I see the point. But I want to contribute another thought. I think that the priest was also "lying", with all due respect. Specifically, it's a form of lying called "misleading". It was done for a good purpose because any kid who had tried to find Mark 17 and did not find it would say: "I was looking for it but did not find it anywhere". And by telling the truth the kid would have purged the priest's misleading hint. I hope I made myself clear.

Response to Mr. wluckey,
Sir, you miss the point; actually, I will put it more directly - your comments (conveniently) take the statements of the bishops out of context for the purpose of making them look dumb; this article states clearly that the bishops "single out radical capitalism and maintain that the economy must be at the service of people and respect moral rules." So? The bishops do not criticize "capitalism" as such but "radical capitalism" which includes, among others, such transgressions "disrespect for moral values", for example unbridled greed and materialism, survival of the fittest (Darwinian theory of the evolution) etc. But you quoted only the word "capitalism". And also, your allegation has another manipulative aspect, namely: you suggest that the bishops just sit in their church and brood over economic issues without having any economic education or background. How unfair and simplistic of you. Why? Because, as far as I know, the bishops consult the best economists and financial "think tanks" in the country, just like any president or governor does. And such specialists work for the bishops as consultants. Don't you think so?
P.S.
Since you profess to be highly educated, I'm thinking if your omissions are a coincidence or something else? By the way, I am a lawyer with over 20 years experience and legal practice invariably forces every lawyer to face all kinds of manipulations and rhetorical machinations. So I guess I can tell one when I see one.

On page 5 of your publication dated September 2010, the top picture shown has the description: "The young Karol with his friend Hania: a quasi-engagement". !!!!!! But this is not a picture of Karol Wojtyla !!!! This picture is taken from a movie (I think entitled "Karol, the man who became the Pope") about the life of Karol Wojtyla and it shows fictional characters of the actors; specifically, the picture of the man shows an actor who did NOT even play Wojtyla but actually a student who was spying on Wojtyla for some time (obviously at the behest of the communist masonic soviet-Polish secret police); and in that movie this man actually repented and confessed his sins and became a decent catholic again.
Your publication shows detailed analysis of all aspects of the life and endeavors of Karol Wojtyla so you (I means the author(s)) profess that you know Wojtyla's life. Therefore, I makes it almost impossible for me to believe that you would not know this. Especially when the description of the picture "suggests" that Wojtyla was engaged. It seems to me that you included this to smear Wojtyla which "logically" plays into the entire theme of your publication.
I want everyone to read this because this picture is simply misleading, to put it mildly.
"Truth will make you free" says your headline; oh yes, and I will add: "And the lie will enslave you in the throngs of Evil".
I pray for you but I demand a correction from you publicly on this forum. I feel offended as a catholic, not to mention that it offends pure and simple reason and common sense.