the stars, the "families" of the trees, the "families" of the animals ... it is an analogical word. But the human family as an image of God, man and woman, is only one...
Gesù è con noi
Anyone who joins Bergoglio's apostasy separates from the Catholic Church and joins the antichrist's anti-church.
St. Vincent Ferrer -- Sermon on the Last Judgment: In the same way, in the time of Antichrist, the Sun of justice will be obscured by the interposition of temporal goods and the wealth which Antichrist will bestow on the world, inasmuch as the brightness of faith in Jesus Christ and …More
Anyone who joins Bergoglio's apostasy separates from the Catholic Church and joins the antichrist's anti-church.
St. Vincent Ferrer -- Sermon on the Last Judgment: In the same way, in the time of Antichrist, the Sun of justice will be obscured by the interposition of temporal goods and the wealth which Antichrist will bestow on the world, inasmuch as the brightness of faith in Jesus Christ and the glow of good lives will no longer shine among Christians. For, lest they should lose their dominion, temporal rulers, kings and princes will range themselves on the side of Antichrist. In like manner, prelates for fear of losing their dignities, and religious and priests to gain honors and riches, will forsake the Faith of Christ and adhere to Antichrist.
ferralex
Let's stop the satanic Black Mass together returntoorder.org/…-black-mass-at-official-venue/