P N F
P N F

Loyal Till Death: Communiqué of the Superiors General of the Ecclesia Dei Communities

1. The Illuminati/Freemasons signal their involvement in things by using symbols and symbolic language.

2. The number 33 is one of the pre-eminent symbols of the Illuminati.

3. This document contains the following statement: "...as evidenced by the numerous studies and doctoral theses submitted by several of us over the last 33 years."

Just a coincidence...I'm sure.
P N F

The Outlook for Cardinal Burke Is Bleak. By Dr Geoffrey Brushwood MD

Unfortunately Cardinal Burke will probably die of pneumonia like most other "covid patients." Because the doctors follow a different protocol to treat "covid," and because the "covid" protocol does not include antibiotics. A "covid patient" will not be treated with the antibiotics that will help him overcome his bacterial pneumonia.

Further, if Cardinal Burke had been treated with the I-MASK …More
Unfortunately Cardinal Burke will probably die of pneumonia like most other "covid patients." Because the doctors follow a different protocol to treat "covid," and because the "covid" protocol does not include antibiotics. A "covid patient" will not be treated with the antibiotics that will help him overcome his bacterial pneumonia.

Further, if Cardinal Burke had been treated with the I-MASK protocol when he first started feeling symptoms, he likely would have avoided the death trap...er...I mean hospital...altogether.

If and when Cardinal Burke dies of untreated pneumonia, please realize that pre-"pandemic" around 50,000 people per year in the USA died of pneumonia (the 9th leading cause of death).

Dr. Brushwood failed to explain that following the I-MASK protocol will prevent and treat "covid." He failed to mention that hospital protocols forbid treating "covid patients" with antibiotics, which would save the lives of these pneumonia patients. I would not trust his advice.
P N F

Anti-Summorum Pontificum: Benedict’s Friends Turn Out to Be His Enemies - Surprised?

Caroline03, I want to say that I agree with you that Quo Primum is inviolable, meaning any priest of the Roman Rite has the permission to use the missal of St. Pope Pius V when saying the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. As Benedict XVI said in Summorum Pontificum, that missal was "never abrogated."

Here's where we disagree. Traditionis Custodes only regulates the "missal of 1962," the missal…More
Caroline03, I want to say that I agree with you that Quo Primum is inviolable, meaning any priest of the Roman Rite has the permission to use the missal of St. Pope Pius V when saying the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. As Benedict XVI said in Summorum Pontificum, that missal was "never abrogated."

Here's where we disagree. Traditionis Custodes only regulates the "missal of 1962," the missal of John XXIII. All of the post-Vatican II regulations related to the Traditional Latin Mass, from John Paul II to Bergoglio, reference "the 1962 missal," exclusively. They do this because they are trying to trick us. They cannot lawfully regulate the missal of St. Pope Pius V because that missal is protected by the dogmatic declaration in Quo Primum.

So, this latest trick by Bergoglio is meant to mislead and divide traditional Catholics. Some will believe (incorrectly) that Bergoglio has restricted "the Latin mass" and those people will deal with the obedience/truth dilemma. But in the case of Traditionis Custodes, there is no dilemma.

Traditional Catholics should simply accept that "the 1962 missal" is restricted/regulated. Who cares? Priests should then be told to use the "pre-1962 missal" (preferably the "pre-1955 missal") when they say mass. There are no legal restrictions on this and there never will be because Quo Primum protects the missal of St. Pope Pius V in perpetuity.

Bishops will probably not go along with this. So laity will possibly need to open their homes for priests to say mass. The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass must be said daily. Viva Cristo Rey!
P N F

Marx Remains Munich Archbishop

Note Bergoglio's reference to Ezechiel 16. The "shameless prostitute" is the "harlot of Babylon" described in Apocalypse 17. This "harlot" or "prostitute" is the apostate "Counterfeit Church" born of the errors of Vatican II, growing like a noxious weed for almost six decades, and now bearing fruit as the German Synodal Way.

Bergoglio wants us to think the problem is clericalism, moral rigidity,…More
Note Bergoglio's reference to Ezechiel 16. The "shameless prostitute" is the "harlot of Babylon" described in Apocalypse 17. This "harlot" or "prostitute" is the apostate "Counterfeit Church" born of the errors of Vatican II, growing like a noxious weed for almost six decades, and now bearing fruit as the German Synodal Way.

Bergoglio wants us to think the problem is clericalism, moral rigidity, and failure to listen to the World. The actual problem is laicism, moral laxity, failure to enforce the perennial Magisterium.

His path perfectly inverts the Truth, and to follow him will lead us down to Hell rather than up to Heaven.
P N F

New Bishop Believes He Is "Prudent"

"He told the diocesan Examiner.org.hk (May 18) that prudence is a “virtue” - but forgot to mention that there are three other cardinal virtues - justice, fortitude, temperance - that must be considered simultaneously."

Yes, but even more important than the cardinal virtues are the theological virtues:

Faith, Hope, and Charity

As with most modernist prelates, Chow ignores the supernatural and …More
"He told the diocesan Examiner.org.hk (May 18) that prudence is a “virtue” - but forgot to mention that there are three other cardinal virtues - justice, fortitude, temperance - that must be considered simultaneously."

Yes, but even more important than the cardinal virtues are the theological virtues:

Faith, Hope, and Charity

As with most modernist prelates, Chow ignores the supernatural and exalts the natural.
P N F

I Invite the Bishops Opposing the Use of Covid Vaccines to Retract. By Josef Seifert

The "fetal cells" used to test and/or grow the vaccines belong to the baby who was aborted. Proof of this is that the DNA in each and every one of those cells matches that innocent, aborted child. Cells divide. Old cells die. New cells are created in the "cell line." But all those cells have the same DNA of the original aborted baby.

The body parts of that baby, including every cell thereof, …More
The "fetal cells" used to test and/or grow the vaccines belong to the baby who was aborted. Proof of this is that the DNA in each and every one of those cells matches that innocent, aborted child. Cells divide. Old cells die. New cells are created in the "cell line." But all those cells have the same DNA of the original aborted baby.

The body parts of that baby, including every cell thereof, should have been buried, as required by perennial Catholic teaching. This did not happen. It needs to happen now. Every Catholic must demand this.

Would Prof. Seifert be okay with digging up dead corpses, if some scientist said tomorrow that ground up bones of those corpses could cure cancer? If so, the man is a heretic.

The aborted baby whose cells are used in the development of the vaccine or any "medicine" must be returned to the earth through burial. We have no right to use that child in our quest for physical longevity.
P N F

Homily: Francis Fights "Doctrines and Dogmas" - But, Of Course, Only the Catholic Ones

From St. Paul in 2 Timothy 4:

1 I charge thee, before God and Jesus Christ, who shall judge the living and the dead, by his coming, and his kingdom: 2 Preach the word: be instant in season, out of season: reprove, entreat, rebuke in all patience and doctrine. 3 For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves…More
From St. Paul in 2 Timothy 4:

1 I charge thee, before God and Jesus Christ, who shall judge the living and the dead, by his coming, and his kingdom: 2 Preach the word: be instant in season, out of season: reprove, entreat, rebuke in all patience and doctrine. 3 For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: 4 And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables. 5 But be thou vigilant, labour in all things, do the work of an evangelist, fulfil thy ministry. Be sober.

Bergoglio is the False Prophet warned about by Jesus in the Olivet Discourse and by St. John in the Apocalypse. Could this not be more clear?

But do not despair. The anti-Church will soon meet its doom. Mary will crush the head fo the serpent. Until then we must be patient and keep the commandments and the precepts of the authentic Catholic Church perfectly.
P N F

Christ the Redeemer Has Found a New Redeemer

From the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

675 Before Christ's second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the "mystery of iniquity" in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth. the …More
From the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

675 Before Christ's second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the "mystery of iniquity" in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth. the supreme religious deception is that of the Antichrist, a pseudo-messianism by which man glorifies himself in place of God and of his Messiah come in the flesh.

676 The Antichrist's deception already begins to take shape in the world every time the claim is made to realize within history that messianic hope which can only be realized beyond history through the eschatological judgement. the Church has rejected even modified forms of this falsification of the kingdom to come under the name of millenarianism, especially the "intrinsically perverse" political form of a secular messianism.

677 The Church will enter the glory of the kingdom only through this final Passover, when she will follow her Lord in his death and Resurrection. The kingdom will be fulfilled, then, not by a historic triumph of the Church through a progressive ascendancy, but only by God's victory over the final unleashing of evil, which will cause his Bride to come down from heaven. God's triumph over the revolt of evil will take the form of the Last Judgement after the final cosmic upheaval of this passing world.

--------------


Believing that "the Vaccine" will save us rather than Jesus Christ is pre-figured in the story of the "Golden Calf." The Israelites put aside the worship of the True God who had saved them from Pharaoh to worship a man-made invention, the "Golden calf."

The word "vaccine" comes from the Latin word "vacca," meaning cow. This invention was named after a cow because the first "vaccine" was made of the "Cowpox" virus as a way to prevent "Smallpox."

Hence, by worshiping "the Vaccine," we are worshiping a "god" in "likeness of a cow."

Those who are faithful to Jesus and Mary know that only God can save us. We cannot save ourselves through our own inventions. There is only one solution, short of a supernatural intervention, for the Catholic who cannot see this: he must examine his conscience and confess his sins to a Catholic priest. Until this happens, he will be deceived no matter what you tell him.
P N F

Liberal Rigorism: PiusX Not Part Of The Church - Cardinal Burke

Cardinal Burke said:

"...they [the SSPX] are not part of the one Roman Catholic Church throughout the world."

If Burke's statement reflects the position of "Pope Francis" (aka Cardinal Bergoglio) then how does Cardinal Burke explain the 2016 Apostolic Letter Misericordia et misera, in which "Pope Francis" states:

"For the Jubilee Year I had also granted that those faithful who, for various …More
Cardinal Burke said:

"...they [the SSPX] are not part of the one Roman Catholic Church throughout the world."

If Burke's statement reflects the position of "Pope Francis" (aka Cardinal Bergoglio) then how does Cardinal Burke explain the 2016 Apostolic Letter Misericordia et misera, in which "Pope Francis" states:

"For the Jubilee Year I had also granted that those faithful who, for various reasons, attend churches officiated by the priests of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X, can validly and licitly receive the sacramental absolution of their sins.[15] For the pastoral benefit of these faithful, and trusting in the good will of their priests to strive with God’s help for the recovery of full communion in the Catholic Church, I have personally decided to extend this faculty beyond the Jubilee Year, until further provisions are made, lest anyone ever be deprived of the sacramental sign of reconciliation through the Church’s pardon."

Here are the facts as "Pope Francis" states them above:

1. He recognizes the clergy of SSPX to be "priests."

2. He recognizes the places where these clergy "officiate" as "churches."

3. He recognizes those "attending" those "churches" to be "faithful."

4. He recognizes the sacramental absolution dispensed by those "priests" to those "faithful" in those "churches" to be "valid" and "licitly received."

So, it would appear that, unlike Cardinal Burke, "Pope Francis" thinks the SSPX are acting as validly ordained Roman Catholic priests with the full "ministry of the Keys." It would, therefore, seem that Cardinal Burke is actually the one who holds "schismatic position, which he defines as one who "accepts the Pope but doesn't accept his governance of the Church," since Burke does not accept the statement by "Pope Francis" concerning the SSPX in Misericordia et misera.

By the way, if "Pope Francis" has given the powers of sacramental absolution to people not part of "the one Roman Catholic Church throughout the world, then that act would be heretical and schismatic because of the following dogma of faith promulgated by the Council of Trent (Denzinger, 43rd edition, 1684 and 1686):

"With regard to the minister of this sacrament [the Sacrament of Absolution], the holy council declares: False and totally foreign to the truth of the Gospel are all doctrines that in a very destructive manner extend the ministry of the keys to any other men besides bishops and priests.
...

It is in the nature and meaning of a judgement that the sentence be pronounced only over one's subjects. Hence, the Church of God has always been convinced, and this council confirms a fully true, that absolution is of no value if it is pronounced by a priest on one over who he has neither ordinary non delegated jurisdiction."


So it would seem that either

a) Cardinal Burke is in a "schismatic position" with "Pope Francis," since "Pope Francis" has recognized the priestly ministry of the SSPX priests,

or that

b) Cardinal Burke is claiming that "Pope Francis" is in violation of a dogma of faith by recognizing allowing non-Catholic "priests" to dispense sacramental absolution.

Take your pick. Either way, it doesn't look good for Cardinal Burke.
P N F

Francis’ Alternative To Deaconesses: Lay-Catechists Instituted By FORMAL RITE

Get ready. The groundwork is now officially laid for the "episcopal conferences" to institute women catechists to proclaim the Gospel and preach the homily, which Canon 767 forbids. This is how Bergoglio gives women one of the functions canonically-reserved for males, priests and deacons, without officially opening the diaconate to women.

From Cardinal Bergoglio, Antiquum Ministerium:

"It is …More
Get ready. The groundwork is now officially laid for the "episcopal conferences" to institute women catechists to proclaim the Gospel and preach the homily, which Canon 767 forbids. This is how Bergoglio gives women one of the functions canonically-reserved for males, priests and deacons, without officially opening the diaconate to women.

From Cardinal Bergoglio, Antiquum Ministerium:

"It is essential that they be faithful co-workers with priests and deacons, prepared to exercise their ministry wherever it may prove necessary, and motivated by true apostolic enthusiasm."

From 1983 Code of Canon Law:

"CHAPTER I : PREACHING THE WORD OF GOD

Can. 766 The laity may be allowed to preach in a church or oratory if in certain circumstances it is necessary, or in particular cases it would be advantageous, according to the provisions of the Episcopal Conference and without prejudice to can. 767 §1.

Can. 767 §1 The most important form of preaching is the homily, which is part of the liturgy, and is reserved to a priest or deacon. In the course of the liturgical year, the mysteries of faith and the rules of christian living are to be expounded in the homily from the sacred text.

From St. Paul, 1 Corinthians 14:

"34 Let women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted them to speak, but to be subject, as also the law saith. 35 But if they would learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is a shame for a woman to speak in the church. 36 Or did the word of God come out from you? Or came it only unto you?"

Sacred Scripture, through the pen of St. Paul, makes clear that because "the word of God" (i.e., the words of Jesus in the Gospels) came out of the mouth of a man (i.e., Jesus) that no woman should dare speak His words during the official liturgy of the Church. In the Parable of the Sower, "the word" is compared to the "seed," as coming from a male and growing in the "earth," a feminine metaphor. To disregard this male-female paradigm is to reject the order created by God and frustrate the end of evangelization within the Mass.
P N F

Italian Daily Doubts Francis' Papacy

1.) You claimed that Benedict said "Some men of the Vatican Gendarmerie and the Swiss Guards are already there to organize all possible protective measures around Pope Francis."

Here is the original Italian text of the sentence you provided along with the sentence before that:

«Purtroppo cade in un momento molto difficile che lo rende anche un viaggio pericoloso: per ragioni di sicurezza e …More
1.) You claimed that Benedict said "Some men of the Vatican Gendarmerie and the Swiss Guards are already there to organize all possible protective measures around Pope Francis."

Here is the original Italian text of the sentence you provided along with the sentence before that:

«Purtroppo cade in un momento molto difficile che lo rende anche un viaggio pericoloso: per ragioni di sicurezza e per il Covid. E poi c’è la situazione irachena instabile. Accompagnerò Francesco con la mia preghiera». Alcuni uomini della Gendarmeria vaticana e delle guardie svizzere sono già lì per organizzare tutte le possibili misure di protezione intorno a papa Francesco.

Here is that same two sentence text in English translation (Google translate):

"Unfortunately, it falls at a very difficult moment that also makes it a dangerous trip: for security reasons and for Covid. And then there is the unstable Iraqi situation. I will accompany Francis with my prayer". Some men of the Vatican Gendarmerie and the Swiss Guards are already there to organize all possible protective measures around Pope Francis.

Note that the quote marks in the original Italian text end after the word "preghiera" ("prayer"), which is the last word in the first sentence. The sentence that you claimed was from Benedict was not inside the quote marks (in italian quotes look like this: « or »).

So, as I said before, the quote you provided to make your point was a quote from the journalist, not from Pope Benedict.

2.) You have used the article by Tornielli as your "evidence" that Benedict used the title "Pope Francis." According to Tornielli, the use of the words "Pope Francis" was found in a letter that Benedict supposedly sent to Hans Kung. This Benedict-Kung letter has never been revealed publicly. Tornielli has refused to provide documentary evidence of the "letter" to prove that Pope Benedict actually used that title in that letter. You assume that Tornielli has told the truth. I do not make that assumption. Remember what they say about those who ass/u/me.

3.) Now to your specific questions:

a.) Here again you ass/u/me that the quotes attributed to Benedict can be trusted without any evidence.

b.) Here again you ass/u/me that the quote attributed to Benedict can be trusted without any evidence. Although, I am not proposing "diarchy" anyway. I am saying that Benedict is "Peter," and retains the spiritual authority of the papacy as dogmatically defined by Pastor Aeternus at Vatican I. Bergoglio is something like Benedict's prime minister, carrying out the daily duties of government as Bishop of Rome.

c.) You are welcome to your opinion as to whether the various meanings of the word "Pope" apply in this case. I stated my opinion.

d.) The fact that Bergoglio specifically rejected certain titles from his entry in the Vatican Yearbook, most importantly "the successor of Peter, Prince of the Apostles" and "Vicar of Christ," should make clear that Bergoglio's status is "unique," to say the least.

4.) Here is how the Vatican I document Pastor Aeternus defines the Papacy:

1. And so, supported by the clear witness of Holy Scripture, and adhering to the manifest and explicit decrees both of our predecessors the Roman Pontiffs and of general councils, we promulgate anew the definition of the ecumenical Council of Florence,[49] which must be believed by all faithful Christians, namely that the Apostolic See and the Roman Pontiff hold a world-wide primacy, and that the Roman Pontiff is the successor of blessed Peter, the Prince of the Apostles, true Vicar of Christ, head of the whole Church and father and teacher of all Christian people.

To him, in blessed Peter, full power has been given by Our Lord Jesus Christ to tend, rule and govern the universal Church.

The 2020 Vatican Yearbook specifically says that the underlined words above DO NOT apply to Jorge Bergoglio. So by Bergoglio's own admission, he not "the successor of blessed Peter," etc.

Note also that this identity as the "successor of blessed Peter" is not some optional title that can be dropped by a future "Pope," but is rather a "definition" "promulgated" at "the ecumenical Council of Florence" and confirmed at the ecumenical Council of Vatican I.

This I am certain about: Benedict XVI did not renounce the munus [spiritual gift] of the Papacy as required by the Canon Law of 1983. He did or attempted to resign from the ministerium [the daily activities of governance] of the papacy. Regardless, Benedict remains "the successor of blessed Peter" and "Vicar of Christ," until he abdicates using that proper canonical form.

Some may ask, why should we care about this? Isn't this just an academic, legalistic concern? No, the teaching on Papal Infallibility (as delimited in the document Pastor Aeternus) is a dogma of the faith, meaning you are not Catholic if you reject it. Here is a syllogism combining what Pastor Aeternus teaches and Bergoglio's actions:

The "successor of Peter" cannot undermine the authentic, traditional Magisterium (de fide). Bergoglio is undermining the authentic, traditional Magisterium. Therefore, Bergoglio is not the "successor of Peter."

Since Bergoglio is not "Peter," Catholics must look for the true Peter and follow him. The true "successor of Peter" is Pope Benedict XVI.
P N F

Italian Daily Doubts Francis' Papacy

Ultraviolet, you must read and research more carefully the sources you quote. Note the following:

1. In the 2021 interview, you quote Benedict as saying "Some men of the Vatican Gendarmerie and the Swiss Guards are already there to organize all possible protective measures around Pope Francis." But that quoted statement was not a quote from Benedict but, instead, background material provided by …More
Ultraviolet, you must read and research more carefully the sources you quote. Note the following:

1. In the 2021 interview, you quote Benedict as saying "Some men of the Vatican Gendarmerie and the Swiss Guards are already there to organize all possible protective measures around Pope Francis." But that quoted statement was not a quote from Benedict but, instead, background material provided by the journalist writing the article.

2. Your other quotes are from an article referring to a mysterious letter, supposedly written by Benedict to a journalist named Andrea Tornielli in 2014. Tornielli claimed in his article that Benedict's letter referred to Bergoglio as "Pope Francis." This Tornielli article caused quite a stir. To return the favor, in 2018, Bergoglio appointed Tornielli to be the Vatican's new propaganda chief. Tornielli has never produced the letter that he claims to have received from Benedict, even though he has been asked publicly to do so as recently as March 2021. Anything Andrea Tornielli has said about Benedict must be backed up by proof before one should be believe him.

So your entire argument rests on a misquote and the testimony of a journalist who is now the propaganda henchman of Bergoglio. Maybe you should try again?
P N F

Italian Daily Doubts Francis' Papacy

The word "Pope" can be thought of in two ways: 1) The successor of Peter and 2) the Bishop of Rome. These are not necessarily identical attributes according to Church history. St. Peter, while head of the early Church, was first Bishop of Antioch. Only later did he transfer his Bishopric to Rome. After that, all "Successors of Peter" where also "Bishops of Rome." But St. Peter's precedent means …More
The word "Pope" can be thought of in two ways: 1) The successor of Peter and 2) the Bishop of Rome. These are not necessarily identical attributes according to Church history. St. Peter, while head of the early Church, was first Bishop of Antioch. Only later did he transfer his Bishopric to Rome. After that, all "Successors of Peter" where also "Bishops of Rome." But St. Peter's precedent means that the two things must necessarily coincide.

The "Pope" traditionally has two functions: 1) he, as Vicar of Christ, embodies the Gift [munus] of the Holy Spirit that guides the Universal Church (this is discussed in Pastor Aeternus) and 2) he, as Bishop of Rome (traditionally), governs the Diocese of Rome.

Pope Benedict XVI, through his Declaratio, has split these two elements of the traditional papacy. But note that he says over and over again, "the Pope is one," never saying who is Pope. It is a riddle left for us to resolve.

Here is the resolution. Benedict XVI is the one and only "Vicar of Christ" guiding the Universal Church. All of the dogmatic powers assigned to the Pope over "faith and morals" in Pastor Aeternus, the document defining papal infallibility at Vatican I, resides in Benedict XVI because he retains the munus, the gift of the Holy Spirit, which comes with the ontological change that takes place when a person accepts the supernatural burden of the papacy.

Bergoglio is merely the "Bishop of Rome." This fact is acknowledged in the Vatican Yearbook, where Bergoglio has renounced the title of "Vicar of Christ" but retains the title "Bishop of Rome." Bergoglio's power extends to his diocese alone, that is, to Rome. The fact that he has gone beyond that and acted as if he governs the Universal Church is a usurpation.

This will all be sorted out in the near future. The most important things you can do is examine your conscience using the most strict, pre-Vatican II guide possible, confess all your sins, receive holy communion (preferably at the Tridentine mass) and pray the Rosary daily. After doing these things, you should be able to recognize the authentic Magisterium and see that Bergoglio is a false prophet.
P N F

Papal Preacher Rants Against "Traditionalism" (Video)

Or we could go with St. Paul instead:

"Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle." (2 Thessalonians 2:15)
P N F

New Religion? Francis Has The Same "Father In Faith" As the Moslems

Listen to this video. Bergoglio nowhere counsels the wayward followers of false "religions" present at this event to convert to the true faith, Roman Catholicism. He speaks of "God," "The Most High," "the Almighty," and "our father Abraham" many times. He never mentions the name of Jesus Christ. Is this not apostasy, a falling away from the authentic Catholic faith? Is this not a new ecumenical,…More
Listen to this video. Bergoglio nowhere counsels the wayward followers of false "religions" present at this event to convert to the true faith, Roman Catholicism. He speaks of "God," "The Most High," "the Almighty," and "our father Abraham" many times. He never mentions the name of Jesus Christ. Is this not apostasy, a falling away from the authentic Catholic faith? Is this not a new ecumenical, Abrahamic Religion of human brotherhood?

In response to Bergoglio's "Abrahamic Religion", Jesus would say what he said to the deniers of His divinity in the Gospel of John, chapter 8 and their response shows us what we, the Mystical Body of Christ, should expect when we speak the Truth:

"58 Jesus said to them: Amen, amen I say to you, before Abraham was made, I am. 59 They took up stones therefore to cast at him. But Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple."

At around 44:30 in this video, Bergoglio says, "We are called to leave behind those ties and attachments that, by keeping us enclosed in our own groups, prevent us from welcoming God's boundless love and from seeing others as our brothers and sisters. Like Abraham, we need to move beyond ourselves because we need each other. The pandemic has made us realize that no one is saved alone."

Do not be fooled. Only Jesus Christ is our savior, not our Abrahamic "brothers and sisters". And our salvation depends only on Him, and He, the omnipotent Holy Trinity, can save us alone.

St. John has specifically warned us about those who deny that Jesus is the one and only Christ [the Messiah]. Those deniers of Jesus are called by St. John, "antichrists." In fact, by denying "the Son," these "antichrists" do not have the same "Father" as authentic Christians. Only those who acknowledge the Sacred Propitiation of Jesus on the Holy Cross and keep His Commandments are truly "brothers in Christ" and are of the true "Father." There is no other Way.

From the First Letter of John, chapter 2:

"18 Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that Antichrist cometh, even now there are become many Antichrists: whereby we know that it is the last hour. 19 They went out from us, but they were not of us. For if they had been of us, they would no doubt have remained with us; but that they may be manifest, that they are not all of us. 20 But you have the unction from the Holy One, and know all things. 21 I have not written to you as to them that know not the truth, but as to them that know it: and that no lie is of the truth. 22 Who is a liar, but he who denieth that Jesus is the Christ? This is Antichrist, who denieth the Father, and the Son. 23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father. He that confesseth the Son, hath the Father also. 24 As for you, let that which you have heard from the beginning [traditional Catholic teaching], abide in you. If that abide in you, which you have heard from the beginning, you also shall abide in the Son, and in the Father."

So to the extent that any Jew, Muslim, Pagan or putative "Christian" "denies" that Jesus is the one and only Messiah and eternally-begotten Son of God, he is, according to St. John, a "liar and an "antichrist." We can never speak of a "brotherhood" or "fraternity" with "liars" and "antichrists." We must patiently but insistently show these confused souls authentic charity by insisting that they convert immediately to the traditional Catholic faith for the good of their eternal souls, even if in performing this charity we have "stones cast at us." There is no other Way that is pleasing to Jesus.