iwirawan
iwirawan
02:56

AI IS IN THE BIBLE: What's Hidden in the Book of Genesis about AI

Is it the same reason she wears purple?

iwirawan
02:33

Mother Miriam has done a complete 180 on the SSPX: "God has established His Church, his universe, everything on obedience, everything on obedience. Children are to obey their parents, not if their parents are holy and right, in everything but sin. Wives are to submit to their husbands, not because they're holy, not because they're right, but because God has given them that position — again, in everything but sin. Religious are to obey their superiors, whether their superior is right or holier than them, or no matter what it is, they are to obey in everything. And Christ's sheep, which is us, every one of us is to obey the successor of Peter, whether we know for sure he is, whether we agree with him, whether we can point out definite heresy. If he's the Pope, then we obey in everything but sin. We don't come against him. So that's where I left it yesterday, and my heart was completely converted."

The reason the Pope reject according to his own words is because SSPX refuse to accept Vatican 2 teaching which deviates from what the Church always taught. To obey him means SSPX have to compromise which is morally wrong. To obey not to consecrate Bishops means to do nothing to preserve the Faith and let all the 2 Bishops die eventually and the Tradition could not be preserved as we know Tradition is being crushed by day by the Pope, which is also morally wrong. Nowadays it seems to be Catholic not need to think, just obey and obey the Pope or else. Nevermind what the Church always taught. Good luck with that.

iwirawan
4 pages

Why the SSPX Has No Time for +Vigano

Looking at what Abp Lefebvre said to Cdl Ratzinger in 1987, do you think there is any chance that he could speak the same tone to Bergoglio? I very much doubt it. My guess is he is rather disappointed to the current SSPX position.

iwirawan

Viganò on Twitter

As far as the laity concern, everything was honky dory with the Church at that time, remember? Maybe there are some sex abuse scandal here and there, but nothing serious, right? Wrong!

iwirawan

Schneider: Heretical Pope Doesn’t Lose Office
There is no authority to declare an elected and generally accepted Pope as invalid, Bishop Athanasius Schneider wrote on RemnantNewspaper.com (September 18).
Even an invalid election would be de facto healed through the acceptance of the overwhelming majority of cardinals and bishops.
A heretical pope would not lose his office automatically. There is no body within the Church to declare him deposed for heresy: “Such actions would come close to a kind of a heresy of conciliarism or episcopalism.”
The theory of the automatic loss of the papacy due to heresy is a mere opinion that theologians such as St Robert Bellarmin noticed, “Never in history the Magisterium of the Church did admit any canonical procedures of deposition of a heretical pope.”
In the case of a heretical pope, the members of the Church can “avoid him, resist him, refuse to obey him.”
The situation of a heretical pope is humanly irresolvable and needs a “Divine intervention.” …

Basically, the Bishop says:
1. If a king is delivering his subjects to the enemy to be devoured, since there is no constitution exist that the subjects allowed to revolt, it is unjust for the subjects to revolt.
2. An apostate Catholic has the authority to lead and teach the Catholic
3. Invalid election is healed by the acceptance of overwhelming majority even the majority was deceived. If the majority realized and start to reject him, it is unjust?
We Catholic expected to uphold justice with courage when we see injustice around us, but we are not even allowed to fight for the injustice done to us?
Sorry, frankly these do not make a lot of sense to me.