Gloria.TV News on the 26th of August 2016 Gratitude: The former Benedict XVI will soon publish a new interview-book called, “Last Conversations.” In the interview he says about his relationship with …More
Gloria.TV News on the 26th of August 2016
Gratitude: The former Benedict XVI will soon publish a new interview-book called, “Last Conversations.” In the interview he says about his relationship with Pope Francis, "Obedience to my successor has never been in question. But there is also a feeling of profound communion and friendship”; and, “When he was elected, I felt, like many others, a spontaneous gratitude to Divine Providence.”
Too Clear: The Civiltà Cattolica has published Pope Francis’ conversation during a private encounter with Polish Jesuits in Krakow. Among other things, Francis complained about some priestly formation programs which, according to him – quote – “run the risk of educating in the light of overly clear and distinct ideas.” Mother Gloria wonders where Francis encountered such programs in a time of widespread confusion and derangement among popes, bishops, priests and seminarians.
Too Central: Cardinal Sarah, the Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship, has …More
Gratitude: The former Benedict XVI will soon publish a new interview-book called, “Last Conversations.” In the interview he says about his relationship with Pope Francis, "Obedience to my successor has never been in question. But there is also a feeling of profound communion and friendship”; and, “When he was elected, I felt, like many others, a spontaneous gratitude to Divine Providence.”
Too Clear: The Civiltà Cattolica has published Pope Francis’ conversation during a private encounter with Polish Jesuits in Krakow. Among other things, Francis complained about some priestly formation programs which, according to him – quote – “run the risk of educating in the light of overly clear and distinct ideas.” Mother Gloria wonders where Francis encountered such programs in a time of widespread confusion and derangement among popes, bishops, priests and seminarians.
Too Central: Cardinal Sarah, the Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship, has …More
>>>The Bible makes it clear that God’s work in predestination and election is loving (Eph. 1:4-5; 1 John 4:7), wise (Rom. 11:33; 16:27), and just (Gen. 18:25; Rom. 3:4-6). “The Lord is just in all his actions, and exhibits love in all he does” (Ps. 145:17).
In some inexplicable way God has seen fit to incorporate human freedom and responsibility into His all-inclusive plan. Even though the Lord …More
>>>The Bible makes it clear that God’s work in predestination and election is loving (Eph. 1:4-5; 1 John 4:7), wise (Rom. 11:33; 16:27), and just (Gen. 18:25; Rom. 3:4-6). “The Lord is just in all his actions, and exhibits love in all he does” (Ps. 145:17).
In some inexplicable way God has seen fit to incorporate human freedom and responsibility into His all-inclusive plan. Even though the Lord is in sovereign control of the details in His creation, He never forces any man to do anything against his will. The fact that He judges sin means that He is not responsible for the commission of the sins He judges. When a person sins it is because he has freely chosen to do so. Similarly, when someone is confronted with the terms of the gospel, he can freely choose to accept or reject Christ’s offer of forgiveness of sins. Because it is free choice, he will be held responsible for the decision he makes (see John 12:48)...
bible.org/article/divine-sovereig…
"There is a Judge for the one who rejects Me and does not receive My words: The word that I have spoken will judge him on the last day." John 12,48
Article 21
(3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.
www.un.org/…/index.html
In some inexplicable way God has seen fit to incorporate human freedom and responsibility into His all-inclusive plan. Even though the Lord is in sovereign control of the details in His creation, He never forces any man to do anything against his will. The fact that He judges sin means that He is not responsible for the commission of the sins He judges. When a person sins it is because he has freely chosen to do so. Similarly, when someone is confronted with the terms of the gospel, he can freely choose to accept or reject Christ’s offer of forgiveness of sins. Because it is free choice, he will be held responsible for the decision he makes (see John 12:48)...
bible.org/article/divine-sovereig…
"There is a Judge for the one who rejects Me and does not receive My words: The word that I have spoken will judge him on the last day." John 12,48
Article 21
(3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.
www.un.org/…/index.html
Lionel L. Andrades
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
AMONG THEM WILL BE CARDINAL SARAH
This Advent when priests will choose to offer Holy Mass facing the East, they will be do so with manifest heresy, created by interpreting magisterial documents with an irrational premise to reach an irrational conclusion:among them will be Cardinal Sarah
Cardinal Sarah offers Holy Mass with a theology which is a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors.In this manner …More
AMONG THEM WILL BE CARDINAL SARAH
This Advent when priests will choose to offer Holy Mass facing the East, they will be do so with manifest heresy, created by interpreting magisterial documents with an irrational premise to reach an irrational conclusion:among them will be Cardinal Sarah
Cardinal Sarah offers Holy Mass with a theology which is a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors.In this manner he will offer Holy Mass this Advent.Since for him extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) is Cushingite.So is Vatican Council II.They are explicit exceptions to the Syllabus of Errors on other religions and Christian communities.
The concept of salvation in the Syllabus of Errors is rejected by him.
He offers Holy Mass Ad Orientem, rejecting the Syllabus of Errors which was based on the old ecclesiology of EENS (Feeneyite).1
This error cannot be pointed out to him by Bishop Fellay,the liberal cardinals or Fr. John Zuhlsdorfsince they also affirm EENS, Vatican Council II and the Nicene Creed, Cushingite. For all of them hypothetical references are not hypothetical but objectively visible to be relevant and an exception to EENS ( Feeneyite).
So this Advent when some priests will choose to offer Holy Mass facing the East, they will be doing so with manifest heresy.It will be created by interpreting magisterial documents with an irrational premise.In this way they will reach an irrational conclusion.
I affirm EENS, Vatican Council II,the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Nicene Creed with Feeneyism and would invite Cardinal Sarah and the whole Church to do the same. Since it is rational, traditional and non heretical.
There would also be no theological exceptions to the traditional teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State.
There would also be no theological exceptions to the Scriptural teachings in John 3:5( the necessity of baptism) and Mark 16:16( those who do not believe will be condemned).-Lionel Andrades
1.
Cardinal Sarah offers Mass Ad Orientem interprets Vatican Council II with a new premise which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.It supports a 'new faith' in the Catholic Church eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/cardinal-sarah-…
This Advent when priests will choose to offer Holy Mass facing the East, they will be do so with manifest heresy, created by interpreting magisterial documents with an irrational premise to reach an irrational conclusion:among them will be Cardinal Sarah
Cardinal Sarah offers Holy Mass with a theology which is a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors.In this manner he will offer Holy Mass this Advent.Since for him extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) is Cushingite.So is Vatican Council II.They are explicit exceptions to the Syllabus of Errors on other religions and Christian communities.
The concept of salvation in the Syllabus of Errors is rejected by him.
He offers Holy Mass Ad Orientem, rejecting the Syllabus of Errors which was based on the old ecclesiology of EENS (Feeneyite).1
This error cannot be pointed out to him by Bishop Fellay,the liberal cardinals or Fr. John Zuhlsdorfsince they also affirm EENS, Vatican Council II and the Nicene Creed, Cushingite. For all of them hypothetical references are not hypothetical but objectively visible to be relevant and an exception to EENS ( Feeneyite).
So this Advent when some priests will choose to offer Holy Mass facing the East, they will be doing so with manifest heresy.It will be created by interpreting magisterial documents with an irrational premise.In this way they will reach an irrational conclusion.
I affirm EENS, Vatican Council II,the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Nicene Creed with Feeneyism and would invite Cardinal Sarah and the whole Church to do the same. Since it is rational, traditional and non heretical.
There would also be no theological exceptions to the traditional teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State.
There would also be no theological exceptions to the Scriptural teachings in John 3:5( the necessity of baptism) and Mark 16:16( those who do not believe will be condemned).-Lionel Andrades
1.
Cardinal Sarah offers Mass Ad Orientem interprets Vatican Council II with a new premise which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.It supports a 'new faith' in the Catholic Church eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/cardinal-sarah-…
Lionel L. Andrades
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
CARDINAL RATZINGERS DOCTRINAL AND THEOLOGICAL MISTAKE
Since they assumed that Pope Pius XII was correct and Fr.Leonard Feeney wrong Cardinal Ratzinger used an irrational inference in magisterial documents.
Similar to Dominus Iesus and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Cardinal Ratzinger used an irrational inference in Ut Unum Sin
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/similar-to-domi…
Since they …More
CARDINAL RATZINGERS DOCTRINAL AND THEOLOGICAL MISTAKE
Since they assumed that Pope Pius XII was correct and Fr.Leonard Feeney wrong Cardinal Ratzinger used an irrational inference in magisterial documents.
Similar to Dominus Iesus and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Cardinal Ratzinger used an irrational inference in Ut Unum Sin
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/similar-to-domi…
Since they have assumed that Pope Pius XII was correct and Fr.Leonard Feeney wrong the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the SSPX have to interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational inference.
Franciscans of the Immaculate, SSPX note : Cardinal Ratzinger used an irrational inference in the interpretation of Dominus Iesus
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/franciscans-of-…
Basically they are asking all of us Catholics to accept that there is visible salvation outside the Church and so Fr.Leonard Feeney was wrong.
Basically , they are asking you, to accept that there is salvation outside the visible limits of the Church
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/similar-to-domi…
They want you as a Catholic to accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 with an irrational inference and then interpret Vatican Council II also with that same irrational premise.
Letter of the Holy Office '49 with the irrational inference is rejected : Vatican Council II without the false premise is accepted
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/letter-of-holy-…
-Lionel Andrades
__________________________________________
No one denies that the pope has made a Cushingite error
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/letter-of-holy-…
Mons.Lorenzo Leucci anniversary
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/monslorenzo-leu…
Pope John Paul II made a doctrinal error
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/pope-john-paul-…
Since they assumed that Pope Pius XII was correct and Fr.Leonard Feeney wrong Cardinal Ratzinger used an irrational inference in magisterial documents.
Similar to Dominus Iesus and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Cardinal Ratzinger used an irrational inference in Ut Unum Sin
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/similar-to-domi…
Since they have assumed that Pope Pius XII was correct and Fr.Leonard Feeney wrong the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the SSPX have to interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational inference.
Franciscans of the Immaculate, SSPX note : Cardinal Ratzinger used an irrational inference in the interpretation of Dominus Iesus
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/franciscans-of-…
Basically they are asking all of us Catholics to accept that there is visible salvation outside the Church and so Fr.Leonard Feeney was wrong.
Basically , they are asking you, to accept that there is salvation outside the visible limits of the Church
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/similar-to-domi…
They want you as a Catholic to accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 with an irrational inference and then interpret Vatican Council II also with that same irrational premise.
Letter of the Holy Office '49 with the irrational inference is rejected : Vatican Council II without the false premise is accepted
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/letter-of-holy-…
-Lionel Andrades
__________________________________________
No one denies that the pope has made a Cushingite error
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/letter-of-holy-…
Mons.Lorenzo Leucci anniversary
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/monslorenzo-leu…
Pope John Paul II made a doctrinal error
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/pope-john-paul-…
"Obedience to my successor has never been in question..."
How can those who obey humans more than God speak of God's providence?!
There are no differences in the mindset between 'Benedict XVI.' and 'Francis',
otherwise he would have criticized his statements and actions that contradict the Word of God and the Apostolic tradition.
There is also no talk in their speeches about the Truth and the Ten …More
"Obedience to my successor has never been in question..."
How can those who obey humans more than God speak of God's providence?!
There are no differences in the mindset between 'Benedict XVI.' and 'Francis',
otherwise he would have criticized his statements and actions that contradict the Word of God and the Apostolic tradition.
There is also no talk in their speeches about the Truth and the Ten Commandments of God, but only about ´human rights´:
www.americancatholic.org/…/PapalTrip041808…
+
rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/…/who-needs-consp…
+
>>>Pope Benedict XVI noted that the concept of “truth” de facto “has moved into the zone of anti-democratic intolerance.” The implications are profound, for the “public good” is reduced to a private matter and the identification of the good of some groups is “not the truth of society as a whole.”Even though the modern democratic society is wedded to a relativism that guarantees freedom (especially religious freedom), a significant question must yet be posed: “Must there not be a nonrelativistic kernel in democracy too?” After all, democracy has the responsibility to uphold the inviolable human rights of its citizens, rights that constitute “the very substance of tolerance and freedom.” In a word, ethical truth must be integral to democratic life...
Rather, if a state is to enjoy viability and good order, there must exist “a minimum of truth, of knowledge of the good, that cannot be manipulated.” In this regard, a political community without a foundation of substantive truth at its core would be defined on purely functional terms, “not on the basis of that justice which is good for everyone.”
...
On April 15, 2008, Pope Benedict XVI addressed the U.N. General Assembly in the year that marked the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. His address, “Human Rights … Must Be Respected as an Expression of Justice,” posits human dignity as the bedrock moral foundation of the Universal Declaration...
In continuity with his predecessors, Popes John XXIII, Paul VI and John Paul II, Pope Benedict XVI anchored the universality, the indivisibility and interdependence of human rights on the foundation of “the natural law inscribed on human hearts and present in different cultures and civilization.”
ccky.org/…/pope-benedict-x…
How can those who obey humans more than God speak of God's providence?!
There are no differences in the mindset between 'Benedict XVI.' and 'Francis',
otherwise he would have criticized his statements and actions that contradict the Word of God and the Apostolic tradition.
There is also no talk in their speeches about the Truth and the Ten Commandments of God, but only about ´human rights´:
www.americancatholic.org/…/PapalTrip041808…
+
rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/…/who-needs-consp…
+
>>>Pope Benedict XVI noted that the concept of “truth” de facto “has moved into the zone of anti-democratic intolerance.” The implications are profound, for the “public good” is reduced to a private matter and the identification of the good of some groups is “not the truth of society as a whole.”Even though the modern democratic society is wedded to a relativism that guarantees freedom (especially religious freedom), a significant question must yet be posed: “Must there not be a nonrelativistic kernel in democracy too?” After all, democracy has the responsibility to uphold the inviolable human rights of its citizens, rights that constitute “the very substance of tolerance and freedom.” In a word, ethical truth must be integral to democratic life...
Rather, if a state is to enjoy viability and good order, there must exist “a minimum of truth, of knowledge of the good, that cannot be manipulated.” In this regard, a political community without a foundation of substantive truth at its core would be defined on purely functional terms, “not on the basis of that justice which is good for everyone.”
...
On April 15, 2008, Pope Benedict XVI addressed the U.N. General Assembly in the year that marked the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. His address, “Human Rights … Must Be Respected as an Expression of Justice,” posits human dignity as the bedrock moral foundation of the Universal Declaration...
In continuity with his predecessors, Popes John XXIII, Paul VI and John Paul II, Pope Benedict XVI anchored the universality, the indivisibility and interdependence of human rights on the foundation of “the natural law inscribed on human hearts and present in different cultures and civilization.”
ccky.org/…/pope-benedict-x…
VOICEOFTHESHEEP
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Thank you pope Benedict, it is true, Divine Providence has given us something: a Destroyer, true, it is the will of Almighty Father for us having rejected the truth in the traditions of old, even if you don't want to be our pope, I don't care, you still my pope, poison incarnate has sat in St Peter's chair and I will resist... the higher the mess, the more rapidly our Lord will come, the only sad …More
Thank you pope Benedict, it is true, Divine Providence has given us something: a Destroyer, true, it is the will of Almighty Father for us having rejected the truth in the traditions of old, even if you don't want to be our pope, I don't care, you still my pope, poison incarnate has sat in St Peter's chair and I will resist... the higher the mess, the more rapidly our Lord will come, the only sad part is the loss of gazillions of souls by Bergoglio.