Christmas Campaign: Financial Insights
Clicks1.8K
en.news
8

New Creed: “I Believe In Pope Francis”

St Augustine parish in San Agustín, Jalisco, Mexico, recited on Sunday, October 25, after the announcements a second creed dedicated to Francis (NovusOrdoWatch.org, video below).

Here is the text:
“I believe in Pope Francis as the legitimate Successor of the Apostle Peter.
I believe that the Holy Spirit speaks to the Church through him.
I believe that he guides the Catholic Church as a true Pastor.
I believe that he is diligently concerned with all of humanity, because we are all brothers and sons of God.
I believe in his magisterium, which is in perfect harmony with the faith and morals of the Church.
I believe that his personal opinions reflect the evangelical attitude of the believers in Christ.
I reject all offenses, aspersions, and insults towards his person.
As for those who reject his authority, I affirm that they are in ecclesiastical error as much as in error of communion."

The "creed" was proclaimed after Francis’ endorsement of homosex unions.

#newsDxkpltlahw

alfred dunn
Geez, talk about brain dead.
CatholicAmerican
As per this note below, from a recent Gloria TV article,...

1.) As of 1 November 2020, putting in doubt Francis lawful status as the Pope of the Catholic Church (“anti-pope”, “false prophet” etc.) is a bannable offence on www.gloria.tv.

... this is quite the follow up article of the
New Creed: “I Believe In Pope Francis”

I’m starting to wonder if this new creed will be required for any future …More
As per this note below, from a recent Gloria TV article,...

1.) As of 1 November 2020, putting in doubt Francis lawful status as the Pope of the Catholic Church (“anti-pope”, “false prophet” etc.) is a bannable offence on www.gloria.tv.

... this is quite the follow up article of the
New Creed: “I Believe In Pope Francis”

I’m starting to wonder if this new creed will be required for any future GloriaTV commentators or else,...dun, dun, dun, done..., they’ll be BANNED!!!

Well, I won’t give voice to the New Creed. I wont say that the emperor is wearing clothes when he is not, despite the banning threat. If the emperor is without clothes, I will tell the truth. It’s a sad day when GloriaTV wants people to cover their eyes and close their mouths and deny the truth. Well, I won’t deny the truth..., because, frankly/truthfully, there is great doubt as to the lawful status of “Pope” Francis. Catholic scholars have questioned it.
How can Bergoglio be legally considered Pope Francis when the Saint Gallen “Mafia” admitted to lobbying for him for Pope, and Pope John Paul II had already ruled that if people lobby for the Pope, it is to be considered null and void....?? Also, as far as it goes, Pope Benedict XVI never properly or fully resigned. Then, there’s the worshipping of idols which Bergoglio not only participated in, but encouraged others to do in the Vatican gardens. Bad Ol’ Pachamama... An idolator cannot be Pope. I guess Pachamama is minted on the new Vatican coin, now... Well, even if you keep your eyes closed, ears blocked, and heads in the sand, it does not change the truth.
Go ahead and ban me, because I speak the truth and you do not want to hear it! Well, no man is so blind as he who refuses to see. Don’t close your eyes to the truth.
The truth will set you free.
comfort ye
I have to answer people who have questions about the Pope and I find it helpful to read all these observations. Saints have disagreed on such matters and still they are Saints. But if Gloria TV ceases to allow disputation, well the salt has lost its savour.
Ultraviolet
@CatholicAmerican You are not required to believe in Pope Francis to post on GTV. You are, however, prohibited from from defaming the Pope -which shouldn't be too much of a surprise on a Catholic media portal. I suggest you join some of the other big Catholic forums and try hurling invectives at the Pope, disputing his legitmacy, etc... See how that works for you. ;-)

"because, frankly/…More
@CatholicAmerican You are not required to believe in Pope Francis to post on GTV. You are, however, prohibited from from defaming the Pope -which shouldn't be too much of a surprise on a Catholic media portal. I suggest you join some of the other big Catholic forums and try hurling invectives at the Pope, disputing his legitmacy, etc... See how that works for you. ;-)

"because, frankly/truthfully, there is great doubt as to the lawful status of "Pope" Francis"

Great doubt? No. The overwhelming majority of the Catholic world acknowledges Francis is the Pope.

"Catholic scholars have questioned it."

...and other Catholic scholars have refuted them.

"Pope Benedict XVI never properly or fully resigned."

Rubbish. You've just discredited yourself. Same old cannard, zero examples given. Try supporting that claim on any point and I'll make you eat it. ;-)

To save yourself a lot of time, Check my posts, notably the "refutation" types.

"Then, there’s the worshipping of idols which Bergoglio not only participated in, but encouraged others to do in the Vatican gardens. An idolator cannot be Pope."

Seems you're forgetting JP II's Quran kissing, and participation in pagan festivals and Benedict XVI's lovely prayer session to Allah at a Muslim mosque. If you're NOT forgetting those instances, you've either been a sedevacantist through the last two papacies or you're being a hypocrite during the current one.

"I guess Pachamama is minted on the new Vatican coin, now..."

She wasn't. The figure on the Vatican coin isn't Pachamama. Try supporting that claim on any point and you'll be eating it for desert after your entree of "Benedict XVI never properly or fully resigned".

"Go ahead and ban me, because I speak the truth and you do not want to hear it!"

LOL-No. You don't speak the truth.

I suggest you take my advice and try speaking your laughable notions of "the truth" on other Catholic forums, particularly large ones with far more active moderation.. If you're allowed to, then you've found a new home. Shop around, brah
Roberto 55
This guy wants to be a new el cardenale.
Child of Our Lady
I'm guessing the church would be very silent when the above lines would be read. This also violates the First Commandment.
RzaExel
Can anyone say papolatry?