”God is the One who contaminates himself with our human woundedness, and he is not afraid to come into contact with our wounds," Francis said during his February 14 Angelus.
He then made an objection, "But, Father, what are you saying? What God contaminates himself?" - but only in order to smash it, "I am not saying this, St Paul said it: he made himself to be sin. He who was not a sinner, who could not sin, made himself to be sin [2 Cor 5,21]."
Getting all excited about contamination, Francis continued covering his theological confusion with emotional claptrap, "Look at how God contaminated himself to draw near to us, to have compassion and to make us understand his tenderness. Closeness, compassion, and tenderness.“
In truth, Christ assumed the human nature and the human condition, except sin and contamination. Accordingly, Saint Paul never says that Christ "contaminated" himself. During his passion, Christ took upon himself the punishment on behalf of the sinners. Redemption is about guilt and satisfaction, not about emotions, "tenderness," "compassion," or "closeness."
Bergoglio maliciously twists the passage from St. Paul to utter blasphemy. Bergoglio acts maliciously since he has repeated this same blasphemy several times. 2 Corinthians 5:21 Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition For our sake he made him to be sin[a] who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God Footnotes 5.21made him to be sin: i.e., “sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, he condemned sin in the flesh” (Rom 8.3).
This is no shock.... no surprise ....coming from Bergoglio. He now has a history of blasphemy, heresy, idol worshipping (Pachamama event at Vatican), heretical sanctioning of sacrilegious Communion (Amoris Laetitia). It would be a shock to hear that any of the Popes of history had blasphemed in this way, but not Bergoglio, the one who was part of the St Gallen Mafia group that pressured Pope Benedict to resign and then illegally canvassed for votes at the conclave that followed. Please remember that this man is the one that was to come after an event that is very, very rare in the history of the Church ..............A PAPAL RESIGNATION!!! Does anyone remember feeling REALLY shocked after Benedict's resignation announcement on Feb 11, 2013 and wondering what ever would follow this unsettlingly rare event. Well now you know.......IT IS JORGE MARIO BERGOGLIO WITH ALL OF HIS APPALLING WORDS AND ACTIONS SINCE HE PRESUMED THE CHAIR OF PETER!!!!!!!!! And for all those who think a Pope can be a heretic....... talk to St Robert Bellarmine and St Francis de Sales about that one. One plus one does not equal three. And if you do think so .....when did you begin to believe it possible....pre or post Bergoglio taking the Chair on Mar 13, 2013. If it is post ......you have been liberalised, hereticised, modernistised by JM Bergoglio and you didn't even notice!!!
There's no evidence Benedict was pressured and Benedict himself has repeatedly contradicted such a claim. You could buy a decent lunch if you had a dollar for every time Benedict mentioned he resigned of his own free will.
Commenting on the former requirement set forth in Canon 332 §2 (that the resignation be “made freely”), Cardinal Walter Brandmüller recently said: The simple declaration of free resignation on the part of the person in question [the pope] is not enough, because depending on the circumstances that statement could easily be forced, and the resignation therefore invalid. This, my friends, is really just common sense. Think about it: If you answered your telephone while a burglar was holding a gun to your head, you may very well insist to the caller that all is well. The caller in his turn would then go about believing and behaving as if all truly is well, and no one may be the wiser. (see akacatholic.com/…bshell-goes-all-but-unnoticed/)