Gloria.tv
1215K
03:26
Judgment against Austrian Pro-Lifers. On April 4, the single judge Erik Nauta, of the regional court of Graz, sentenced four pro-lifers to high penalties for stalking. They are charged with having …More
Judgment against Austrian Pro-Lifers.
On April 4, the single judge Erik Nauta, of the regional court of Graz, sentenced four pro-lifers to high penalties for stalking.
They are charged with having repeatedly stalked the Graz-based abortionist, Johannes Hanfstingl.
Judge Nauta also convicted the Austrian director of the pro-life organization Human Life International, Dietmar Fischer, for stalking in Graz – although the latter works in Vienna not Graz. His fine is 180 daily rates of 40 euros each totaling 7.200 euros. ($10,000.00 US Dollars)
Furthermore, the two activists who offered help on the sidewalks and one woman who worked as a consultant were sentenced to fines between 450 and 840 euros. ($600.00 - $1200.00 USD)
Gloria.tv is in possession of the contradictory reasons given for the judgment as well as the appeal made against the unjust verdict.
Nauta claims that the accused had deliberately planned to stalk the abortionist.
The pro-lifers responded by saying that in Graz – as in …More
AK
Peace! Good news when peaceful pro-life protesters are being subject to persecution. Sounds to me that the judge is not pro-life, hence the costly verdict despite the evidence for those keeping a regular peaceful protest. Possibly grounds for a counter-suit for harassment and violation of civil rights to peacefully protest an grievous injustice (unborn death penalty). Stalking has a broad definition -More
Peace! Good news when peaceful pro-life protesters are being subject to persecution. Sounds to me that the judge is not pro-life, hence the costly verdict despite the evidence for those keeping a regular peaceful protest. Possibly grounds for a counter-suit for harassment and violation of civil rights to peacefully protest an grievous injustice (unborn death penalty). Stalking has a broad definition - commonly used to refer to unwanted, obsessive attention by individuals (and sometimes groups of people) to others. In our country, we're required to stay at a goodly distance to lessen any feeling of being threatened by those entering clinics and they're at liberty to approach for information or not.