Heretical doctrine and liturgy of the Neocatechumenal Way - Bishop Athanasius Schneider. Question: How Catholics, who want to honor and respect for the Lord Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament, how he should …More
Heretical doctrine and liturgy of the Neocatechumenal Way - Bishop Athanasius Schneider.
Question: How Catholics, who want to honor and respect for the Lord Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament, how he should talk to the parish priest, who has inside jewish Neocatechumenat?
Because if Neocatechumenate takes on hand, the priest will never allow Holy Communion on knees.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider:
Humanly speaking - impossible. Humanly impossible.
Because these groups have a lot of power, they have received a lot of privileges and are very strong and influential. Also in the Vatican.
It is truly surprising lobby.
They promote the liturgy completely protestanted
From the doctrinal point what they preach, it is almost heresy.
Because they preach almost heretical views. Where the key is that the breakthrough Constantine (313 BC), In which the emperor Constantine acknowledged the Christian religion, was almost the substantial break between the early Church before-constantine.
and that after this Constantine break Church has entered an era of degradation, from the spiritual liturgical and doctrinal.
... And only Vatican Council (1962-65), until he brought us the true light.
So, the Catholic Church lived for 1700 years as if in some shade a some kind of darkness.
... And they (Neocatechumenal Way) have this idea of the many vocations and that they now bring this era to the true church, so called the Church of pre-Constantinian ages.
But this way of seeing things is the purest myth!!!
Even with a historical point of view it is not true!!!
Because in this period before/after-Constantinian we not observe any split doctrinal or liturgical. The best example is the father of the Church, whom we bestow the title of the most traditional, conservative - St. Athanasius.
St. Athanasius (295-373) has been brought up as a child, as a young man at a time when the Church was still persecuted
... And when St. Athanasius was a bishop, a few years after the Constantinian revolt.
He lived almost to the end of the fourth century
he died in the year 373
so 60th years after the Constantinian Edict of Milan (313 BC)
and he emphasized in his homilies, in his speeches, in his works that communicate what was in his devotion, in her liturgy, in the way of his thinking - what He learned as a child.
Therefore St. Athanasius clearly shows that there was no break, no split between the era of before and after Constantinian.
Just say other fathers of the Church, St. Hilary (? - 468) And St. Ambrose (339-397).
These arguments, I can say clearly, they completely smash, destroy what is said about this Neocatechumenate Constantinian split.
This can let enough because at this topic we could talk for hours.
Question: How Catholics, who want to honor and respect for the Lord Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament, how he should talk to the parish priest, who has inside jewish Neocatechumenat?
Because if Neocatechumenate takes on hand, the priest will never allow Holy Communion on knees.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider:
Humanly speaking - impossible. Humanly impossible.
Because these groups have a lot of power, they have received a lot of privileges and are very strong and influential. Also in the Vatican.
It is truly surprising lobby.
They promote the liturgy completely protestanted
From the doctrinal point what they preach, it is almost heresy.
Because they preach almost heretical views. Where the key is that the breakthrough Constantine (313 BC), In which the emperor Constantine acknowledged the Christian religion, was almost the substantial break between the early Church before-constantine.
and that after this Constantine break Church has entered an era of degradation, from the spiritual liturgical and doctrinal.
... And only Vatican Council (1962-65), until he brought us the true light.
So, the Catholic Church lived for 1700 years as if in some shade a some kind of darkness.
... And they (Neocatechumenal Way) have this idea of the many vocations and that they now bring this era to the true church, so called the Church of pre-Constantinian ages.
But this way of seeing things is the purest myth!!!
Even with a historical point of view it is not true!!!
Because in this period before/after-Constantinian we not observe any split doctrinal or liturgical. The best example is the father of the Church, whom we bestow the title of the most traditional, conservative - St. Athanasius.
St. Athanasius (295-373) has been brought up as a child, as a young man at a time when the Church was still persecuted
... And when St. Athanasius was a bishop, a few years after the Constantinian revolt.
He lived almost to the end of the fourth century
he died in the year 373
so 60th years after the Constantinian Edict of Milan (313 BC)
and he emphasized in his homilies, in his speeches, in his works that communicate what was in his devotion, in her liturgy, in the way of his thinking - what He learned as a child.
Therefore St. Athanasius clearly shows that there was no break, no split between the era of before and after Constantinian.
Just say other fathers of the Church, St. Hilary (? - 468) And St. Ambrose (339-397).
These arguments, I can say clearly, they completely smash, destroy what is said about this Neocatechumenate Constantinian split.
This can let enough because at this topic we could talk for hours.