Clicks7.5K

Gloria.TV News on the 6th of December 2016

Gloria.TV News
36
Religion-free Religion: “We already knew that Francis Bergoglio generally doesn’t much like the religious part of religion” – writes the journalist Hilary White on her blog. She adds: “More and more …More
Religion-free Religion: “We already knew that Francis Bergoglio generally doesn’t much like the religious part of religion” – writes the journalist Hilary White on her blog. She adds: “More and more people are waking up to the self-evident fact that Bergoglio simply isn’t a Catholic, and that he wants to place himself as the head of an entirely new religion-free religion.”

Vespers for Creation: Hilary White gives an example: Francis abolished the First Vespers of Advent sung by the Pope. Instead, he imposed to the whole Church the obligation of the celebration of Vespers for Creation of September 1, over which he himself presides in Saint Peter’s.

Francis further abolished the public papal Mass for the Assumption, the Eucharistic Adoration with the Pope during papal visits or World Youth Day and religious meetings in St. Peter’s Square, the greeting of the Blessed Sacrament during his visits to churches, and the presence of the Pope at the public Procession of Corpus Christi in Rome.

The Poor: Philip North, the Anglican Bishop of Burnley, England, has accused the Church of England of being run by elites who do not stand up for the family, are embarrassed by patriotism and fail to understand the simple and poor people who have voted for Brexit. North voiced his criticism in a Church Times article. Quote: “The Church's agenda is being set not by the poor, but by academics, the moneyed elites, and certain sections of the secular media,” and: “We listen to the poor on condition that what they say backs up our own pre-conceived arguments.”
michael f shares this.
A
Torkay
I would be very careful about quoting any claim by Hilary White, since (a) she has stepped into the shallow end of the sedevacantist sewer, (b) since she has recently published an article putting false words in Cardinal Zen's mouth - and now, regarding the first claim she makes, which you quote, about "abolishing First Vespers of Advent sung by the Pope," I suggest you Google that to confirm it. …More
I would be very careful about quoting any claim by Hilary White, since (a) she has stepped into the shallow end of the sedevacantist sewer, (b) since she has recently published an article putting false words in Cardinal Zen's mouth - and now, regarding the first claim she makes, which you quote, about "abolishing First Vespers of Advent sung by the Pope," I suggest you Google that to confirm it. I just did, and the results were a grand total of zero. As far as I am concerned, she is a dishonest yellow journalist to be shunned. And by the way, who is she to decide that Pope Francis isn't Catholic? Clearly, he thinks he is a Catholic, even though he certainly sounds more like a Marxist.
ndhorner likes this.
apvs
Que notre bon François prenne un peu patience : d'ici deux ans, en 2019, il aura l'immense honneur de pouvoir fêter en grande pompe les 230 ans de la "révolution française", si ça lui chante !! Et pourquoi pas, au fond ? "Liberté, égalité, fraternité" !
perceval2507 and one more user like this.
perceval2507 likes this.
Roy-XXIII likes this.
ľubica likes this.
December 7, 2016

Pope continues with heretical statements : reinterprets the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with an irrationality

Pope Francis has subtly criticised the Great Commission of Jesus.He has done it befor too. He now mentioned it with reference to ISIS.
Recently he again discouraged an ecumenism in which Orthodox Christians would have to convert into the Catholic Church.

For me …More
December 7, 2016

Pope continues with heretical statements : reinterprets the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with an irrationality

Pope Francis has subtly criticised the Great Commission of Jesus.He has done it befor too. He now mentioned it with reference to ISIS.
Recently he again discouraged an ecumenism in which Orthodox Christians would have to convert into the Catholic Church.

For me this is a direct attack and negation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was know in the 16th century.The pope does not say follow your conscience and affirm the rigorist interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as did the 16th century missionaries.
However he does suggest that a person in manifest mortal sin could follow his conscience and receive the Eucharist etc.

His statement is continued-heresy. It is a contradiction of the dogma extra ecclesiam nullas salus, as I interpret it as a Catholic.
Pope Francis and Pope Benedict do not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus like the Jesuit Fr. Leonard Feeney.I do.
MY THESIS
If the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance which is mentioned in some catechisms, in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and in Vatican Council II refers to invisible cases(since they are physically invisible) then it is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So Vatican Council II would then not be a rupture with this dogma. Neither would it contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX or Tradition in general.
However if the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refers to visible cases,if it is interpreted as such, then it is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla slus and the Syllabus of Errors. Vatican Council II (LG 16, LG 14 etc) is a rupture with Tradition.

The two popes are interpreting Vatican Council II with LG 16 etc being visible instead of invisible. This is a factual and objective mistake.
It is no suprise that Pope Francis rejects an ecunmenism of return and the need for non Christians to formally convert into the Church for salvation ( to avoid Hell).Similarly it was no surprise for me when Pope Benedict in the interview with Avvenire said extra ecclesiam nulla salus is no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries.
The discussion of the Fr. Leonard Feeney case may seem academic or a thing of the past however it has a direct relationship today, with how we interpret Vatican Council II.The SSPX's canonical status and the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate regularising their canonical status depends on this interpretation of Vatican Council II.

-Lionel Andrades
ľubica likes this.
Matthew likes this.
Humilitatis shares this.
What will he,remove next?
aderito likes this.