Lliterally true. The vaccine does NOT promise immunity, and the manufacturer - as are all manufacturers of vaccines, but of course not other medical products - is immune to legal recourse in case of harm.
laurelmarycecilia
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
1986 Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act Regan signed the bill................ nothing to do with 'emergency'
mccallansteve
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
The manufactures of the vaccine believe in their god; The almighty dollar.
The manufacturers are immune from prosecution because it was considered an emergency. There wasn't time for thorough testing.
Almost all medications aren't 100% effective. I was vaccinated for Singles in 2012. It was a vaccine using a disabled virus and considered 60% effective. A few years later I was vaccinated again, this time using serum produced via DNA technology--85-90%.More
The manufacturers are immune from prosecution because it was considered an emergency. There wasn't time for thorough testing.
Almost all medications aren't 100% effective. I was vaccinated for Singles in 2012. It was a vaccine using a disabled virus and considered 60% effective. A few years later I was vaccinated again, this time using serum produced via DNA technology--85-90%.
Almost all medications aren't 100% effective. I was vaccinated for Singles in 2012. It was a vaccine using a disabled virus and considered 60% effective. A few years later I was vaccinated again, this time using serum produced via DNA technology--85-90%.
Holy Cannoli
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
I was vaccinated for Singles in 2012.
If you remained "single", I'd say the vaccine was effective. 
More
I was vaccinated for Singles in 2012.
If you remained "single", I'd say the vaccine was effective.
If you remained "single", I'd say the vaccine was effective.