@@Ultraviolet
“Thanks , Captain . Can we get a real pope now?”

But utter fools like you never shut up roaring and screaming that Bergoglio is in fact a real pope.
You spend many hours defending his validity as pope when every existential fact screams that the man is a formal heretic and as such can not be a pope.
It’s really all to much for you and hence you pour bile on anybody who says he is not a pope.
Poor conflicted you.

Wrong as usual, Thors Catholic Hammer I claim Francis is Pope, not "Bergoglio". Which makes your next criticism kinda funny...

"utter fools like you..."

...said the man who finished his post crying like a little girl how "you pour bile on anybody who...".

Like every hypocrite, your double-standards are in full view. You have no trouble hurling your scorn but you're SO sensitive to any of it from others.

"...you never shut up roaring and screaming "

And today, Thors Catholic Parrot shows GTV what psychological projection sounds like.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

YOU are the one who never shuts up with the same old garbage, you silly parrot.

"Anypope Francis! RAWWK! Communion on the tongue spreads coronavirus! RAWWK! Priestly celibacy isn't necessary! RAWWK!"

As for "roaring and screaming" It's a rare week that goes by without at least two or three comments mostly underlined or all Bold Text.

"when every existential fact screams..."

Hyperbole coupled with another one of your invented "band-wagon" supports. This is a standard fall-back for you. Whenever you're wrong you fabricate some new "group" who just happen, surprise-surprise, to agree with you.

Naturally, they're never cited because they don't exist. They're... "everyone knows that..." "most normal Catholics would recognize" or some other phantom group like... "every existential fact screams".

This also demonstrates your fondness for pointless qualifications, in this case to bolster your claim. Not just any fact is screaming here, oh no siree! They're existential facts.... so sophisticated, so literate, so utterly fatuously empty of any relevant meaning.

You couldn't explain the difference between an "existential" and "non-existential" fact if it meant a lifetime supply of premium birdseed and raisins.

Not without googling it first, you silly little charlatan. :P

Off you go, Crackers. There are... Goodness, can it be?

There are at least four, yes, four posts that haven't been spattered white with your droppings about "antipope Francis" yet.

They're getting away, Crackers! They're getting away! :D

"I’m going to stop engaging with you as it’s obvious you are on the edge of some type of breakdown."

Honestly I've been privately thinking much the same about you. Truly. No exaggeration or flippancy. I say that before God.

You're becoming more combative over a wider range of issues. It isn't just "antipope Francis" anymore or "Benedict didn't really resign". Those two are your default crazies.

But lately there are a lot more and you're arguing with everyone over them.

First it was, "communion on the tongue spreads disease". That riled up a bunch of folks. Now it's "priestly celibacy isn't necessary" and most recently you're viciously lashing out at every cardinal, bishop, and priest who isn't ranting against Pope Francis the way you do. Which is all of them.

Seriously, Thor... you need to pick your battles.

"Mind yourself Ultraviolet our engagement might have been positive..."

:D :D It's only fair I say thank-you, Thor. You gave me a real-deal, no-foolin' LOL with that comment. You? Positive engagement? :D :D

Oh, man... that's a hoot and a hoot isn't what I'd expect from a parrot. :D