la verdad prevalece

The entirety of the pro-homosexual pamphlet *Fiducia Supplicans*—which permits sacrilegious blessings of unrepentant homosexual concubines—is heretical, sacrilegious, and diabolical, just as Cardinal Müller warned.

Pope Leo XIV affirms informal blessing for homosexual couples and downplays sexual sin

Prevost’s Evasive Response to the Apostate Marx’s Homosexual Pseudo-Blessings: No Sanctions.


Malachi 2:2 I will send a curse on you, and I will turn your blessings into a curse. se.


Prevost has not repudiated "the entirety" of the apostate and heretical pamphlets *Amoris Laetitia* and *Fiducia Supplicans*.

Rather, Tucho and Prevost seek to legitimize this by invoking an alleged transgression of the boundaries that the homosexual Tucho—acting in complicity with Bergoglio—had established; this maneuver, in its diabolical cunning, was skillfully contrived to soften the impact of the apostasy.

But homosexual activists—beginning with Tucho, Bergoglio, Prevost, James Martin and the sacrilegious German apostates—have, in fact, given themselves permission to transgress biblical boundaries and Catholic moral doctrine.

Consequently, the pamphlets *Amoris Laetitia* and *Fiducia Supplicans* consummate a triple sacrilege: on the part of the unrepentant sinners who engage in the vice of sodomy or in any form of fornication and adultery, as well as on the part of the priest who imparts the sacrilegious blessing.

Cardinal Müller addressed Bergoglio: Blessing same-sex couples is "impossible" and a "blasphemy."


Let us recall that Prevost had already employed this same diabolical tactic to legitimize the pamphlet—creating the impression that he was defending the boundaries established by Tucho and Bergoglio regarding an alleged abuse of the pro-homosexual pamphlet *Fiducia Supplicans*—a tactic in which he publicly cast doubt upon Catholic teaching concerning sexual morality and the immutability of dogma.
Archbishop Viganò: Fr. Fernández’s Defense of *Fiducia Supplicans* Demonstrates His ‘Manifest Heresy’


By whom are they blessed, if God does not bless sin?
Saint Paul warns us not to be deceived, for those who obstinately practice the vice of sodomy, commit adultery, or are idolaters—worshiping Pachamama, the false god Allah, and other idols and false gods—will go to the eternal fire.

The laying on of hands in the Bible is used for various purposes: to bless, to heal, or to delegate authority (Mark 16:18; Genesis 48:14-15; Numbers 27:18-20).

1 Timothy 5:22: Do not lay hands on anyone hastily, thereby sharing responsibility for the sins of others; keep yourself free from sin.

1 Thessalonians 4:3 It is the WILL of God that you should lead a life of sanctity. You must refrain from sexual immorality.



Prevost adds religious liberty to his heretical definition of "morality," which means that Prevost's morality stands opposed to the Supremacy of Christ in society. He opposes the Reign of Christ; that is why we see this apostate fawning over idolatrous Muslims who worship the false god Allah. Nor does he have any problem worshipping Pachamama and supporting indigenous paganism.
8635
la verdad prevalece shares this

Prevost attempts to normalize Bergoglio's *Fiducia Supplicans*, which promotes the sacrilegious blessing of the sin of sodomy.

5322
la verdad prevalece

Let us also recall that Bergoglio, in defending the sacrilegious blessing of homosexual concubines, stated that "they loved one another". This is not—as Prevost attempts to make us believe—merely a blessing of individuals (who, in fact, do not present themselves individually, but rather as homosexual couples); rather, it is a malicious act that confirms these concubines in their sinful homosexual relationship.
Cardinal Müller calls Pope Francis’ homosexual ‘blessings’ an attack on marriage
Cardinal Sarah: Divine judgment will fall on priests who do not oppose abortion, homosexuality
Abortion, homosexuality show ‘final battle’ between God and Satan has come: Cardinal Carlo Caffarra

  • Report
la verdad prevalece

Homosexual concubines participate in a shared and eternal spiritual suicide. They are active participants in their mutual condemnation.
Jude 7:
'Likewise, Sodom, Gomorrah and the surrounding towns, indulged in fornication and practiced unnatural vice, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.'
St. Thomas Aquinas: 'There, the associates of his wretchedness, far from alleviating the lot of the damned soul, will make it more intolerable for him.'
Hebrews 13:4
Let marriage be held in honor by all, and the marriage bed kept undefiled, for those who are immoral and adulterers will have to face God's judgment.
The primary objective of the Sacrament of Matrimony is to help one another attain Heaven—mutual salvation.
'The road to hell is open for the wicked. Once they enter into it, they will never come up again. They will be without glory or bliss and will be filled with misery and everlasting reproach.'
Christ, to St. Bridget of Sweden, 'The Revelations'
Scivias by Saint Hildegard von Bingen: 78. God will judge all perpetrators of fornication, sodomy and bestiality
“Someone who lived practicing the vice of sodomy will suffer more pains in Hell than any one else, because this is the worst sin that there is.” St. Bernardine of Siena

  • Report
2 more comments from la verdad prevalece
la verdad prevalece

Hebrews 10:26
New Catholic Bible
26 Apostasy Remains Unforgiven.[a] If we deliberately persist in sin after having received the knowledge of the truth, then there no longer remains any sacrifice for sins.

  • Report
la verdad prevalece

Footnotes
Hebrews 10:26 Once again the author repeats this somber warning (see Heb 6:1-8; Mt 12:31). Those who rebel against Christ exclude themselves from Christ’s forgiveness, from his life, and from his grace. Let them, therefore, meditate on the threats of God’s vengeance about which the Bible speaks, and especially the texts cited here (see Ex 24:8; Deut 17:6; 32:35f; Isa 26:11).

  • Report
myunkie

It is simple math:
"Tutu, tuti, tuti" + "We can hope Hell is empty" = Christ was only kidding. (What a scamp.) This club has fallen below protestant standards and is not even a shadow of the church founded by the Apostles.

  • Report
la verdad prevalece

"Do you renounce Satan? And all his works? And all his pomps?" R: "I do."
When we, as Catholics, renew our baptismal promises or vows, we swear before God and renounce all attachment to sin—all the works of Satan and his seductions; that is to say, we renounce living deliberately in sin. Therefore, it is impossible to receive a blessing when we deliberately defy God and, sinning out of presumption, expect Him to grant us impunity to continue sinning.
Hebrews 10:26
For if we go on sinning willfully after having come to the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins.
Jesus warned that we must not cast our pearls before swine, lest they trample them underfoot—a reference to the Sacraments—for these are not the private property of priests. The Church has declared that in the proper use of a sacramental—for example, the wearing of a scapular—one commits oneself to wearing it with dignity; that is, to not continue sinning, for such items are abused when one obstinately persists in sin, as they are not amulets. No one would don the military uniform of a nation only to betray it and fight from within on behalf of the enemy side. If, on the social plane, this is called treason, it is no less so on the spiritual plane. Scripture clearly teaches us that anyone who continues to sin deliberately after baptism tramples upon the Blood of Christ. The person who deliberately commits sacrilege is renouncing the faith—is apostatizing from the faith; consequently, only eternal punishment awaits him, for—having spurned the Sacrifice of Christ by becoming a member of the enemy camp (thereby becoming a member of the body of the Antichrist)—he has committed a sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit and has rejected his own redemption. Likewise, no priest possesses a power superior to that of God that would allow him to "bless" a person who openly defies God, challenges Catholic moral doctrine, and lives deliberately in contradiction with the moral teachings of the Church. Such a priest thus becomes an ACCOMPLICE in sin and with sinners. He commits sacrilege.
Canon 188§4 states: "All offices become vacant *ipso facto* by tacit resignation in the following cases... (4) If a cleric has publicly abandoned the Catholic faith."
Consequently, the priest becomes an apostate; together with the impenitent sinner, he commits the sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. For if Scripture merely prohibits the laying on of hands upon impenitent sinners—because whoever does so participates in the sin—it follows that, by acting as an accomplice, one renders oneself deserving of exactly the same punishment as the one who commits the sin.
Prevost also maliciously added religious liberty to his heretical definition of "morality," which means that Prevost's morality stands in opposition to the Supremacy of Christ in society. He opposes the Reign of Christ; that is why we see this apostate fawning over idolatrous Muslims who worship the false god Allah. Nor does he have any qualms about worshipping Pachamama and supporting indigenous paganism.

  • Report
One more comment from la verdad prevalece
la verdad prevalece

Cardinals Burke, Müller condemn Pope Francis' …

  • Report
la verdad prevalece

The 'Synodal Way' wants to reverse Catholic …

  • Report
Login
Create accountForgot password?