AlexBKaiser
11985

Brisbane Archbishops Explicitly Rejects Kingship of Christ

This is the Archbishop of Brisbane saying he does not want or have Christ as his King.
CarolineA03
He's not in a position to enter HEAVEN since he refuses to accept the Kingship of Christ - see Scripture......

[28] And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women. [29] Who having heard, was troubled at his saying, and thought with herself what manner of salutation this should be. [30] And the angel said to her: Fear not, …
More
He's not in a position to enter HEAVEN since he refuses to accept the Kingship of Christ - see Scripture......

[28] And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women. [29] Who having heard, was troubled at his saying, and thought with herself what manner of salutation this should be. [30] And the angel said to her: Fear not, Mary, for thou hast found grace with God.

[31] Behold thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and shalt bring forth a son; and thou shalt call his name Jesus. [32] He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the most High; and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of David his father; and he shall reign in the house of Jacob for ever. [33] And of his kingdom there shall be no end

Luke Ch 1 www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d

....and as He is seated ETERNALLY on the Kingdom's of David's Throne, it is His Mother whom is eternally the Queen of that same Kingdom .

Research "Gebirah" of the Kingdom of David. Solomon's Queen was his Mother Bathsheba - it was common practice during the days of the Davidic Kingship. The Throne is eternally Christ's forever by law - and can be found documented in Sacred Scripture.
Lisi Sterndorfer
Does the archbishop observe the Solemnity of Christ the King?
Eva
Psalm 5, "Intende voci orationis meae, Rex meus et Deus meus."
alex j
I live in Australia and I can tell you, as would other Conservative Catholics, that we don't want the likes of the Brisbane Archbishop as Princes of our Catholic Dioceses.
Thoma likes this.
SATAN RESIGN YOU WICKED BEAST
mattsixteen24
Tweet is Archived here:

archive.is/0435O
DefendTruth likes this.
Ivan Tomas
Even Pilat pleaded our Lord as the King!

But the traitors, as they all breed, do not want to accept their God the Lord as the King!
Remember:


"But they cried out: Away with him; away with him; crucify him. Pilate saith to them: Shall I crucify your king? The chief priests answered: We have no king but Caesar." (John 19,15)
The so called Archbishop is only consequent. If you do not believe that Christ is the Eternal Word of God who became Man in Jesus Christ, but rather a man, a human character who was adopted by the Spirit at the moment of baptism in the waters of the River Jordan at the very moment when St. John baptized him, of course you do not enjoy hearing that Christ is King.

Official "Catholic" Christology…More
The so called Archbishop is only consequent. If you do not believe that Christ is the Eternal Word of God who became Man in Jesus Christ, but rather a man, a human character who was adopted by the Spirit at the moment of baptism in the waters of the River Jordan at the very moment when St. John baptized him, of course you do not enjoy hearing that Christ is King.

Official "Catholic" Christology is already free from anything Catholic since the first is now deeply rooted in Spirit Christology. Spirit Christology may be identified as the old heresy of Dynamic Monarchianism and where it is not strait forwardly anti-Trinitarian, it may be just called warmed up Nestorianism, though it's Trinity may not be called one. Just have a look at Cardinal Walter Kasper's new own Christology which he names pneumatologically orientated Christology. In his book "Jesus the Christ" with just a few lines Kasper reconciles Nestorius and does not feel any need to take any distance from him further on. The Holy Ghost is not Christ's Spirit any more, but Kasper together with the Vatican II Church is presenting us a Jesus who is the Christ of the Spirit, the Pneumatic Christ. That was condemned on the Council of Ephesus (can. 9 of the 12 anathemas against Nestorius, Denz. 121; also note can. 7).

The Hegemonikon (lat: principale) of the traditional Christology was the Eternal Word Himself who became Flesh and Man in Jesus Christ. One could speak of the Verbum principale, the Logos hegemonikos. But Kasper who doesn't like St. Cyrill's Christology was looking for a new Hegemonikon to explain Christ's Messianity (which is not worth to be named Incarnation neither hypostatic Union) . He found it just like the Nestorians in the Pneuma, the Spirit. So Kasper shifted from the Logos hegemonikos to the hegemonikon Pneuma, from the Verbum principale to the Spiritus principalis. And so did the Novus Ordo of Episcopal Consecration. The Spiritus principalis is a direct negation of the Christology of the Catholic Church and opposed to the Principale of the Verbum in respect of the Incarnation of the Eternal Son. It almost goes without mentioning that the author of this Novus Ordo rite of Episcopal Consecration, F. Joseph Lécuyer, was himself, too a partisan of Spirit Christology.

Lécuyer worked in the Consilium for the Implementation of Constitution on the Liturgy under Archbishop Annibale Bugnini during the pontificate of Paul VI.

On the supposed invalidity of the Novus Ordo of episcopale consecrations due to its Spirit Christology
CatMuse
The Bishop an Arch of Brisbane
A speaker of comments inane
Of Christ who is King
He knows not a thing
And proves himself clearly insane.
Prayhard and 2 more users like this.
Prayhard likes this.
alex j likes this.
pmfji likes this.
Rafał_Ovile
Post-conciliar hierarchy has dethroned the King and consequently they reject JESUS.
aderito
Jesus is King of Kings and Lord of Lords