If one accepts the narrative that Cdl. Pell could not have committed the alleged offences because the Cathedral sacristy was too busier a place for any such untoward behaviour to occur, then we are left with a number of questions not least of all, the motive of the complainant, the motive[s] of the Victorian Police, what testimony was persuasive enough for a jury to agree upon a unanimous verdict, the media's role in moulding public opinion, etc. No judicial system is perfect, however, the Presiding Judge, in this case, went out of his way to ensure, as humanly possible, that the Cardinal had a fair trial. For example, much of the crucial evidence was heard in camera- only Jury, Judge and Barristers in the court- From my perspective, it would be prudent to await the appeal hearing before declaring the martyrdom or the evilness of the Cardinal.