Hello, I am Rainer Fulmich and I have been admitted to the bar in Germany and in California for 26 years.
I have been practicing law primarily as a trial lawyer against fraudulent corporations such as Deutsche Bank,
formerly one of the world's largest and most respected banks, today one of the most toxic criminal organizations in the world.
VW, one of the world's largest and most respected car manufacturers, today notorious for its giant diesel fraud,
and Kühne & Nagel, the world's largest shipping company, were suing them in a multi-million dollar bribery case.
I'm also one of four members of the German Corona Investigative Committee.
Since July 10th, 2020, this committee has been listening to a large number of
international scientists and experts testimony to find answers to questions about the corona crisis,
which more and more people worldwide are asking.
All the above mentioned cases of corruption and fraud committed by the German corporations pale in comparison in view of the extent of the damage that the Corona crisis has caused and continues to cause.
This Corona crisis, according to all we know today, must be renamed a Corona scandal, and those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages.
On a political level, everything must be done to make sure that no one will ever again be in a position of such power as to be able to defraud humanity or to attempt to manipulate us with their corrupt agendas.
And for this reason, I will now explain to you how and where an international network of lawyers will argue this biggest tort case ever, the corona fraud scandal, which has meanwhile unfolded into probably the greatest crime against humanity ever committed.
Crimes against humanity were first defined in connection with the Nuremberg trials, after World War II that is,
when they dealt with the main war criminals of the Third Reich.
Crimes against humanity are today regulated in Section 7 of the International Criminal Code.
The three major questions to be answered in the context of a judicial approach to the corona scandal are 1.
Is there a corona pandemic or is there only a PCR test pandemic?
Specifically, does a positive PCR test result mean that the person tested with COVID-19 or does it mean absolutely nothing in connection with the COVID-19 infection?
Two, do the so-called anti-Corona measures, such as the lockdown, mandatory face masks,
social distancing, and quarantine regulations serve to protect the world's population from
Corona?
Or do these measures serve only to make people panic so that they believe, without asking
any questions, that their lives are in danger?
so that in the end, the pharmaceutical and tech industries can generate huge profits from the sale
of PCR tests, antigen and antibody tests, and vaccines, as well as the harvesting of our
fingerprints. And three, is it true that the German government was massively lobbied,
more so than any other country?
I've been the chief protagonist of this so-called pro-corona pandemic, Mr. Druston, virologist
at Charité Hospital in Berlin.
Mr. Wheeler, veterinarian and head of the German equivalent of the CDC, the RKI,
and Mr. Tedros, head of the World Health Organization, or WHO,
because of Germany is known as a particularly disciplined country
and was therefore to become a role model for the rest of the world
for its strict and, of course, successful adherence to the corona measures.
Answers to these three questions are urgently needed because the allegedly new and highly dangerous coronavirus has not caused any excess mortality anywhere in the world and certainly not here in Germany.
But the anti-corona measures, whose only basis are the PCR test results, which are in turn
all based on the German Drosten test, have, in the meantime, caused the loss of innumerable
human lives and have destroyed the economic existence of countless companies and individuals
worldwide.
In Australia, for example, people are thrown into prison if they do not wear a mask or
do not wear it properly as deemed by the authorities.
In the Philippines, people who do not wear a mask or do not wear it properly in this
sense are getting shot in the head.
Let me first give you a summary of the facts as they present themselves today.
The most important thing in a lawsuit is to establish the facts.
That is, to find out what actually happened.
That is because the application of the law always depends on the facts at issue.
If I want to prosecute someone for fraud, I cannot do that by presenting the facts of a car accident.
So what happened here regarding the alleged corona pandemic?
The facts laid out below are to a large extent the result of the work of the Corona Investigative Committee.
This committee was founded on July 10th by four lawyers in order to determine through hearing expert testimony of international scientists and other experts.
One, how dangerous is the virus, really?
Two, what is the...
significance of a positive PCR test, three, what collateral damage has been caused by
the corona measures, both with respect to the world's population's health and with respect
to the world's economy?
Let me start with a background, a little bit of background information.
What happened in May 2019 and then in early 2020 and what happened 12 years earlier with
the swine flu, which many of you may have forgotten about?
In May of 2019, the stronger of the two parties which governed Germany in a grand coalition,
the CDU, held a Congress on global health, apparently at the instigation of important
players from the pharmaceutical industry and the tech industry. At this congress,
the usual suspects, you might say, gave their speeches.
Angela Merkel was there and the German Secretary of Health, Jens Spahn, but some other people
whom one would not necessarily expect to be present at such a gathering were also there.
Professor Drosten, virologist from the Charité Hospital in Berlin,
Professor Wheeler, veterinarian and head of the RKI,
the German equivalent of the CDC,
as well as Mr. Tedros, philosopher and head of the World Health Organization, WHO.
They all gave speeches there.
Also present and giving speeches were the chief lobbyists of the world's two largest health funds,
namely the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust.
Less than a year later, these very people caught the shots in the proclamation of the worldwide corona pandemic.
made sure that mass PCR tests were used to prove mass infections with COVID-19 all over
the world, and are now pushing for vaccines to be invented and sold worldwide.
These infections, or rather the positive test results that the PCR tests delivered, in turn
became the justification for worldwide lockdowns, social distancing, and mandatory face masks.
It is important to note at this point that the definition of a pandemic was changed 12 years earlier.
Until then, a pandemic was considered to be a disease that spread worldwide and which led to many serious illnesses and deaths.
Suddenly, and for reasons never explained, it was supposed to be a worldwide disease only.
Many serious illnesses and many deaths were not required anymore to announce a pandemic.
Due to this change, the WHO, which is closely intertwined with the global pharmaceutical
industry, was able to declare the swine flu pandemic in 2009, with the result that vaccines
were produced and sold worldwide on the basis of contracts that have been kept
secret until today. These vaccines proved to be completely unnecessary because the swine
flu eventually turned out to be a mild flu and never became the horrific plague that the
pharmaceutical industry and its affiliated universities kept announcing it would turn
into with millions of deaths certain to happen if people didn't get vaccinated.
These vaccines also led to serious health problems.
About 700 children in Europe fell incurably ill with narcolepsy and are now forever severely disabled.
The vaccines bought with millions of taxpayers' money had to be destroyed with even more taxpayers' money.
Already then, during the swine flu, the German virologist, Drusten, was one of those who
stirred up panic in the population, repeating over and over again that the swine flu would
claim many hundreds of thousands, even millions of deaths all over the world.
In the end, it was mainly thanks to Dr. Wolfgang Wodak and his efforts as a member of the German
Bundestag and also a member of the Council of Europe that this hoax was brought to an
end before it would lead to even more serious consequences.
Fast forward to March of 2020, when the German Bundestag announced an epidemic situation of national importance, which is the German equivalent of a pandemic, in March of 2020, and based on the global pandemic.
on this, the lockdown with the suspension of all essential constitutional rights for
an unforeseeable time, there was only one single opinion on which the federal government
in Germany based its decision.
In an outrageous violation of the universally-accepted principle Audiata at Altaraparz, which means that one must also hear the other side, the only person they listened to was Mr. Drustin.
That is the very person whose horrific, panic-inducing prognoses had proved to be catastrophically false 12 years earlier.
We know this because a whistleblower named David Seba, a member of the Green Party, told us about it.
He did so first on August 29th, 2020, in Berlin,
in the context of an event at which Robert F. Kennedy Jr. also took part and at which both men gave speeches.
And he did so afterwards in one of the sessions of our Corona Committee.
The reason he did this is that he had become increasingly skeptical about the official narrative propagated by politicians and the mainstream media.
He had therefore undertaken an effort to find out about other scientists' opinions and had found them on the internet.
There, you realize that there were a number of highly renowned scientists who held a completely
different opinion, which contradicted the horrific prognoses of Mr. Drustin.
They assumed, and still do assume, that there was no disease that went beyond the gravity
of the seasonal flu, that the population had already acquired cross- or T-cell immunity
against this allegedly new virus, and that there was therefore no reason for any special
measures, and certainly not for vaccinations.
These scientists include Professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University in California, a specialist
in statistics and epidemiology, as well as public health.
and at the same time the most coded scientists in the world.
Professor Michael Levitt, Nobel Prize winner for chemistry
and also a biophysicist at Stanford University,
the German professors Karin Möhling, Susharit Bhakti,
Knut Wittkowski, as well as Stefan Homburg, and now many, many more scientists and doctors worldwide,
including Dr. Mike Gieden.
Dr. Mike Yeaton is the former Vice President and Scientific Director of Pfizer, one of
the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world.
I will talk some more about him a little later.
At the end of March, beginning of April of 2020, Mr. Seabrook turned to the leadership
of his Green Party with the knowledge he had accumulated and suggested that they present
these other scientific opinions to the public and explain that contrary to Mr. Drosden's
doomsday prophecies, there was no reason for the public to panic.
Incidentally.
Lord Sumption, who served as a judge at the British Supreme Court from 2012
2012 to 2018 had done the very same thing at the very same time it had come to the very
same conclusion, that there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for the
corona measures.
Likewise, the former president of the German Federal Constitutional Court expressed, albeit
more cautiously, serious doubts that the corona measures were constitutional.
But, instead of taking note of these other opinions and discussing them with David Siever,
the Green Party leadership declared that Mr. Drosten's panic messages were good enough
for the Green Party.
Remember, they're not a member of the ruling coalition, they're the opposition.
Still, that was enough for them, just as it had been good enough for the federal government
as a basis for its lockdown decision, they said.
They subsequently, the Green Party leadership, called David Sieber a conspiracy theorist
without ever having considered the content of his information and then stripped them
of his mandates.
Now let's take a look at the current actual situation regarding the virus's danger,
the complete uselessness of PCR tests for the detection of infections, and the lockdowns
based on non-existent infections.
In the meantime, we know that the healthcare systems were never in danger of becoming overwhelmed by COVID-19.
On the contrary, many hospitals remain empty to this day and some are now facing bankruptcy.
The hospital shipped comfort, which anchored in New York at the time,
and could have accommodated a thousand patients, never accommodated more than some twenty patients.
Nowhere was there any excess, excess mortality?
Studies carried out by Professor Ioannidis and others have shown that the mortality of corona is equivalent to that of the seasonal flu.
Even the pictures from Bergamo and New York that were used to demonstrate to the world that panic was in order proved to be deliberately misleading.
Then, the so-called panic paper was leaked, which was written by the German Department
of the Interior.
Its classified content shows beyond a shadow of a doubt that, in fact, the population was
deliberately driven to panic by politicians and mainstream media.
The accompanying irresponsible statements of the head of the RKI, remember the CDC, Mr. Wheeler,
who repeatedly and excitedly announced that the corona measures must be followed unconditionally
by the population without them asking any question, shows that he followed the script verbatim.
In his public statements, he kept announcing that the situation was very grave and threatening,
although the figures compiled by his own Institute proved the exact opposite.
Among other things, the panic paper calls for children to be made to feel responsible,
and I quote, for the painful torture deaths of their parents and grandparents,
if they do not follow the corona rules.
That is, if they do not wash their hands constantly and don't stay away from their grandparents.
A word of clarification, in Bergamo, the vast majority of deaths, 94% to be exact, turned
out to be the result not of COVID-19, but rather the consequence of the government deciding
to transfer sick patients, sick was probably the cold or seasonal flu, from hospitals to
nursing homes in order to make room at the hospitals for all the COVID patients who ultimately
never arrived.
There, at the nursing homes, they then infected old people with a severely weakened immune
system, usually as a result of pre-existing medical conditions.
In addition, a flu vaccination, which had previously been administered, had further
weakened the immune systems of the people in the nursing homes.
In New York, only some, but by far not all hospitals, were overwhelmed.
Many people, most of whom were, again, elderly and had serious pre-existing medical conditions and most of whom were,
whom, had it not been for the panic mongering, would have just stayed at home to recover,
raced to the hospitals.
There, many of them fell victim to healthcare-associated infections, or nosocomial infections, on the
one hand, an incidence of malpractice on the other hand, for example, by being put on a
respirator rather than receiving oxygen.
through an oxygen mask. Again, to clarify, COVID-19, this is the current state of affairs,
is a dangerous disease, just like the seasonal flu is a dangerous disease. And of course COVID-19,
just like the seasonal flu, may sometimes take a severe clinical course and will sometimes kill
patients.
However, as autopsies have shown, which were carried out in Germany in particular by the
forensic scientist Professor Klaus Pusha in Hamburg, the fatalities he examined had almost
all been caused by serious pre-existing conditions, and almost all of the people who had died
had died at a very old age, just like in Italy, meaning they had lived beyond their average
life expectancy.
In this context, the following should also be mentioned.
The German RKI, that is, again, the equivalent of the CDC, had initially, strangely enough,
recommended that no autopsies be performed.
And
There are numerous credible reports that doctors and hospitals worldwide had been paid
money for declaring a deceased person a victim of COVID-19 rather than writing down the true
cause of death on the death certificate.
a heart attack or a gunshot wound. Without the autopsies, we would never know that the
overwhelming majority of the alleged COVID-19 victims had died of completely different diseases,
but not of COVID-19.
The assertion that the lockdown was necessary because there were so many different infections
with SARS-CoV-2 and because the healthcare systems would be overwhelmed is wrong for
three reasons, as we have learned from the hearings we conducted with the Corona Committee
and from other data that has become available in the meantime.
A, the lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating.
By the time the lockdown was imposed, the alleged infection.
infection rates were already dropping again. B, there's already protection from the virus
because of cross or T cell immunity. Apart from the above mentioned lockdown being imposed
when the infection rates were already dropping, there's also cross or T cell immunity in the
general population against the corona virus's concern.
contained in every flu or influenza wave.
This is true even if this time around a slightly different strain of a coronavirus was at work.
And that is because the body's own immune system remembers every virus it has ever battled in the past.
And from this experience, it also recognizes it's supposedly new, but still similar.
strain of the virus from the corona family.
Incidentally, that's how the PCR test for the detection of an infection
was invented by now infamous Professor Justin.
At the beginning of January 2020, based on this very basic knowledge, Mr. Justin developed
his PCR test, which supposedly detects an infection with SARS-CoV-2.
Without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China, only having learned from social
media reports that there was something going on in Wuhan, he started tinkering on his
computer with what would become his corona PCR test.
For this, he used an old SARS virus, hoping it would be sufficiently similar to the allegedly
new strain of the coronavirus found in Wuhan.
Then he sent the result of his computer tinkering to China to determine whether the victims of
the alleged new coronavirus tested positive.
They did.
that was enough for the World Health Organization to sound the pandemic alarm
and to recommend the worldwide use of the Drostin PCR test for the detection of
infections with the virus now called SARS-CoV-2. Drostin's opinion and advice was
this must be emphasized once again the only source for the German government
when it announced the lockdown as well as the rules for social distancing and
the mandatory wearing of masks.
And this must also be emphasized once again.
Germany apparently became the center of especially massive lobbying by the pharmaceutical and tech industry
because the world was referenced to the allegedly disciplined Germans should do as the Germans do in order to survive the pandemic.
C. And this is the most important part of our fact finding. The PCR test is being used
on the basis of false statements, not based on scientific facts with respect to infections.
In the meantime, we have learned that these PCR tests, contrary to the assertions of
Messers, Drosten, Wheeler, and the Who, do not give any indication of an infection with
any virus, let alone an infection with SARS-CoV-2.
Note not only are PCR tests expressly not approved on prostate purposes,
as is correctly noted on leaflets coming with these tests,
and as the inventor of the PCR test, Kerry Mullis, has repeatedly emphasized.
Instead, they're simply incapable of diagnosing any disease.
That is, contrary to the assertions of Druss and Wheeler and The Who, which they have been
making since the proclamation of the pandemic, a positive PCR test result does not mean that
an infection is present.
If someone tests positive, it does not mean that they're infected with anything, let
along with a contagious SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Even the United States CDC, even this institution says, agrees with this, and I quote directly
from page 38 of one of its publications on the coronavirus and the PCR tests dated July
13th, 2020.
The first bullet point says, detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of
infectious virus or that 2019 NCOV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.
The second bullet point says, the performance of this test has not been established for
monitoring treatment of 2019 NCOV infection.
Third bullet point says this test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral
pathogens.
It is still not clear whether there has ever been a scientifically correct isolation of
the Wuhan virus so that nobody knows exactly what we're looking for when we test, especially
since this virus, just like the flu viruses, mutates quickly.
The PCR swaps take one or two sequences of a...
molecule that are invisible to the human eye and therefore need to be amplified in many
cycles to make it visible. Everything over 35 cycles is as reported by The New York Times
and others.
considered completely unreliable and scientifically unjustifiable.
However, the Dresden test, as well as the who recommended a test that followed his example, are set to 45 cycles.
Can that be because of the desire to produce as many positive results as possible,
and thereby provide the basis for the false assumption that a large number of infections have been detected?
The test cannot distinguish inactive and reproductive matter.
That means that a positive result may happen because the test detects, for example, a piece of debris,
a fragment of a molecule which may signal nothing else than that the immune system of the person tested one a battle with a common cold in the past.
Even Justin himself declared an injury.
interview with the German Business Magazine in 2014 at that time concerning
the alleged detection of an infection with a nurse virus allegedly with the
help of the PCR test that these PCR tests are so highly sensitive that even
very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive.
At that time, you also became very much aware of the powerful role of the panic and fear-mongering media
as you'll see at the end of the following quote.
He said then, in this interview, if, for example, such a pathogen scurries over the nasal mucosa
of a nurse for a day or so without her getting sick or noticing anything, then she suddenly
immersed case.
This could also explain the explosion of case numbers in Saudi Arabia.
In addition, the media there have made this into an incredible sensation.
Has he forgotten this, or is he deliberately concealing this in the corona context, because corona is a very lucrative business opportunity for the pharmaceutical industry as a whole, and for Mr. Allford Lund, his co-author in many studies and also a PCR test producer.
In my view, it is completely implausible that he forgot in 2020 what he knew about the PCR tests and told a business magazine in 2014.
In short, this test cannot detect any infection.
contrary to all false claims stating that it can.
An infection, a so-called hot infection, requires that the virus,
or rather a fragment of a molecule, which may be a virus,
is not just found somewhere, for example, in the throat of a person without causing any damage.
That would be a cold infection.
Rather, a hot infection requires that the virus penetrates into the cells
replicates there and causes symptoms such as headaches or a sore throat.
Only then is a person really infected in the sense of a hot infection.
Because only then is a person contagious, that is able to infect others.
Until then, it is completely harmless for both the host and all other people
that the host comes into contact with.
Once again, this means that positive test results, contrary to all other claims by
Justin Wheeler or the who, mean nothing with respect to infections as even the CDC knows
as quoted above.
Meanwhile, a number of highly respected scientists worldwide assume that there has never been
a corona pandemic, but only a PCR test pandemic.
This is the conclusion reached by many German scientists such as professors Bakhti, Rice,
Mulling, Hawkeritz, Wallach, and many others, including the above-mentioned professor John
Ioannidis and the Nobel Laureate Professor Michael Lippert from Stanford University.
The most recent such opinion is that of the aforementioned Dr. Mike Gieden, a former Vice
President and Chief Science Officer at Pfizer, who held this position for 16 years.
He and his co-authors, all well-known scientists, published a scientific paper in September
of 2020, and he wrote a corresponding magazine article on September 20, 2020.
Among other things, he and they state," and I quote,
we're basing our government policy, our economic policy,
and the policy of restricting fundamental rights presumably on completely wrong data
and assumptions about the coronavirus.
If it weren't for the test results that are constantly reported in the media,
the pandemic would be over because nothing really happened.
Of course, there are some serious individual cases of illness, but there are also some
in every flu epidemic.
There was a real wave of disease in March and April, but since then, everything has
gone back to normal.
positive results rise and sink wildly again and again depending on how many
tests are carried out. But the real cases of illnesses are over. There can
be no talk of a second wave.
The allegedly new strain of the coronavirus is Dr. Yead and continues only new in that
it is a new type of the long known coronavirus.
There are at least four coronaviruses that are endemic and cause some of the common
colds we experience, especially in winter.
They all have a striking sequence similarity to the coronavirus.
And because the human immune system recognizes the similarity to the virus
that has now allegedly been newly discovered, a T cell immunity has long existed in this respect.
30% of the population had this before the allegedly new virus even appeared.
Therefore, it is sufficient for the so-called herd immunity that 15-25% of the population
are infected with the allegedly new coronavirus to stop the further spread of the virus.
And this has long been the case.
Regarding the all-important PCR tests, Yeiden writes in a piece called Lies,
Demed Lies, and Hell Statistics, the deadly danger of false positives, dated
September 20th, 2020, and I quote, the likelihood of an apparently positive case
being a false positive is between 89 to 94 percent or near certainty.
Dr. Yeiden, an agreement with the professors of immunology camera from Germany, Capell,
from the Netherlands, and Cahill from Ireland, as well as the microbiologist Dr. Arve from
Austria, all of whom testified before the German-Corona Committee, explicitly points
out that a positive test does not mean that an intact virus has been found.
The authors explain that what the PCR test actually measures is, and I quote,
simply the presence of partial RNA sequences present in the intact virus,
which could be a piece of dead virus which cannot make the subject sick and cannot be transmitted
and cannot make anyone else sick.
Because of the complete unsuitability of the test for the detection of infectious diseases tested positive in goats, sheep, papayans and even chicken wings, Oxford professor Carl Hennigan, director of the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, writes that the COVID virus would never disappear if this test practice were to be continued but would always be falsely detected in much of what is tested.
Lockdowns, as Eden and his colleagues found out, do not work.
Sweden, with its, let's say, fair approach, and Great Britain, with a strict lockdown,
for example, have completely comparable disease and mortality statistics.
The same was found by U.S. scientists concerning the different U.S. states.
It makes no difference to the incidence of disease, whether a state implements a lockdown or not.
With regard to the now infamous Imperial College of London's professor Neil Ferguson and his
completely false computer model models warning of millions of deaths, he says that, and I quote,
no serious scientist gives any validity to Ferguson's model.
He points out with thinly veiled contempt, again I quote,
it's important that you know most scientists don't accept that it,
that is, Ferguson's model, was even faintly right,
but the government is still wedded to the model.
Ferguson predicted 40,000 corona deaths in Sweden by May and 100,000 by June, but it
remained at 5,800, which, according to the Swedish authorities, is equivalent to a mild
flu.
If the PCR tests had not been used as a diagnostic tool for corona infections, there would not be a pandemic.
And there would be no lockdowns, but everything would have been perceived as just a medium or light wave of influenza, these scientists conclude.
Dr. Heaton, in his piece lies, damned lies, and health statistics, the deadly danger of
false positives, writes, this test is fatally flogged and must immediately be withdrawn
and never used again in this setting unless shown to be fit.
to be fixed. And towards the end of that article,
I have explained how a hopelessly performing diagnostic test
has been and continues to be used not for diagnosis of disease,
but it seems solely to create fear.
Now, let's take a look at the current actual situation regarding the severe damage caused
by the lockdowns and other measures.
Another detailed paper written by a German official in the Department of the Interior,
who is responsible for risk assessment and the protection of the population against risks,
was leaked recently.
It is now called the False Alarm Paper.
This paper comes to the conclusion that there was and is no sufficient evidence for serious
health risks for the population is claimed by Drosson Wheeler and the who.
But, the author says, there is very much evidence of the corona measures causing gigantic health
and economic damage to the population, which he then describes in detail in this paper.
This he concludes will lead to very high claims for damages which the government will be held
responsible for.
This has now become reality, but the paper's author was suspended.
More and more scientists, but also lawyers, recognize that as a result of the deliberate panic mungering and the corona measures enabled by this panic, democracy is in great danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models.
As I already mentioned above, in Australia, people who do not wear the masks which more and more studies show are hazardous to health.
or who allegedly do not wear them correctly are rested, handcuffed, and thrown into jail.
In the Philippines, they run the risk of getting shot.
But even in Germany and in other previously civilized countries,
children are taken away from their parents if they do not comply with quarantine regulations,
distance regulations, and mask wearing regulations.
According to psychologists and psychotherapists who testified before the
Coronavirus Committee, children are traumatized en masse. With the worst
psychological consequences yet to be expected
in the medium and long term. In Germany alone, 500,000 to 800,000 bankruptcies are expected in the fall
to strike small and medium-sized businesses which form the backbone of the economy.
This will result in incalculable text losses and incalculably high and long-term social
security money transfers for, among other things, unemployment benefits.
Since in the meantime, pretty much everybody is beginning to understand the full, devastating impact of the completely unfounded corona measures,
I will refrain from detailing this any further.
Let me now give you a summary of the legal consequences.
The most difficult part of a lawyer's work is always to establish the true facts, not the
application of the legal rules to these facts. Unfortunately, a German lawyer does not learn
this at law school, but his Anglo-American counterparts do get the necessary training for this at their
law schools. And probably for this reason, but also because of the much more pronounced independence
of the American.
Anglican judiciary. The Anglican law of evidence is much more effective in
practice than the German one.
A court of law can only decide a legal dispute correctly if it has previously
determined the facts correctly, which is not possible without looking at all the evidence.
And that's why the law of evidence is so important.
On the basis of the facts summarized above, in particular those established
with the help of the work of the German corona committee, the legal evaluation is actually simple.
It is simple for all civilized legal systems, regardless of whether these legal systems
are based on civil law, which follows the Roman law more closely, or whether they are
based on Anglo-American common law, which is only loosely connected to Roman law.
Let's first take a look at the unconstitutionality of the measures.
A number of German law professors, including Professors King Rayne, Mosweig, Jungblüt,
and Fuskerau, have stated either in written expert opinions or in interviews, in line
with the serious doubts expressed by
former president of the Federal Constitutional Court with respect to the constitutionality
of the corona measures, that these measures, the corona measures, are without a sufficient
factual basis and also without a sufficient legal basis, and are therefore unconstitutional
and must be repealed immediately.
Very recently, a judge tossed in schleif is his name, declared publicly that the German
judiciary, just like the general public, has been so panic-stricken that it was no longer
able to administer justice properly.
He says that the courts of law, and I quote,
have all too quickly weighed through coercive measures
which for millions of people all over Germany
represent massive suspensions of their constitutional rights.
He points out that German citizens, again, I quote,
are currently experiencing the most serious encroachment
on their constitutional rights
since the founding of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1949.
In order to contain the corona pandemic federal and state governments have intervened he says
massively and in part threatening the very existence of the country as it is guaranteed
by the constitutional rights of the people.
What about fraud and intentional infliction of damage and crimes against humanity?
Based on the rules of criminal law, asserting false facts concerning the PCR tests or intentional misrepresentation
as it was committed by Messers, Drosdan and Wheeler as well as the who can only be assessed as fraud.
Based on the rules of civil tort law, this translates into intentional infliction of damage.
The German professor of civil law, Martin Schwab, supports this finding in public interviews.
In a comprehensive legal opinion of around 180 pages, he has familiarized himself with the subject matter like no other legal scholar has done.
done thus far, and in particular has provided a detailed account of the complete failure
of the mainstream
media to report on the true facts of this so-called pandemic.
Mr. Justin, Wheeler, and Tedros of the WHO all knew, based on their own expertise or
the expertise of their institutions, that the PCR tests cannot provide any information
about infections, but asserted over and over again to the general public that they can,
with their counterparts all over the world's repeating this.
And they all knew and accepted that on the basis of their recommendations, the governments
of the world would decide on lockdowns, the rules for social distancing, and mandatory
wearing of masks.
The latter, representing a very serious health hazard, as more and more independent studies
and expert statements show.
Under the rules of civil tort law, all of those who have been harmed by these PCR tests induced lockdowns are entitled to receive full compensation for their losses.
In particular, there is a duty to compensate that it is a duty to pay damages for the loss of profits suffered by companies and self-employed persons as a result of the lockdown and other measures.
In the meantime, however, the anti-corona measures have caused and continued to cause
such devastating damage to the world's population's health and economy that the crimes committed
by Mr. Justin Wheeler and the WHO must be legally qualified as actual crimes against
humanity as defined in Section 7 of the International Criminal Code.
How can we do something? What can we do?
Well, the class action is the best route to compensatory damages and to political consequences.
The so-called class action lawsuit is based on English law and exists today in the USA and in Canada.
It enables a court of law to allow complaints
for damages to be tried as a class action lawsuit at the request of a plaintiff, if one, as a
result of a damage-inducing event, two, a large number of people suffer the same type of damage.
Phrase differently, a judge can allow a class action lawsuit to go forward if common questions
of law and fact make up the vital component of the lawsuit.
Here, the common questions of law, in fact, revolve around the worldwide PC art test-based
lockdowns and its consequences.
Just like the VW diesel passenger cars were functioning products, but they were defective
effective due to a so-called defeat device, because they didn't comply with the emission standards,
so too the PCR tests which are perfectly good products in other settings
are defective products when it comes to the diagnosis of infections.
Now, if an American or a Canadian company or an American or Canadian individual decides
to sue these persons in the United States or Canada for damages, then the court called
upon to resolve this dispute may, upon request, allow this complaint to be tried as a class
action lawsuit.
If this happens, all affected parties worldwide will be informed about this through publications
in the mainstream media and will thus have the opportunity to join this class action
within a certain period of time to be determined by the court.
It should be emphasized that nobody must join the class action, but every injured party
can join the class.
The advantage of the class action is that only one trial is needed, namely to try the
complaint of a representative plaintiff who is affected in a manner typical of everyone
else in the class.
This is firstly cheaper and secondly faster than hundreds of thousands or more individual
lawsuits and thirdly it imposes less of a burden on the courts.
Fourthly, as a rule, it allows a much more precise examination of the accusations than
would be possible in the context of hundreds of thousands or more likely in this corona
setting, even millions of individual lawsuits.
In particular, the well-established and proven Anglo-American law of evidence with its pre-trial
discovery is applicable.
This requires that all evidence relevant for the determination of the lawsuit is put on
the table.
In contrast to the typical situation in German lawsuits with structural imbalance that is lawsuits involving
on the one hand a consumer, on the one hand a consumer and on the other hand a powerful corporation,
the withholding or even destruction of evidence is not without consequence.
Rather, the party withholding or even destroying evidence loses the case under these evidence
rules.
Here in Germany, a group of tort lawyers have banded together to help their clients with
the recovery of damages.
They have provided all relevant information and forms for German plaintiffs to both estimate
how much damage they have suffered and join the group
or class of plaintiffs who will later join the class action when it goes forward either
in Canada or the U.S.
Initially, this group of lawyers had considered to also collect and manage the claims for damages
of other non-German plaintiffs, but this proved to be unmanageable.
However,
Through an international lawyers network, which is growing larger by the day, the German group
of attorneys provides to all of their colleagues in all other countries, free of charge, all
relevant information, including expert opinions and testimonies of experts showing that the
PCR tests cannot detect infections.
And they also provide them with all relevant information as to how they can prepare and bundle the claims for damages of their clients so that they too can assert their clients' claims for damages either in their home country's courts of law or within the framework of the class action as explained above.
These scandalous corona facts, gathered mostly by the corona committee and summarized above,
are the very same facts that will soon be proven to be true either in one court of law or in many courts of law all over the world.
These are the facts that will pull the masks of the faces of all those responsible for these crimes.
to the politicians who believe those corrupt people.
These facts are hereby offered as a lifeline
that can help you readjust your course of action
and start the long overdue public scientific discussion
and not go down with those charlatans and criminals.
Thank you.