dpfurey
Remember when "follow your conscience, if the pope is wrong" meant you were a Protestant? Those were good times....
Ultraviolet likes this.
Burke is grand as far as it goes.
But just who is the pope?
I never had to ask that question until Pope Benedict XVI,s weird flawed declaration in 2013 and the even weirder conclave with its supernaturally horrific outcome.
Since I can not be certain as to who the pope is since 2013 and since the pope back then still lives, as a catholic my duty is to adopt the safe option and deem Benedict the …More
Burke is grand as far as it goes.
But just who is the pope?
I never had to ask that question until Pope Benedict XVI,s weird flawed declaration in 2013 and the even weirder conclave with its supernaturally horrific outcome.
Since I can not be certain as to who the pope is since 2013 and since the pope back then still lives, as a catholic my duty is to adopt the safe option and deem Benedict the only possible pope.
Actually, if you truly cared about the subject, you would have asked "But just who is the pope" a long time before Benedict. It will be interesting to see what your "catholic duty" suggests after Benedict XVI's passing.
Its not a matter of caring but a matter of truth. You are indifferent to truth based on your egregious unproven false accusations of doctrinal heresy against sitting popes.
Im still awaiting to hear from you with one single case of papal doctrinal heresy from a sitting pope.

I suggest you look to your own passing .
Oh, you care about the truth, do you? The truth is many people find evidence of doctrinal heresy in the last four popes just as you do with Francis. It is you who are indifferent to the truth because you refuse to exonerate these men.

If the claims are "egregious unproven false accusations", then you have a duty as a loyal and devout Catholic to dispel such errors. Why aren't you doing …More
Oh, you care about the truth, do you? The truth is many people find evidence of doctrinal heresy in the last four popes just as you do with Francis. It is you who are indifferent to the truth because you refuse to exonerate these men.

If the claims are "egregious unproven false accusations", then you have a duty as a loyal and devout Catholic to dispel such errors. Why aren't you doing that, Thor? How strange.

"Im still awaiting to hear from you with one single case of papal doctrinal heresy from a sitting pope."

The current "sitting Pope" is Francis. ;-)

Oh, you walked right into that one. You got all tangled up in those qualifications you use to make your drivel sound more erudite.

Surely you don't need me to find "doctrinal heresies" from Francis. On GTV? Please. :p

Does the Abu Dhabi Document ring any bells for you, chum?

As for Benedict XVI... well. He's had quite a few more, several advanced when he was stil Cardinal Ratzinger which calls into his papal validity. Not that he's a "sitting pope" anymore and that is what you demanded.

www.calefactory.org/misc-v2-heresiesofb16.htm