Clicks1.2K
en.news
8

Viganò Insists: Conspirators Used Vatican II To Demolish Church

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò responded on MarcoTosatti.com (July 6) to Sandro Magister who claimed that Viganò's criticism of Vatican II is “on the brink of a schism.”

Viganó regrets that he is not talked to but “saddled with epithets” and notices that in the Church the label used to put the adversary in a position of inferiority, unworthy of attention or response, is “Lefebvrian” - while on the socio-political front it is “fascist.”

Viganò re-states that we were all “deceived" by those who used Vatican II as a "container equipped with its own implicit authority” while “distorting its purpose.”

Those deceived didn't imagine - Viganò explains - that at Vatican II a minority of well-organised conspirators used a Council "to demolish the Church from within.”

Viganò says that “intentional ambiguity" in the texts aimed at keeping opposing and irreconcilable visions together, "in the name of an evaluation of utility and to the detriment of revealed Truth.” Thus, he suggests again "to forget" Vatican II en bloc.

He observes that the proponents of Vatican II knew how to practice a damnatio memoriae, not just with one Council but "with everything" to the point of affirming that "their council was the first of the new church," and that beginning with that "the old religion and the old Mass were finished.”

Yet, contradicting interpretations of Vatican II show for Viganò how much damage was done by the deliberate adoption of a language "that was so murky that it legitimised opposing and contrary interpretations, on the basis of which the famous conciliar springtime then occurred.”

#newsWmtnwzlbfy

San Atanasio ora pro nobis
We want Sandro Magister to explain to us, if Vatican II is not dogmatic but pastoral, then why does rejecting the heresies that have been cleverly incorporated into various Vatican II documents make someone who is faithful to the deposit of faith and Tradition schismatic ? In other words, according to Magister Vatican II, that is not dogmatic, it is an untouchable idol that is above the dogmatic …More
We want Sandro Magister to explain to us, if Vatican II is not dogmatic but pastoral, then why does rejecting the heresies that have been cleverly incorporated into various Vatican II documents make someone who is faithful to the deposit of faith and Tradition schismatic ? In other words, according to Magister Vatican II, that is not dogmatic, it is an untouchable idol that is above the dogmatic teachings of the Church. Schismatics are those who do not adhere to dogmatic councils like Trent to which every Catholic is obliged to obey and to give his total assent to the will to the dogmatic teachings of the Church. A "pastoral" council cannot contradict a dogmatic council. The Infallible Magisterium of the Church teaches that the documents of heretics opposed to the teachings of the Church are invalid and null.
Eva
Chesterton: You do not know a tyranny until it is on top of you; until it has you in a trap. The tyrant is not present until he is omnipresent.
Eva
“I have no desire to separate myself from Mother Church, for the exaltation of which I daily renew the offering of my life,” stated Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò
Be Ye Separate
Bishop Marcel Lefebvre's publication, "An Open Letter To Confused Catholics," is very important, informative about the troubles of the V2 revolt.
.
Life Is By, The Precious Blood Of Jesus.
Jmy1975
God help us.
Jaymez
"Those deceived didn't imagine - Viganò explains - that at Vatican II a minority of well-organised conspirators used a Council "to demolish the Church from within.”.."

Anyone who denies the reality of this statement after the results of the last 58 years is either ignorant or deceived....but "Catholic" they are not.