Tosatti: Ratzinger Considers Himself Pope
MarcoTosatti.com (February 15) reports the claim of a “very high” Vatican prelate, likely a cardinal, that Joseph Ratzinger feels he is "Pope" and "not retired." He published the Ratzinger/Sarah book …More
MarcoTosatti.com (February 15) reports the claim of a “very high” Vatican prelate, likely a cardinal, that Joseph Ratzinger feels he is "Pope" and "not retired."
He published the Ratzinger/Sarah book to make this manifest, the source insists.
According to the prelate, Francis understood this and "got scared,” which caused him to change the text of “Querida Amazonia.”
The problem: Ratzinger keeps vigorously contradicting such claims.
Picture: © Mazur, CC BY-NC-SA, #newsPzyypohqmi
He published the Ratzinger/Sarah book to make this manifest, the source insists.
According to the prelate, Francis understood this and "got scared,” which caused him to change the text of “Querida Amazonia.”
The problem: Ratzinger keeps vigorously contradicting such claims.
Picture: © Mazur, CC BY-NC-SA, #newsPzyypohqmi
Ultraviolet
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
"Ultaviolet is indeed a pedantic troll quibbling over the most petty of details"
...as contrasted with @Thors Catholic Hammer who believes making claims up out thin air and telling lies constitutes proof. ;-)
Or a cup-rattling shill who's quick to complain about "public calumny" then calumniates someone who beat him at his own game of arm-chair canonical lawyer.
In a way, Frà Alexis Bugnolo this …More
"Ultaviolet is indeed a pedantic troll quibbling over the most petty of details"
...as contrasted with @Thors Catholic Hammer who believes making claims up out thin air and telling lies constitutes proof. ;-)
Or a cup-rattling shill who's quick to complain about "public calumny" then calumniates someone who beat him at his own game of arm-chair canonical lawyer.
In a way, Frà Alexis Bugnolo this bitterness from you is music to my ears. Honestly. I might be flippant here, but unlike your buddy Thor, I'm truthful.
I was exceedingly curious what rejoinder you were going offer when I deconstructed your arguments on Canon Law. Here, I thought, is a polyglot who's poured through Canon Law. Why were his canonical arguments so flawed, so easily countered? He must be advancing them as pawns for some clever checkmate conclusion.
It had to be something predicated on me decisively knocking them down..It's some kind of a trap... But what? I admit, truly, I was nervous.
And what do I get instead? "durr hurr yerra troll. cuz you disagree wiff me." Tell me I haven't overestimated you THAT badly, Fra! Say it ain't so!
Or was that your best shot at playing pro bono canon lawyer for Benedict? And then you wonder why the legal minds in the Vatican don't even give your letter the courtesy of a reply, Latin notwithstanding. If I can tear through your argument with nothing more than, well, let's call it a layperson's understanding of the law, how many more opportunities must present themselves to the professionals?
Strange you should call me a troll these days, no less. Seems you've forgotten nearly all my comments on this subject are replies to Thor's endless fabrications. GTV now has a parrot squawking the same baseless accusations about Pope Francis and Benedict's resignation over and over again. He's been caught in so many falsehoods, they're becoming redundant.
Yet that doesn't attract your ire even when those comments are dropped like guano on just about every post, regardless of the subject. As with your pretensions at Canon Law you see only what you wish to and ignore the rest.
As I've said before, I don't like Francis and I've said so repeatedly to you, Frà Alexis Bugnolo .I wish Francis wasn't Pope. So why claim otherwise with your twaddle about defending the St. Gallens mafia?
Why resort to the same kind of deliberate falsehoods you apparently admire in that "courageous interlocutor"? Are you that petty? Does the truth count so little to supposedly devout Catholic Fransiscan friar?
Seems birds of a feather flock together, including Butthurt Bluejays and Falsehood Finches. ;-)
...as contrasted with @Thors Catholic Hammer who believes making claims up out thin air and telling lies constitutes proof. ;-)
Or a cup-rattling shill who's quick to complain about "public calumny" then calumniates someone who beat him at his own game of arm-chair canonical lawyer.
In a way, Frà Alexis Bugnolo this bitterness from you is music to my ears. Honestly. I might be flippant here, but unlike your buddy Thor, I'm truthful.
I was exceedingly curious what rejoinder you were going offer when I deconstructed your arguments on Canon Law. Here, I thought, is a polyglot who's poured through Canon Law. Why were his canonical arguments so flawed, so easily countered? He must be advancing them as pawns for some clever checkmate conclusion.
It had to be something predicated on me decisively knocking them down..It's some kind of a trap... But what? I admit, truly, I was nervous.
And what do I get instead? "durr hurr yerra troll. cuz you disagree wiff me." Tell me I haven't overestimated you THAT badly, Fra! Say it ain't so!
Or was that your best shot at playing pro bono canon lawyer for Benedict? And then you wonder why the legal minds in the Vatican don't even give your letter the courtesy of a reply, Latin notwithstanding. If I can tear through your argument with nothing more than, well, let's call it a layperson's understanding of the law, how many more opportunities must present themselves to the professionals?
Strange you should call me a troll these days, no less. Seems you've forgotten nearly all my comments on this subject are replies to Thor's endless fabrications. GTV now has a parrot squawking the same baseless accusations about Pope Francis and Benedict's resignation over and over again. He's been caught in so many falsehoods, they're becoming redundant.
Yet that doesn't attract your ire even when those comments are dropped like guano on just about every post, regardless of the subject. As with your pretensions at Canon Law you see only what you wish to and ignore the rest.
As I've said before, I don't like Francis and I've said so repeatedly to you, Frà Alexis Bugnolo .I wish Francis wasn't Pope. So why claim otherwise with your twaddle about defending the St. Gallens mafia?
Why resort to the same kind of deliberate falsehoods you apparently admire in that "courageous interlocutor"? Are you that petty? Does the truth count so little to supposedly devout Catholic Fransiscan friar?
Seems birds of a feather flock together, including Butthurt Bluejays and Falsehood Finches. ;-)
Thors Catholic Hammer
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
@
Ultraviolet
The endless hatred and false accusations you vent at myself and Br.Bugnolo render your position void of credibility.
Both he and I believe Benedict is still pope.
I have not told lies as you constantly allege.
You are free to disagree with our positions but you render your arguments devoid of merit on account of the sheer hatred and calumnies you consistently issue.
Ultraviolet
The endless hatred and false accusations you vent at myself and Br.Bugnolo render your position void of credibility.
Both he and I believe Benedict is still pope.
I have not told lies as you constantly allege.
You are free to disagree with our positions but you render your arguments devoid of merit on account of the sheer hatred and calumnies you consistently issue.