Torten-Angriff auf Msgr. Leonard von Brüssel
It starts with innocent pies...I hope it will never become killing bullets
Assault on Archbishop of Brussels/ Mechelen
I wanted to react to the wrong reporting of the thoughts of Mgr Leonard by Odin.
First of all, the bishop never said that it was a punishement by God...NEVER AT ALL. He declared that it is kind of an immanent justice, not a divine justice, just like getting cancer by smoking habits...that's obvious. If you have a licentious sexual behaviour it is obvious that you could get HIV/AIDS.
He never said …More
I wanted to react to the wrong reporting of the thoughts of Mgr Leonard by Odin.
First of all, the bishop never said that it was a punishement by God...NEVER AT ALL. He declared that it is kind of an immanent justice, not a divine justice, just like getting cancer by smoking habits...that's obvious. If you have a licentious sexual behaviour it is obvious that you could get HIV/AIDS.
He never said homosexuality was a disease. He did, indeed, make a comparison with anorexia, but not comparing homosexuality with anorexia, but considering the behaviour we have in both cases. Anorexia is not a normal behaviour, he said, but this doesn't make an anorexia patient abnormal in its own. The same for gays, he said, the behaviour is not the normal one, but this doesn't make them abnormal.
And finally you cheated also on his third quote. He is just wondering if, for old abusers (much more than the 60 years you propose, since the priests he's speaking about are not punishable by law anymore because they comitted these acts too long ago), it is not more usefull to organise a confrontation between the victim and the abuser.
I don't care about all this story, but I think it is important to report everything and completely...with context. When I read your comment it is obvious that you only read the newspapers whitout doing some deeper research...
BE INTELLECTUALY HONEST PLEASE
First of all, the bishop never said that it was a punishement by God...NEVER AT ALL. He declared that it is kind of an immanent justice, not a divine justice, just like getting cancer by smoking habits...that's obvious. If you have a licentious sexual behaviour it is obvious that you could get HIV/AIDS.
He never said homosexuality was a disease. He did, indeed, make a comparison with anorexia, but not comparing homosexuality with anorexia, but considering the behaviour we have in both cases. Anorexia is not a normal behaviour, he said, but this doesn't make an anorexia patient abnormal in its own. The same for gays, he said, the behaviour is not the normal one, but this doesn't make them abnormal.
And finally you cheated also on his third quote. He is just wondering if, for old abusers (much more than the 60 years you propose, since the priests he's speaking about are not punishable by law anymore because they comitted these acts too long ago), it is not more usefull to organise a confrontation between the victim and the abuser.
I don't care about all this story, but I think it is important to report everything and completely...with context. When I read your comment it is obvious that you only read the newspapers whitout doing some deeper research...
BE INTELLECTUALY HONEST PLEASE