en.news
2132.8K

Trump Couldn't Succeed - We Did

For fifteen years, Gloria.tv has developed as a fully functional, technically totally independent (= no backdoors to secret services) social media. Social communication is about information, knowledge, entertainment, fun. As a priest from Mexico wrote us last week, “Your page has been a great blessing for my spiritual life and my ministry.“

But: Social communication is also about power, freedom and survival. It is also a weapon, and, today, it is used as a weapon.

PLEASE, donate this Lent to Gloria.tv:
-via a bank transfer to: IBAN AT67 6000 0102 1003 6488 / BIC BAWAATWW
- via Credit Card or PayPal using Kindful


Former US president Donald Trump understood only after he was banned on the big platforms, that free commercial social media do not exist. Therefore, he announced to start his own platform. But those familiar with social media technology knew that it is impossible to create an “online town" within a few months. At this point, not even the registration process of Trump's social network works. Unfortunately, the project seems to be failing. Oligarch media activists correctly describe the platform as a “nonstarter,” a “flop” full of “technical failures.”

What Trump (net worth: $2.5 billion) is not able to do, Gloria.tv has been doing for the past fifteen years. We have managed to develop a social media platform that simply works. It's not as simple as you may think. Think of user uploads, converting processes, chats, notifications, the 'like' system, valuing and listing content, video calls, filters, individualised opening page… and all this massively scalable (= open to any amount of users).

Gloria.tv has built its own technology. No venture capital, no stocks. Nevertheless, it is working and growing, only with YOUR donations, financed exclusively by God's "oligarchs," i.e. the famous grandmothers with their rosaries, the little ones, the poor, some priests, some friends, some relatives. THANK YOU ALL.

Living with very limited funds from the beginning, we generated a loss of € 4,000 last year and tightened the belt ever more in 2022. But still: In all these years, Holy Providence enabled us to pay our bills and, like an invisible hand, helped us to develop Gloria.tv.

To cut things short: The commercial social media have turned into instruments of censorship because they use and block communication according to the ideology of their owners. They have morphed into a Woke-Communist Party. So: Who will protects the interests and the communication of the Church in a time when money and insanity rules?

God alone knows what will become of Gloria.tv and why he put all of us into this project, our donors, the writers, the readers, WE are ALL partakers of Gloria.tv. As the current uncertain times unfold around us, for Gloria.tv, the best is yet to come.

Please help Gloria.tv also in this Lent with your alms:
-via a bank transfer to: IBAN AT67 6000 0102 1003 6488 / BIC BAWAATWW
- via Credit Card or PayPal using Kindful

Picture: © CommScope, Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND, #newsOxhvjdnpjf

02:18
Gast6 shares this
1195
Russian watchdog Roskomnadzor says Facebook is now completely blocked in the country (RIA)
Wilma Lopez
Free speech - actual free speech - is the enemy of all tyranny. When any entity - governmental or private - takes to itself the power to determine what is or is not "misinformation," freedom is lessened and tyranny wins.
De Profundis shares this
196
"Use well what you have been given, even more will be given." Luke 19:26
Seidenspinner
Alex A
@luisfcrcoelho- If Trump be a "corrupt scumbag" what does that say about President Biden?
De Profundis
Gloria.tv is getting better each year.
Alex A
@michael newman > Who might the trolls be?
philosopher
If it walks like a duck, sounds like a duck, looks like duck, then, it's a duck.
가입을 원합니다
Blocking everywhere on this portal. Especially Polish directory.
No offence.
philosopher
@Mathathias Maccabeus Unfortunately many Catholics have departed from the realism of the scholastics and fallen prey to post-modern semantics (a form of nominalism). The cause of the duck is its duckness, as Plato would say- or its essence. Definitions are only articulations of what the thing is and are either in conformity with the things essence or not. So, not all definitions are equal in part …More
@Mathathias Maccabeus Unfortunately many Catholics have departed from the realism of the scholastics and fallen prey to post-modern semantics (a form of nominalism). The cause of the duck is its duckness, as Plato would say- or its essence. Definitions are only articulations of what the thing is and are either in conformity with the things essence or not. So, not all definitions are equal in part due to erroneous presuppositions and subjective biases that people hold. Another way of saying is there are many opinions but only one truth.
philosopher
@Mathathias Maccabeus I was just being facetious. A things -isness is its nature or essence, and cognizing this is the goal of philosophy according to Plato. And that was my point, there are many definitions of a troll but what is it in reality? Some of the properties of a troll is an online contrarian who enjoys arguing via provocation and emotional manipulation. They thrill in getting a rile out …More
@Mathathias Maccabeus I was just being facetious. A things -isness is its nature or essence, and cognizing this is the goal of philosophy according to Plato. And that was my point, there are many definitions of a troll but what is it in reality? Some of the properties of a troll is an online contrarian who enjoys arguing via provocation and emotional manipulation. They thrill in getting a rile out of their opponent and will keep the argumentation going to no end enjoying the frustration, anger and stress they sow in an online forum. This gives them a sense of intellectual superiority and power over their online targets. They will never cease until their responders cease posting as they always get in the last word, a sign that they have won and are superior. It is the hallmark of an anti-social and narcissistic personality.

I've read your posts and interacted in some discussions with you, and you definitely don't fit the characteristics of a troll. You seem to genuinely want to engage in a dialectical discussion in order to advance and move toward a greater understanding and grasp of the truth of the matter at hand. And, your discussions are respectful and without provocation.

Pax et bonum
Ultraviolet
@philosopher The SSPX certainly grows some awfully sour grapes in its vineyard. ;-) Constantly crying "troll" and "narcissist" have become the rallying cry of GTV's Losers' Club. Like any other lie, it doesn't become true simply because spiteful people keep repeating it. All it shows is how dedicated they are to perpetuating falsehood. Considering the worst culprits of that around here, such behavior …More
@philosopher The SSPX certainly grows some awfully sour grapes in its vineyard. ;-) Constantly crying "troll" and "narcissist" have become the rallying cry of GTV's Losers' Club. Like any other lie, it doesn't become true simply because spiteful people keep repeating it. All it shows is how dedicated they are to perpetuating falsehood. Considering the worst culprits of that around here, such behavior is consistent with their entire world-view.
Ultraviolet
3 more comments from Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet
@Mathathias Maccabeus You have to remember @Steve D is simply referencing his mentor Goebbels by repeating a lie until it "sticks". Meanwhile that fatuous fraud @michael newman curiously overlooks that stunt in his very pointed and equally selective criteria of "trolls".
Ultraviolet
I'm not as charitable as you, Matty. Pointed remarks are pointed enough even without using an "@"
Ultraviolet
"I and all of GTV readership identify you as a troll." You don't speak for GTV, @michael newman Only yourself. On that note,
"Easy to spot trolls..."
"Repeated posts."
Check. Especially on the topic of "trolling"
"Ad hominem attacks." Check.
"Going after the same victim." Check.
"Sees themselves as the self appointed educators of others on GTV."
-Not only self-appointed educator but also spokesmanMore
"I and all of GTV readership identify you as a troll." You don't speak for GTV, @michael newman Only yourself. On that note,
"Easy to spot trolls..."
"Repeated posts."
Check. Especially on the topic of "trolling"
"Ad hominem attacks." Check.
"Going after the same victim." Check.
"Sees themselves as the self appointed educators of others on GTV."
-Not only self-appointed educator but also spokesman!
"Quick to take offence." Check.
Nice list, Mike.You fulfill all of your criteria.
"But you are not the only one trolling here." Irony much?
What's really awful to see is your selective critiism and outright hypocrisy in doing so.
Wilma Lopez
Trump couldn't write a social media software within months. But he didn't know how complicate this is.