Cardinal Müller: Francis Fosters “Man-Made One-World-Religion Without Trinity And Incarnation”
Cardinal Gerhard Müller wrote a lengthy contribution on Die-Tagespost.de (January 21) defending Benedict XVI and celibacy. He argued that celibacy dates back to the apostles and was abolished by the …More
Cardinal Gerhard Müller wrote a lengthy contribution on Die-Tagespost.de (January 21) defending Benedict XVI and celibacy. He argued that celibacy dates back to the apostles and was abolished by the Eastern Churches at the Council in Trullo (691/692) which significantly took place not in a church but in the imperial palace.
This time, Müller even attacks Francis despite his usual strategy to blame the Bergoglians and to spare Francis.
Müller: “The militant atheist Eugenio Scalfari boasts of his friendship with Pope Francis. United in the common idea of a man-made One-World-Religion (without Trinity and Incarnation) he offers him his collaboration.”
In his conclusions, Müller criticises that Scalfari, “who neither believes in God nor in the mystery of the holy Church” is an adviser to Francis.
Picture: © Mazur, CC BY-NC-SA, #newsEhismwuvpw
This time, Müller even attacks Francis despite his usual strategy to blame the Bergoglians and to spare Francis.
Müller: “The militant atheist Eugenio Scalfari boasts of his friendship with Pope Francis. United in the common idea of a man-made One-World-Religion (without Trinity and Incarnation) he offers him his collaboration.”
In his conclusions, Müller criticises that Scalfari, “who neither believes in God nor in the mystery of the holy Church” is an adviser to Francis.
Picture: © Mazur, CC BY-NC-SA, #newsEhismwuvpw
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
Thors Catholic Hammer
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
I have always liked card.Muller.
But he remains confused about who is the real pope.His essay is remarkable and well worth reading.
His references to Immanentisn correctly summarrise the heresies of Bergoglio.
His call for theological clarity on the Petrine succession will probably go unheeded.
His admission that Benedict’s conduct in 2013 caused a mental trauma though welcome provides no rational …More
I have always liked card.Muller.
But he remains confused about who is the real pope.His essay is remarkable and well worth reading.
His references to Immanentisn correctly summarrise the heresies of Bergoglio.
His call for theological clarity on the Petrine succession will probably go unheeded.
His admission that Benedict’s conduct in 2013 caused a mental trauma though welcome provides no rational explanation.
fssp.com/immanentism-cat…
But he remains confused about who is the real pope.His essay is remarkable and well worth reading.
His references to Immanentisn correctly summarrise the heresies of Bergoglio.
His call for theological clarity on the Petrine succession will probably go unheeded.
His admission that Benedict’s conduct in 2013 caused a mental trauma though welcome provides no rational explanation.
fssp.com/immanentism-cat…
Frà Alexis Bugnolo
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Then why do you keep insisting that he is the Vicar of Christ? Is that not implicitly blasphemous?
Thors Catholic Hammer
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Muller is seeking to preserve his sanity and his position.As a cardinal he is intellectually working out what he genuinely thinks is the situation.
But he refuses to follow through with rigor his acceptance that Benedict’s so called resignation has caused mental trauma in the church .
He calls for a theological explanation of clarity concerning the outcome but it is rather weak.
He is defending “…More
Muller is seeking to preserve his sanity and his position.As a cardinal he is intellectually working out what he genuinely thinks is the situation.
But he refuses to follow through with rigor his acceptance that Benedict’s so called resignation has caused mental trauma in the church .
He calls for a theological explanation of clarity concerning the outcome but it is rather weak.
He is defending “pope” Francis becuase one feels he must do this .
But it lacks conviction.
Muller I think would make a good pope not because of his defects but because of his sincerity.
But he refuses to follow through with rigor his acceptance that Benedict’s so called resignation has caused mental trauma in the church .
He calls for a theological explanation of clarity concerning the outcome but it is rather weak.
He is defending “pope” Francis becuase one feels he must do this .
But it lacks conviction.
Muller I think would make a good pope not because of his defects but because of his sincerity.
Frà Alexis Bugnolo
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
God spare us from minds like Muller's on the Apostolic Throne!
Thors Catholic Hammer
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
He , agreed is not perfect, however from the bunch of apostates that now comprise the now decadent catholic college of cardinals who else is there.
.Burke?
Maybe.
Time will tell.
.Burke?
Maybe.
Time will tell.
Ivan Tomas
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
@dpfurey,
Well, was St. Athanasius the Great not just the only one man then?
Well, was St. Athanasius the Great not just the only one man then?
Frà Alexis Bugnolo
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Ivan, how true. When a man is for God purely and totally, he knows that God is with him and will defend him, because he exists to serve the Divine Will. These Cardinals by their silence condemn themselves as having no living faith.