Benedict Is Dead: Gänswein’s Memoirs Are Already Printed
Archbishop Georg Gänswein will publish on January 12 Nient'altro che la verità. La mia vita al fianco di Benedetto XVI (Nothing but the Truth: My …
- Report
Social networks
Change post
Remove post
Sandy Barrett shares this
- Report
Remove share
Gänswein to publish book, “Nothing but the Truth: My Life Beside Pope Benedict XVI”
giveusthisday
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
the ss
The St. Gallen Mafia opposed him.
The St. Gallen Mafia opposed him.
Laura Yunque
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
It isn't about being liturgically comfortable, but about belief. There is far more at stake here than liturgical form.
Arthur McGowan
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
The liturgy is a source of Sacred Tradition. The "reforms" of 1955 onward are wholly illegitimate.
Salvatore Bastatti
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Sorry, Lisis Sterndorfer, but here is what I also remember about Josef Ratzinger: Ratzinger advanced the heresy that the Jews (Talmudists) could enter into Heaven by adherence to the Old Covenant and without recourse to faith in Jesus Christ, contradicting Christ Himself, Who had proclaimed: "No one comes to the Father, but by me."
This is very serious business, one's faith in Christ. I have …More
Sorry, Lisis Sterndorfer, but here is what I also remember about Josef Ratzinger: Ratzinger advanced the heresy that the Jews (Talmudists) could enter into Heaven by adherence to the Old Covenant and without recourse to faith in Jesus Christ, contradicting Christ Himself, Who had proclaimed: "No one comes to the Father, but by me."
This is very serious business, one's faith in Christ. I have encountered Jewish rabbis who almost seem to want to smirk in their denial of Christ as the only way to His Father. In turn I have responded with Christ's monitum, "Women of Jerusalem weep not for me but for yourselves and your children."
I recall vividly the sanctity of Eugenio Pacelli-- he was Pope when I was born.
He was nothing like what attempts to pass for Roman Catholicism today. Ratzinger should have revoked the Novus Ordo. He did not.
This is very serious business, one's faith in Christ. I have encountered Jewish rabbis who almost seem to want to smirk in their denial of Christ as the only way to His Father. In turn I have responded with Christ's monitum, "Women of Jerusalem weep not for me but for yourselves and your children."
I recall vividly the sanctity of Eugenio Pacelli-- he was Pope when I was born.
He was nothing like what attempts to pass for Roman Catholicism today. Ratzinger should have revoked the Novus Ordo. He did not.
Cath intruth
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
"Ratzinger should have revoked the Novus Ordo".
Agree.
I don't understand why he never seemed to really see the demolition of our Faith wrought by the Novus Ordo Mass.
Agree.
I don't understand why he never seemed to really see the demolition of our Faith wrought by the Novus Ordo Mass.
Lisi Sterndorfer shares this
- Report
Remove share
"I believe it broke Pope Benedict's heart to read the new motu proprio (TC) because his intention had been to help those who simply found a home in the old Mass to find inner peace, to find liturgical peace, in order to draw them away from Lefebvre". -Abp Ganswein
Arthur McGowan
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
TC was chock-full of lies:
That Lefebvre started a "schism."
That the purpose of SP was to end the "schism."
That SP had "failed," and thus it must be nullified for the sake of "unity."
That the current liturgical books are the "unique expression" of the Roman Rite. I.e., that the pre-1963 missal and other books are not expressions of the Roman Rite.More
TC was chock-full of lies:
That Lefebvre started a "schism."
That the purpose of SP was to end the "schism."
That SP had "failed," and thus it must be nullified for the sake of "unity."
That the current liturgical books are the "unique expression" of the Roman Rite. I.e., that the pre-1963 missal and other books are not expressions of the Roman Rite.
That Lefebvre started a "schism."
That the purpose of SP was to end the "schism."
That SP had "failed," and thus it must be nullified for the sake of "unity."
That the current liturgical books are the "unique expression" of the Roman Rite. I.e., that the pre-1963 missal and other books are not expressions of the Roman Rite.