So many times on the comment section of the Remnant website Chris Ferrara would not begin a dialogue when I would comment on some of his good reports.
Basically what I have been saying is that invisible cases of the baptism of desire cannot be visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the need for all to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell and to go to Heaven.So there is no known salvation outside the Church and there can be no known exceptions to John 3:5 and Mark 16:16, past or present, for us human beings.
So the new theology is flawed. It is based on invisible people being visible exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church. But this is the theology of Vatican Council II and the Jewish Left, when they oversee the Church and tell Catholics what is acceptable for influential Talmudic Jews.
This is also the theology of Chris Ferrara and the two pontiffs.
This is not how I interpret Vatican Council II. So there is hope for the future for all of you.Since I have found the missing link after some 50 years.
Nothing has to be changed in Vatican Council II.But when the two pontiffs , the Society of St. Pius X and Chris Ferrara interpret Vatican Council II with the irrationality it has to be rejected immediately.
LAY CATHOLICS STOP THE HERESY ON VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EENS
Lay Catholics must stop the heresy being taught in the Church from the parish priest to the two pontiffs.Do something about it.I have written enough on this subject to make you understand.
An average lay Catholic knows that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and blood, with or without the baptism of water, and being saved in invincible ignorance cannot be visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.So there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict Feeneyite EENS.
So 'the Church' has made a mistake.
The magisterium from Pope Pius XII to Pope Francis has made a mistake.
The 'present magisterium' is opposed to the past magisterium. They contradict each other. So one of them is wrong.Pope Benedict XVI confirmed it in March 2016 when he said in the interview in Avvenire that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries of the 16th century.He was not willing to affirm the strict intepretation of the dogma EENS. He was not willing to say that Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) was not an exception to EENS as it was known to the 16th century magisterium. He wanted to, he chose to interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise.He was so blatant and heretical and no one objected to it. This is because the lay people are being taught errors in doctrine by the magisterium, the liberals and traditionalists.
So affirm the strict interpretation fo the dogma EENS in harmony with Vatican Council II and ask you religious leaders, parish priests, bishops and cardinals, wherever you are to do the same.
Do not fall for the leftist or traditionalist interpretation of EENS.