Viganò: This Was Not a Gesture of “Humility”
It’s impossible to attribute the changes in the Pontifical Yearbook “to a gesture of humility,” because this is not in keeping with Bergoglio’s name being so prominently featured, Archbishop Viganò …More
It’s impossible to attribute the changes in the Pontifical Yearbook “to a gesture of humility,” because this is not in keeping with Bergoglio’s name being so prominently featured, Archbishop Viganò writes on Patreon.com (April 4).
For Viganó it “seems possible” to see in this the admission of a “usurpation,” which indicates that Bergoglio has disavowed the Pontifical titles and reigns now the Church as a private person.
Viganò considers this as an act by which Bergoglio becomes “a tyrant” who is “free to demolish the Church from within, without having to answer to anyone.”
He wonders whether Bergoglio's efforts to rehabilitate Judas “were not a clumsy attempt to exonerate himself.”
#newsRwsnzwtpjl
For Viganó it “seems possible” to see in this the admission of a “usurpation,” which indicates that Bergoglio has disavowed the Pontifical titles and reigns now the Church as a private person.
Viganò considers this as an act by which Bergoglio becomes “a tyrant” who is “free to demolish the Church from within, without having to answer to anyone.”
He wonders whether Bergoglio's efforts to rehabilitate Judas “were not a clumsy attempt to exonerate himself.”
#newsRwsnzwtpjl
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
Gesù è con noi
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Poor Bergoglians who stubbornly believed against all evidence that a heretic could become the Vicar of Christ. That is why Jesus Christ warned that the antichrist would come in his own name.
AlexBKaiser
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Vigano: This chilling thought is further confirmed by the terrible decision to allow an almost universal ban of the public celebration of Easter, for the first time since the Resurrection of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
Vigano: "it seems possible to see in it the admission — passed over in silence — of a sort of usurpation, whereby it is not the “Servus servorum Dei” who reigns, but the person of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who has officially disavowed being the Vicar of Christ...."
eticacasanova
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
That's right, it seems that, now, even he himself said he is NOT the pope ... But it is so from at least two points of view: 1) the direct one, everybody can see: "the Pope is the Vicar of Christ; I'm not the Vicar of Christ; ergo, I'm not the Pope". 2) Parolin, in the name of Berg's "pontificate", tried to explain away the felony by downgrading the Papacy: "those are historial titles that aren't …More
That's right, it seems that, now, even he himself said he is NOT the pope ... But it is so from at least two points of view: 1) the direct one, everybody can see: "the Pope is the Vicar of Christ; I'm not the Vicar of Christ; ergo, I'm not the Pope". 2) Parolin, in the name of Berg's "pontificate", tried to explain away the felony by downgrading the Papacy: "those are historial titles that aren't essential". If they believe that, they don't believe in the Church, they don't believe the Papacy is a real institution of divine origin (cfr. John XXI,15-19), so he can't be something that, in order for you to be it, you should have first to know its meaning: when you accept the nomination, you have to know. Of course, the many times Berg has said that Christ didn't multiply the loaves, "because He was no magician", Berg implied nothing coming from Him is divine. But, this time, it was direct...
Ultraviolet
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Secularizing the office doesn't presuppose renouncing it. There's your mistake.
eticacasanova
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
My post is rethorical, I don't claim that, by this confession of unbelief is a renunciation. In that, you are right. But, even so, a guy with such a lack of faith raises many questions