The death of, "Just the facts ma'am..."
firstthings.com

The Australian Disgrace | George Weigel

There has never been any “evidence” that Cardinal Pell did what he was alleged to have done.
GTVisrockin likes this.
Thanks for the lesson in humility o holy one.
rafferju
@Holy Cannoli you were right there is no point replying to such an egotistical poster so filled with the value of their own opinion. The poster clearly has shown that he/she doesn’t understand basic principles of the law and thus why the Aussie decision is so outrageous.
rafferju

Gloria.tv’s very own obsessive anti-Pell jihadist may have deep psychological issues that belies the seriousness and pathology of his daily tirades. Perhaps he was denied birthday parties growing up as a child. So, in frustration, today he lashes out. Perhaps he was an outcast among his school mates for being a jerk. So, in frustration, today he lashes out. Perhaps his overbearing …More
rafferju

Gloria.tv’s very own obsessive anti-Pell jihadist may have deep psychological issues that belies the seriousness and pathology of his daily tirades. Perhaps he was denied birthday parties growing up as a child. So, in frustration, today he lashes out. Perhaps he was an outcast among his school mates for being a jerk. So, in frustration, today he lashes out. Perhaps his overbearing personality disorder led to repeated opposite sex relationship failures. So, today, in frustration he lashes out. Perhaps he is dissatisfied with his current 'lot in life' so, in frustration he lashes out. The cause of his abnormal obsession could be some of these issues, all of them or even others. Who knows?

What is known is that his obsession repeatedly demonstrated on these boards is not normal and can indicate an even greater psychological disorder such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, a personality disorder, or organic (caused by a medical condition) brain syndrome.

Simply put, well adjusted individuals don’t act like obsessive jihadists. It is for this reason that discussions with such an individual would accomplish nothing, be a waste of time and would further fuel his pathological condition.
And why would he not testify at trial if he's the innocent martyr?

I would never claim that any living person was a martyr. Regardless, I’m gong to answer that question for you even though I regard you as an arrogant punk.

If you knew ANYTHING about the law you would know why defendants may or may not choose to testify at trial. But, that would be impossible for an arrogant, poopy head who …More
And why would he not testify at trial if he's the innocent martyr?

I would never claim that any living person was a martyr. Regardless, I’m gong to answer that question for you even though I regard you as an arrogant punk.

If you knew ANYTHING about the law you would know why defendants may or may not choose to testify at trial. But, that would be impossible for an arrogant, poopy head who protests way too much and who has demonstrated a daily, inordinate jones against Cardinal Pell.

blogs.findlaw.com/…/5-reasons-defen…
-----------------------------------------------
I will not respond to you or waste any more time with you for the above reasons.
rafferju likes this.
Like OJ right. You as a legal beagle inferred innocence from that tactic too I presume.
Even though OJ was guilty yet acquitted in the first trial, Justice did catch up to him in the end. At least in the U.S.A they give or at least try to give an accused a fair go but NOT in Australia, you are automatically guilty if you are a Catholic priest especially one who is so hated by the mob for his fidelity to Christ and his church. OJ is a mere man who was evil, Cardinal Pell is not just …More
Even though OJ was guilty yet acquitted in the first trial, Justice did catch up to him in the end. At least in the U.S.A they give or at least try to give an accused a fair go but NOT in Australia, you are automatically guilty if you are a Catholic priest especially one who is so hated by the mob for his fidelity to Christ and his church. OJ is a mere man who was evil, Cardinal Pell is not just a mere man, he is an apostle of Christ, and for those who know this apostle knows he would never ever do anything that he was accused of by that sick perverted accuser. Some people like you who know nothing about this great humble apostle is playing with God's divine judgement
I know why you hate Pell and you do to. God will be your judge but I sure hate to be in your shoes!
'Does.' Is he himself credible or not? And why would he not testify at trial if he's the innocent martyr?
What do these videos tell you about Pell's credibility?
That's he's lying through his teeth. "Pell's Tells," I call them. Look at his remarks to the Foster family! Their child's blood (actually two children, plus innumerable others raped by priests Pell protected, either moving them himself or knowing of same) is on his hands; and he knows it; and he doesn't give a darn.

I find his friendship with and defense of Ridsdale Sr. the Molester highly revea…More
That's he's lying through his teeth. "Pell's Tells," I call them. Look at his remarks to the Foster family! Their child's blood (actually two children, plus innumerable others raped by priests Pell protected, either moving them himself or knowing of same) is on his hands; and he knows it; and he doesn't give a darn.

I find his friendship with and defense of Ridsdale Sr. the Molester highly revealing as well.
You sound pretty convinced of what you know from these videos. Do you suppose there is relevant, even crucial, information outside of these videos regarding the guilt you assign to Cardinal Pell?
GTVisrockin and one more user like this.
GTVisrockin likes this.
rafferju likes this.
Yes. The dozens of not hundreds of kids raped by pederasts on Pell’s watch.

Further. A judge, jury and appellate panel of judges who—unlike us and the talking heads like Der Weigel—who actually heard all the witnesses including this for Pell. They and only they weighed the credibility—and that of Pell’s were deemed unconvincing.
What is your opinion of the reflections of the dissenting judge?
J—Thank you for asking. Bottom line two years f three upheld the jury verdict. The dissent lights in to the victim, but like Weigel does not think to apply the same scrutiny to the defense witnesses. Pell’s Shills as I call them.

I haven’t read the entire dissent so cannot say more. I’ll note the irony of Pell shipping out to the Paedophile prison, as a prominent Australian columnist noted, “…More
J—Thank you for asking. Bottom line two years f three upheld the jury verdict. The dissent lights in to the victim, but like Weigel does not think to apply the same scrutiny to the defense witnesses. Pell’s Shills as I call them.

I haven’t read the entire dissent so cannot say more. I’ll note the irony of Pell shipping out to the Paedophile prison, as a prominent Australian columnist noted, “where Pell will know so many of the priests and brothers there.”

How many of them were beneficiaries of his protection, largesse and cover as auxiliary bishop, bishop and Cardinal-Archbishop of Australia, not to
mention as parish priest shielding Fr. Gerald Ridsdale in Ballarat, Ground Zero of the Pederasty Crisis in the Catholic Church in Australia.

Pell is to be blunt a traitor to his flock, his church and his Lord, our Lord Jesus Christ. There tragically is blood on his hands.

Our Lady of Fatima pray for us.
rafferju
@Jungerheld seems oblivious to the fact that you have calmly asked questions demolishing his posts.
Yes. Have you watched them? If so, what's your 'verdict,' on them. Doe the Cardinal appear truthful to you? What are you afraid of, friend.
rafferju
Are you seriously putting up youtube videos defending the corrupt Aussie system, as I already said Gifford four Birmingham 6 spent 20 odd years in jail and failed in many appeals. This court was a joke the way the first trial was conducted. They hid behind closed doors and had the audacity to tell the rest of the world not to report what they were doing. All aussies hang your head in shame. …More
Are you seriously putting up youtube videos defending the corrupt Aussie system, as I already said Gifford four Birmingham 6 spent 20 odd years in jail and failed in many appeals. This court was a joke the way the first trial was conducted. They hid behind closed doors and had the audacity to tell the rest of the world not to report what they were doing. All aussies hang your head in shame. Trying to justify a verdict with irrelevant information to the verdict is ridiculous and shows why he could never get a fair trial
GTVisrockin likes this.
Ignore it, he is from the devil!
If anyone cares to learn more about Cardinal Pell and his sordid past involving pederasty and child-abuse cover-up, including direct past allegations against the Cardinal himself, please see the following.

www.youtube.com/watch

www.youtube.com/watch

Eyewitness testimony is evidence. The judge jury and appellate judges heard the evidence and found it compelling. None of the critics or …More
If anyone cares to learn more about Cardinal Pell and his sordid past involving pederasty and child-abuse cover-up, including direct past allegations against the Cardinal himself, please see the following.

www.youtube.com/watch

www.youtube.com/watch

Eyewitness testimony is evidence. The judge jury and appellate judges heard the evidence and found it compelling. None of the critics or George-the-Martyr crowd have actually heard the witnesses, both for and against. The former were found credible; the latter in the Cardinals defense were not.
Hey Brotherbooffhead i know all about you, bend your knees and ask God to forgive you!!!!
rafferju likes this.