Heroic Cardinal Sarah Met Benedict - Lying Gänswein Rebutted
Cardinal Sarah just wrote on Twitter.com that he met on January 17 with the former Benedict XVI because of "incessant polemics" against the Ratzinger/Sarah book on celibacy. Sarah calls these polemics …More
Cardinal Sarah just wrote on Twitter.com that he met on January 17 with the former Benedict XVI because of "incessant polemics" against the Ratzinger/Sarah book on celibacy.
Sarah calls these polemics "nauseating" and "lying."
He continues, “With Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, we were able to see how there is no misunderstanding between us. I came out of this beautiful conversation very happy, full of peace and courage.”
The word “misunderstanding” was used by Archbishop Gänswein to justify the removal of Benedict's name from the book cover.
Gänswein pretended that Benedict "didn't see" the book before January 13.
However, Sarah corrected him revealing that he sent the full manuscript to Benedict on November 19 and showed him personally the book, including the cover, on December 3.
Picture: Robert Sarah, © Mazur, CC BY-NC-SA, #newsHeufozcxrz
Sarah calls these polemics "nauseating" and "lying."
He continues, “With Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, we were able to see how there is no misunderstanding between us. I came out of this beautiful conversation very happy, full of peace and courage.”
The word “misunderstanding” was used by Archbishop Gänswein to justify the removal of Benedict's name from the book cover.
Gänswein pretended that Benedict "didn't see" the book before January 13.
However, Sarah corrected him revealing that he sent the full manuscript to Benedict on November 19 and showed him personally the book, including the cover, on December 3.
Picture: Robert Sarah, © Mazur, CC BY-NC-SA, #newsHeufozcxrz
Thors Catholic Hammer
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
The basic issue is papal authority. Any pope has full authority over all liturgical rites.
If he wants to change them he can. Popes prior to Pius x11 did so.
To claim that a pope could bind every future pope for all time on the liturgy of the Holy Mass is absurd and irrational.
The mass itself developed organically since the Last Supper and to claim that Pius V could freeze the mass forever in its …More
The basic issue is papal authority. Any pope has full authority over all liturgical rites.
If he wants to change them he can. Popes prior to Pius x11 did so.
To claim that a pope could bind every future pope for all time on the liturgy of the Holy Mass is absurd and irrational.
The mass itself developed organically since the Last Supper and to claim that Pius V could freeze the mass forever in its then form in the 16th century is deeply irrational.
F rancis is not a pope since the Chair of St Peter remains occupied by Pope Benedict.
If I am wrong on that then F rancis is not a pope because he is a public formal heretic and such can not be a pope.
If he wants to change them he can. Popes prior to Pius x11 did so.
To claim that a pope could bind every future pope for all time on the liturgy of the Holy Mass is absurd and irrational.
The mass itself developed organically since the Last Supper and to claim that Pius V could freeze the mass forever in its then form in the 16th century is deeply irrational.
F rancis is not a pope since the Chair of St Peter remains occupied by Pope Benedict.
If I am wrong on that then F rancis is not a pope because he is a public formal heretic and such can not be a pope.