All the Assis gatherings are based on ecumenical B.S. whether it be Francis Benedict xvi or JPII hosting it, all based on lies I don't believe any word that was mentioned whenever there was an Assis meeting. To accept any part of the Assis meetings regardless who hosted them is like trying to drink a glass of water without drinking the poison put into it, and in all the Assis meetings the only catholic representative there as the head of the faith, the pope, as all the other religions had their representatives. So one could say that if there were 10 people there representing their faith then only 10% was truthful which in itself is also wrong and a lie because the pope whoever that may have been conducting a religious meeting like that is stating that they all have equal merit, yes even in truth, hence the lie. Therefore the Assis meetings, are lies and nothing but lies, and what is the purpose of lies, if not to sow confusion.

Maybe Francis, has called this one wrong like his called so many other things wrong. Just like JPII called so many things wrong which I doubt would be acceptable in heaven ie; kissing the quran, the ecumenical Assis pray group with schismatic christian and pagans, having ashes put on his forehead, by a pagan priestess; calling for a one world govt "new order" (sounds masonic to me) personally it remains to be seen if he is a saint considering the confusion he has caused, which undoubtedly so many others have followed, because of him. This reminds my of the old saying "Do as I say not as I do" when one takes into the account how he told off one priest for his stance on liberation theology which is bad enough but jpii was supposed to be a learned man very extremly knowledgeable and yet he did all this B.S..

Considering the confusion he has caused, I think I'll pass on calling him a saint. And if he is all the better for him. One thought though, since there is no confusion in Heaven because truth exists in Heaven, will JPII works exist in Heaven also. What about the souls that were lead be his error will they to also be pardoned. I wonder.

P.s good to hear from you again long time no chat.
God bless

"TO CLEAN HOUSE, MEANS "TO CLEAN HOUSE"

Michael Voris doesn't need any defence from me, and I'm also sure that he is not anti Archbishop Marcel Lefebrve if he was he would have spoken against him long ago like when Church Militant started. The reason why Church Militant, is speaking about SSPX now though, is because they who the Traditional Latin Rite people, looked up to have treated Pedo-priests and their victims no diffrently than their novos ordo gay brothers so both groups are only different in name.
And to use Archbishop Marcel Lefebrve's family history as a way to gain sympathy for SSPX is absolutely disingenuous
Since this "crap" occured during Archbishop Bernard Fellay his the one that is responsible not Archbishop Marcel Lefebrve.

And where are the so called "Catholic teachers" of The London St Aloysius College (Westminster Archdiocese) or have they turned tail and run, only to have a stranger, who has know understanding of truth but has more than enough internal fortitude to make up for it, defending what he doesn't know to be true. God Bless you, Joshua Sutcliffe, may God grant you the grace to see the Truth and convert to what is True; The One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Faith. Maybe you will bring back your catholic
colleagues who were fortunate
enough to be baptised in the faith but gave it up

No, the church does not allow happy infighting; erroneous, weak, wicked bishops and past popes alike, allow the happy infighting. Using your arguement one could say that God allowed the "happy infighting" between Abel and Cain there was no church to speak of from what we know but we do know that there was a manner of a ritual where God was worshipped and reverenced. Both Abel and Cain had choices to make in how to worship God. Abel did what was asked Cain did not, is God to blame, ofcoarse not is Abel to blame, again ofcoarse not he did what God asked of him, so in the end Cain is the only one left, he refused to do what was asked and so he killed his brother. Why? possibly because he was jealous, or maybe because he, Cain could not sway his brother Abel to reverence God less as some people have been doing so since the time of Abel and Cain; and so we now have this "happy infighting" as you put it like Abel and Cain we each know in our own hearts how God is best worshipped within our own limited capabilities so to claim a right that has not been granted to all ie; the touching/handling of the Body Blood Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist is one of them

Ofcoarse its a priority, because it is Christ centered rather than centered on a modernist like Fr. Longenecker, or any other priest. It is about how much reverence and respect is owed to the Body Blood Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ. In the end nothing else matters, yes some may say that those that receive The Eucharist on the tongue can be hypocrites. But why not let God decide if thy are or not, in the end we are only responsible for ourselves to get to heaven; that is priority number one, as far as ourselves are concerned. While, trying to get our own house in order, we are to help others without forgetting that we ouselves are not perfect either, since we too may also have been hypocrites, at some stage; and some of us probably still are, maybe not as much as before but its still there. In the end being reverential to Jesus in the Eucharist is the same as building God a Temple as they wanted to do in the Old Testament but it will never be to the grandiosity that God deserves that only exists in heaven and so in other words the reverence that is owed to God will never be attained here on earth it will only be done in heaven; here we can only do our best and let God take care of the rest.