TradCatKnight Radio: "Modernist Rome "Recognizes" Neo-SSPX in Argentina" TradCatKnight Radio: "Modernist Rome "Recognizes" Neo-SSPX in Argentina" Talk given 4/13/2015, The Resistance Thank you to the …More
TradCatKnight Radio: "Modernist Rome "Recognizes" Neo-SSPX in Argentina"
TradCatKnight Radio: "Modernist Rome "Recognizes" Neo-SSPX in Argentina"
Talk given 4/13/2015, The Resistance
Thank you to the Coon Family and Carole Quines for your recent donations!
Your special intentions are mine...
In this talk I cover how it is "not a good thing" to be called
"catholic" from modernist Rome who does not even have
the proper understanding of what it is to be a real catholic.
You are seeing the pseudo-traditionalist propaganda building
up all over the Internet (Rorate, Remnant, DICI, etc) as if this
were actually a good thing!
The NEW position change of the Neo-SSPX has watered down
"heresy" into mere "mistakes & errors" which now gives them an opportunity
to try and climb back over the fence into ConciliarVille and try and "appear"
"catholic".
In short, the Conciliar definition of "Catholic" is not Catholic and yet they say the Neo-SSPX are "Catholic? What does that say about the Neo-SSPX?
Fr. Paul Kramer (Response to this breaking news):
There is nothing "normal" about coming into communion with, and under obedience to Bergoglio's Newchurch. Bergoglio is the spearhead of the apostasy. By aligning itself with heretical Conciliar Rome, the SSPX will not be"integrated fully into the Church", but will be going out of communion with the Catholic Church and into communion with Newchurch. The bonds of communion are 1) faith, 2) worship, and 3) ecclesiastical governance. The Conciliar Church breaks the first by teaching heresy; the second by replacing the "rite handed down" (Council of Constance Sess.39) with a new rite, and the third by enforcing its schismatic rites and false doctrines. It is not those who remain in communion with Catholicism by adhering to Tradition who "stay outside the Church thinking they have created something better"; it is Conciliar Rome that created the innovations in doctrine and liturgy, thereby breaking communion with Catholicism and creating a new religion. The SSPX does not need to seek to become "integrated fully into the Church" -- under Archbishop Lefebvre it remained fully integrated in the Church. It is Bergoglio Newchurch that needs to be brought back into communion with Catholicism, and thus become integrated fully into the Church.
Further points made by Fr. Kramer:
In order to gain state recognition, they had to officially place themselves into full obedience and communion with the conciliar church.
They had to become an ASSOCIATION OF DIOCESAN RIGHT in order to gain state recognition. That means they had to first apply to the conciliar hierarchy and be accepted into communion and obedience with the Conciliar Church in order to gain the juridical status of Associstion of Diocesan Right.
The fact remains, the Archbishop had to disobey, and get "suspended" and "excommunicated" after becoming an institute of diocesan right. Now, Fellay's crew in Argentina must obey or get "suspended" or "excommunicated".
The SSPX in Argentina is now beholden to the heretics, and at the mercy of the heretics, and juridically in obedience to the heretics.
Obedience to heretical and schismatic Conciliar Rome is not in the bylaws of any Catholic religious order.
Archbishop Lefrbvre had the reasonable expectation in 1971 that the bishops under whose authority the SSPX would be erected, would allow them to function as a fully Catholic and traditional organization. Rome applied the pressure and Mgr. Lefebvre disobeyed. That same reasonable expectation of 1971 simply does not exist today in 2015. To say that the situation today is the same is sheer lunacy.
The Neo-SSPX no longer preaches the hard line of Tradition of Mgr. Lefebvre, but the line of lesst resistance of Maximillian Krah. If they revert to the Lefebvre line, they will be deprived of their status as an association of diocesan right, and lose their newly gained conciliar respectability.
You are not Catholics any longer when you place yourselves in obedience and full communion with an apostate entity like Bergoglio's Rome.
Q. Why do you bow down before the image of the beast?
A. Oh, I don't really worship him -- I just did it so I could get a visa.
Let's become Protestants so we can convert the Protties to Catholicism !!
They had to become an Association of Diocesan Right in order to gain the legal status they acquired; just like Catholics in China must affiliate with the Patriotic Association to gain legal recognition. Their MOTIVE may be to get visas, but what good is it to get visas if they must sell their souls to get them?
Latest Neo-SSPX News:
SSPX Partnering With Company Aligned with Planned Parenthood
abplefebvreforums.proboards.com/…/partnering-comp…
TradCatKnight Radio: "Modernist Rome "Recognizes" Neo-SSPX in Argentina"
Talk given 4/13/2015, The Resistance
Thank you to the Coon Family and Carole Quines for your recent donations!
Your special intentions are mine...
In this talk I cover how it is "not a good thing" to be called
"catholic" from modernist Rome who does not even have
the proper understanding of what it is to be a real catholic.
You are seeing the pseudo-traditionalist propaganda building
up all over the Internet (Rorate, Remnant, DICI, etc) as if this
were actually a good thing!
The NEW position change of the Neo-SSPX has watered down
"heresy" into mere "mistakes & errors" which now gives them an opportunity
to try and climb back over the fence into ConciliarVille and try and "appear"
"catholic".
In short, the Conciliar definition of "Catholic" is not Catholic and yet they say the Neo-SSPX are "Catholic? What does that say about the Neo-SSPX?
Fr. Paul Kramer (Response to this breaking news):
There is nothing "normal" about coming into communion with, and under obedience to Bergoglio's Newchurch. Bergoglio is the spearhead of the apostasy. By aligning itself with heretical Conciliar Rome, the SSPX will not be"integrated fully into the Church", but will be going out of communion with the Catholic Church and into communion with Newchurch. The bonds of communion are 1) faith, 2) worship, and 3) ecclesiastical governance. The Conciliar Church breaks the first by teaching heresy; the second by replacing the "rite handed down" (Council of Constance Sess.39) with a new rite, and the third by enforcing its schismatic rites and false doctrines. It is not those who remain in communion with Catholicism by adhering to Tradition who "stay outside the Church thinking they have created something better"; it is Conciliar Rome that created the innovations in doctrine and liturgy, thereby breaking communion with Catholicism and creating a new religion. The SSPX does not need to seek to become "integrated fully into the Church" -- under Archbishop Lefebvre it remained fully integrated in the Church. It is Bergoglio Newchurch that needs to be brought back into communion with Catholicism, and thus become integrated fully into the Church.
Further points made by Fr. Kramer:
In order to gain state recognition, they had to officially place themselves into full obedience and communion with the conciliar church.
They had to become an ASSOCIATION OF DIOCESAN RIGHT in order to gain state recognition. That means they had to first apply to the conciliar hierarchy and be accepted into communion and obedience with the Conciliar Church in order to gain the juridical status of Associstion of Diocesan Right.
The fact remains, the Archbishop had to disobey, and get "suspended" and "excommunicated" after becoming an institute of diocesan right. Now, Fellay's crew in Argentina must obey or get "suspended" or "excommunicated".
The SSPX in Argentina is now beholden to the heretics, and at the mercy of the heretics, and juridically in obedience to the heretics.
Obedience to heretical and schismatic Conciliar Rome is not in the bylaws of any Catholic religious order.
Archbishop Lefrbvre had the reasonable expectation in 1971 that the bishops under whose authority the SSPX would be erected, would allow them to function as a fully Catholic and traditional organization. Rome applied the pressure and Mgr. Lefebvre disobeyed. That same reasonable expectation of 1971 simply does not exist today in 2015. To say that the situation today is the same is sheer lunacy.
The Neo-SSPX no longer preaches the hard line of Tradition of Mgr. Lefebvre, but the line of lesst resistance of Maximillian Krah. If they revert to the Lefebvre line, they will be deprived of their status as an association of diocesan right, and lose their newly gained conciliar respectability.
You are not Catholics any longer when you place yourselves in obedience and full communion with an apostate entity like Bergoglio's Rome.
Q. Why do you bow down before the image of the beast?
A. Oh, I don't really worship him -- I just did it so I could get a visa.
Let's become Protestants so we can convert the Protties to Catholicism !!
They had to become an Association of Diocesan Right in order to gain the legal status they acquired; just like Catholics in China must affiliate with the Patriotic Association to gain legal recognition. Their MOTIVE may be to get visas, but what good is it to get visas if they must sell their souls to get them?
Latest Neo-SSPX News:
SSPX Partnering With Company Aligned with Planned Parenthood
abplefebvreforums.proboards.com/…/partnering-comp…