Washington Archdiocese Contradicts Cardinal Wuerl - Confirms Viganò Statement

An allegation of “misconduct” against Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, 88, was presented to then Pittsburgh Bishop Donald Wuerl, 78, already in November 2004, CatholicNewsAgency.com reports (January 10). …
Tesa
Archbishop Vigano on what he told Pope Francis about Cardinal Wuerl: "The Cardinal’s recent statements that he knew nothing about it [McCarrick] are absolutely laughable. He lies shamelessly.”
Tesa
The Cartoon said it already then.
This is the key information, An allegation against McCarrick was presented to Wuerl while he served as Bishop of Pittsburgh.
Lalanz
The Bible is directly calling out the crooked bishops in our times.

2 Peter chapter 2 reads,

“But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them—bringing swift destruction on themselves. Many will follow their depraved conduct and will bring the …More
The Bible is directly calling out the crooked bishops in our times.

2 Peter chapter 2 reads,

“But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them—bringing swift destruction on themselves. Many will follow their depraved conduct and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. In their greed these teachers will exploit you with fabricated stories. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping.

Pray for them
Tesa
A source of Rocco Palmo said Pope Francis wants Wuerl’s DC succession “done” before Feb Summit.
Tesa
He knew about Mc Carrick. We knew he knew. Now his Archdiocese says he knew. He needs to go.
When the victim requests information not to be shared outside church authorities, "back then" their request was probably capable of being honored. Today, the alleged victim's name may be withheld, but there is nothing keeping the accused of protecting their name against alleged abuse. Is this a better situation? It's important to ask, because a whole lot of people are running around acting like …More
When the victim requests information not to be shared outside church authorities, "back then" their request was probably capable of being honored. Today, the alleged victim's name may be withheld, but there is nothing keeping the accused of protecting their name against alleged abuse. Is this a better situation? It's important to ask, because a whole lot of people are running around acting like they want someone's head on a pole, as if that is "the fix", or part of the fix.
alex j likes this.
Tesa
Does Cardinal Wuerl really have the gall to turn up and lead the huge youth Mass at March for Life next week?
alex j likes this.
The rally flyer does not list a celebrant: adw.org/…/YRM4L20192.pdf